<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 4.12.2014</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/04/4-12-2014/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/04/4-12-2014/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: exocet6951</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/04/4-12-2014/#comment-231603</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[exocet6951]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2014 07:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=20045#comment-231603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would love to see you try to detrack a tierX heavy with a 75mm L48.
You would spend more time pew pew&#039;ing pointlessly, and less time angling your turret properly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to see you try to detrack a tierX heavy with a 75mm L48.<br />
You would spend more time pew pew&#8217;ing pointlessly, and less time angling your turret properly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: exocet6951</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/04/4-12-2014/#comment-231602</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[exocet6951]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2014 07:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=20045#comment-231602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pray tell how exactly would that be a leap of gameplay logic from LTs not losing camo on the move?
Or before TDs losing less camo while firing than other tanks?

With that in mind, do tell just HOW you think that idea was bad, and how much of an arrogant dick you sound like right now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pray tell how exactly would that be a leap of gameplay logic from LTs not losing camo on the move?<br />
Or before TDs losing less camo while firing than other tanks?</p>
<p>With that in mind, do tell just HOW you think that idea was bad, and how much of an arrogant dick you sound like right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leedar</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/04/4-12-2014/#comment-231582</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leedar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2014 03:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=20045#comment-231582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The relatively fast firing 75 mm is good for tracking enemies as well. Stop the enemy from moving so you have a chance of hitting weak points with your derpy main gun.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The relatively fast firing 75 mm is good for tracking enemies as well. Stop the enemy from moving so you have a chance of hitting weak points with your derpy main gun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leedar</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/04/4-12-2014/#comment-231581</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leedar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2014 03:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=20045#comment-231581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder what the reputation of Red Alert is in the former USSR. To an extent it is pro-Western propaganda, but the Soviets are also portrayed with &#039;badass&#039; weaponry; the Allies have modest light and medium tanks but the Soviets have heavy and super-heavy tanks, both double-barrelled. What a dilemma.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what the reputation of Red Alert is in the former USSR. To an extent it is pro-Western propaganda, but the Soviets are also portrayed with &#8216;badass&#8217; weaponry; the Allies have modest light and medium tanks but the Soviets have heavy and super-heavy tanks, both double-barrelled. What a dilemma.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Infernal969</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/04/4-12-2014/#comment-231479</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Infernal969]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 21:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=20045#comment-231479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Light tanks get nerfed too much by bushes being destroyed? Boom, LTs can now nide behind broken bushes.&quot;
Did a link to the FTR get sent to some &quot;Your Daily Tomato&quot; forum?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Light tanks get nerfed too much by bushes being destroyed? Boom, LTs can now nide behind broken bushes.&#8221;<br />
Did a link to the FTR get sent to some &#8220;Your Daily Tomato&#8221; forum?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snakedoc9372</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/04/4-12-2014/#comment-231459</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[snakedoc9372]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 21:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=20045#comment-231459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pretty sure its not]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty sure its not</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lemmingtrain</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/04/4-12-2014/#comment-231451</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lemmingtrain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 20:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=20045#comment-231451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Test server is now up :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Test server is now up :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tupinambis</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/04/4-12-2014/#comment-231450</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tupinambis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 20:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=20045#comment-231450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is a terribly arrogant answer, BUT he also did just answer that same exact question just yesterday or the day before]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a terribly arrogant answer, BUT he also did just answer that same exact question just yesterday or the day before</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baldrickk</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/04/4-12-2014/#comment-231449</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baldrickk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 20:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=20045#comment-231449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m thinking of the Overlord tank from Generals (Chinese not Russian):
http://www.cnclabs.com/generals/factions/china/units.aspx
Giant Tank. And you can mount Gattling gun, fortified bunker or propoganda tower (for AOE friendly tank buffs)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m thinking of the Overlord tank from Generals (Chinese not Russian):<br />
<a href="http://www.cnclabs.com/generals/factions/china/units.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnclabs.com/generals/factions/china/units.aspx</a><br />
Giant Tank. And you can mount Gattling gun, fortified bunker or propoganda tower (for AOE friendly tank buffs)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lemmingtrain</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/04/4-12-2014/#comment-231448</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lemmingtrain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 20:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=20045#comment-231448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Test server is up :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Test server is up :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
