Comments on: 2.12.2014

By: DemolitionDmitrij

DemolitionDmitrij — Wed, 03 Dec 2014 09:52:09 +0000

DSR “new technology” lol

I use downsampling (=DSR) since years! Only thing that is new, is that NV finally implements it in the driver itself. But custom downsampling is still superior (flexible resolutions, no matter 16:9, 16:10, 4:3 or 21:9 format).

To bad that WoT scales so shitty, 5k runs with like 30 fps and drops below that even on a heavenly overclocked GTX TITAN.

By: evi7stylez .

evi7stylez . — Wed, 03 Dec 2014 08:05:46 +0000

You guys are stupid or just pretending to be?
T-44 and T-34-2 has 800mm armor compared to STA absolute paper values AND the same or better mobility.
There’s no way STA-2 should get a full MM, because all of the characteristics of that tank are mediocore – it can’t fly through the battlefield, it can’t bounce shit and it can’t pen shit. So, who in its right mind would buy such a tank, if you have better options with limited MM available?

By: Takeda

Takeda — Wed, 03 Dec 2014 04:16:20 +0000

premiums are supposed to be worse than regulars. and if you can make 175 pen work, you can do it with 185.

By: ewanc9

ewanc9 — Wed, 03 Dec 2014 02:04:56 +0000

well they could give you the option of the game(s) you would have on the client.

By: ewanc9

ewanc9 — Wed, 03 Dec 2014 02:03:31 +0000

the t-44 gets 175 pen , the t-34-2 180 and the sta-2 is a premium which are meant to be worse than regular tanks of that tier.

By: FastestClassic

FastestClassic — Tue, 02 Dec 2014 23:08:01 +0000

The FCM 50t (basically a medium tank sold as a heavy trainer) has 212 penetration and it has premium matchmaking (and is faster, and has more armor… the list goes on), while this thing is slower than the FCM and has less base penetration and it does not get premium matchmaking. Seems a bit odd.

By: Argysh

Argysh — Tue, 02 Dec 2014 21:49:20 +0000

I seem to have confused some numbers. considering that sta-1 has the same pen its fine. and it’s certainly not a bad tank.

By: Mistor Tank

Mistor Tank — Tue, 02 Dec 2014 21:23:51 +0000

Yep, I actually get higher fps on WoT than WT with the same settings haha

By: manus36

manus36 — Tue, 02 Dec 2014 19:58:18 +0000

WG Does optimize the game pretty well.. at least for the low end computers.. for the high end ones.. well.. at least it’s not bugging out like War Thunder..

By: Baldrickk

Baldrickk — Tue, 02 Dec 2014 19:56:06 +0000

Do you cache WOT in a ram-disk? because otherwise you shouldn’t be seeing such an increase.

WOT hasn’t hit the 64bit era yet and is limited to 1GB RAM still – anything else goes in swap