<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Update on the Gold Policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/28/update-on-the-gold-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/28/update-on-the-gold-policy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenji</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/28/update-on-the-gold-policy/#comment-229217</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kenji]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2014 08:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=19718#comment-229217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gold-to-credit is the worst thing to do.
Better buy a premium T8 and farm credit with it]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gold-to-credit is the worst thing to do.<br />
Better buy a premium T8 and farm credit with it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zeroyuki9221</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/28/update-on-the-gold-policy/#comment-228766</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zeroyuki9221]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2014 16:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=19718#comment-228766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I don&#039;t have any serious complain about the site itself, I gotta agree that the comment section is becoming more toxic lately. Raging to obvious placeholder stats, raging to experimental extreme stats in supertest, raging to &quot;nerf&quot; of unpublished- supposed to be internal info only mission in supertest? Raging at usual SerB reaction to stupid questions?
I just hope AW come out already so WG could have more rivals (always a good thing) and those guys quickly move their ass to AW just like what they boast everyday. Less toxic is good.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I don&#8217;t have any serious complain about the site itself, I gotta agree that the comment section is becoming more toxic lately. Raging to obvious placeholder stats, raging to experimental extreme stats in supertest, raging to &#8220;nerf&#8221; of unpublished- supposed to be internal info only mission in supertest? Raging at usual SerB reaction to stupid questions?<br />
I just hope AW come out already so WG could have more rivals (always a good thing) and those guys quickly move their ass to AW just like what they boast everyday. Less toxic is good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daemonik</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/28/update-on-the-gold-policy/#comment-228755</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daemonik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2014 15:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=19718#comment-228755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, that&#039;s the irony in your reply SS. Don&#039;t like WG? Don&#039;t play the game.

90% of your readers based on comments, including you, do nothing but bash WG for the game that MILLIONS love including me. 

You are clearly running this blog to bring more information about the game to people who care, but what the hell with all the hate? I can literally pull up 10 examples of posts from a last week where the message was &quot;Ahaha, see how WG screwed up again&quot;. Why? To convince people that WoT is shit game and they shouldn&#039;t play it? Odd thing on a blog like this.

And that&#039;s what I oppose to: Not the fact that screw ups are shown, not even when some piece of information is leaked and despite being clearly not final, riles up people to be angry about it (look at supertest leak of mission requirements, I think some people literally shat a brick over it) but I oppose you deliberately coloring the information of the post with your agenda which is &quot;Fuck WG&quot;. I&#039;ve personally met a lot of people from WG and a) They are all nice people and b) they are literally just like us, normal people doing normal job to the best of their ability. 

Show me a single person who didn&#039;t fuck up at work and then show me where a group of people follow everyone else around and tells them what a pieces of shit they are for not being perfect at what they do. That kind of arrogance and internet douchiness is what happening here.

If you want to do a good job, provide the information but leave the charged commentary behind.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that&#8217;s the irony in your reply SS. Don&#8217;t like WG? Don&#8217;t play the game.</p>
<p>90% of your readers based on comments, including you, do nothing but bash WG for the game that MILLIONS love including me. </p>
<p>You are clearly running this blog to bring more information about the game to people who care, but what the hell with all the hate? I can literally pull up 10 examples of posts from a last week where the message was &#8220;Ahaha, see how WG screwed up again&#8221;. Why? To convince people that WoT is shit game and they shouldn&#8217;t play it? Odd thing on a blog like this.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s what I oppose to: Not the fact that screw ups are shown, not even when some piece of information is leaked and despite being clearly not final, riles up people to be angry about it (look at supertest leak of mission requirements, I think some people literally shat a brick over it) but I oppose you deliberately coloring the information of the post with your agenda which is &#8220;Fuck WG&#8221;. I&#8217;ve personally met a lot of people from WG and a) They are all nice people and b) they are literally just like us, normal people doing normal job to the best of their ability. </p>
<p>Show me a single person who didn&#8217;t fuck up at work and then show me where a group of people follow everyone else around and tells them what a pieces of shit they are for not being perfect at what they do. That kind of arrogance and internet douchiness is what happening here.</p>
<p>If you want to do a good job, provide the information but leave the charged commentary behind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MickerExtreme</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/28/update-on-the-gold-policy/#comment-228721</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MickerExtreme]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2014 14:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=19718#comment-228721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem is not with the blog itself, but rather in the blog&#039;s readers. It seems that the average IQ of a reader is decreasing. Lets take the december missions for example. They were an unconfirmed(if I&#039;m wrong, sorry) leak which looked like a great thing so everyone took it as confirmed info. So when the missions were &quot;nerfed&quot;(they were not in the game so I dont see how they can be nerfed) every a*shole on this blog started raging in the comments. Same thing with IMs, view range nerf etc. I mean how can someone say that the bugs in 9.4 were implemented so that 9.5 has something to write in the patchnotes, and that 9.5 is a contentless patch. Because apparently 11 new regular tanks, 4 mission reward tanks, at least one premium tank,2 new maps, and induvidual missions are not content. People used to be banned for less on this blog, now the idiots run amok. Dont get me wrong SS, I love your content(and content from the other authors), and I believe Daemonik does aswell, but the thing is the comment section became toxic because of idiots who dont know the meaning of supertest.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is not with the blog itself, but rather in the blog&#8217;s readers. It seems that the average IQ of a reader is decreasing. Lets take the december missions for example. They were an unconfirmed(if I&#8217;m wrong, sorry) leak which looked like a great thing so everyone took it as confirmed info. So when the missions were &#8220;nerfed&#8221;(they were not in the game so I dont see how they can be nerfed) every a*shole on this blog started raging in the comments. Same thing with IMs, view range nerf etc. I mean how can someone say that the bugs in 9.4 were implemented so that 9.5 has something to write in the patchnotes, and that 9.5 is a contentless patch. Because apparently 11 new regular tanks, 4 mission reward tanks, at least one premium tank,2 new maps, and induvidual missions are not content. People used to be banned for less on this blog, now the idiots run amok. Dont get me wrong SS, I love your content(and content from the other authors), and I believe Daemonik does aswell, but the thing is the comment section became toxic because of idiots who dont know the meaning of supertest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sir_Arthur McGuinness</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/28/update-on-the-gold-policy/#comment-228688</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sir_Arthur McGuinness]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2014 12:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=19718#comment-228688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Irony is your excuse? Really. You have to be better than that. Look at your comment and show me the irony. Lmao]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Irony is your excuse? Really. You have to be better than that. Look at your comment and show me the irony. Lmao</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sergayisgayhowterriblegay</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/28/update-on-the-gold-policy/#comment-228671</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sergayisgayhowterriblegay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2014 12:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=19718#comment-228671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like your school system has failed to teach you irony. Calling me a low life for insulting other people... I mean, you gotta see the sarcasm in that, unless you have some kind of brain damage.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like your school system has failed to teach you irony. Calling me a low life for insulting other people&#8230; I mean, you gotta see the sarcasm in that, unless you have some kind of brain damage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MindChanger</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/28/update-on-the-gold-policy/#comment-228636</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MindChanger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2014 10:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=19718#comment-228636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[from what I have heard new rules will be introduced to codes generated after 5. november, but I am not sure if it is true]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from what I have heard new rules will be introduced to codes generated after 5. november, but I am not sure if it is true</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Lova Lova</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/28/update-on-the-gold-policy/#comment-228610</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr Lova Lova]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2014 10:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=19718#comment-228610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good news then. Premium tank missions will still be worth doing for the gold (if you have the tank).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news then. Premium tank missions will still be worth doing for the gold (if you have the tank).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: poka_EU</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/28/update-on-the-gold-policy/#comment-228600</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[poka_EU]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2014 10:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=19718#comment-228600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They won&#039;t. Just like suddenly they changed premium tank restoration policy. They didn&#039;t even put news on portal, just quick post from Ectar on forums. I bet all-in they will do the same with this issue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They won&#8217;t. Just like suddenly they changed premium tank restoration policy. They didn&#8217;t even put news on portal, just quick post from Ectar on forums. I bet all-in they will do the same with this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sir_Arthur McGuinness</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/28/update-on-the-gold-policy/#comment-228576</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sir_Arthur McGuinness]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2014 09:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=19718#comment-228576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amazing. You have learned a lot in school. A frustrated little low life with the ambition to insult other people. Good luck.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing. You have learned a lot in school. A frustrated little low life with the ambition to insult other people. Good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
