The Iowa class was obviously superior to anything Britain fielded in the war being both built with modern tech in mind and being bigger, but tech wise how were they any more advanced than the late KGV like Anson?

A real question surrounds how the updating of ships will be handled, I mean looking at just the Anson she had 5 radar replacements,a complete fire control replacement, her seaplanes were removed and she had 3 different up armaments adding a total of 49 AA guns (87 barrels) all in 3 years of operation. She already had more advanced fire control and radar than the earlier KGVs so the difference across the class form 1939 to 1945 must have been massive. Will that be represented by grinding modules etc like wot?

Maneuverable battleships and carriers were listed at around 800m when traveling at around 30 knots.
Which is over a minute’s worth of turning just for a 180 degree turn.

Westminister: FantABulous idea old chap!
Of course, we need to make benefits payments– and travel expenses for the dastardly lords and peers that clock in to work but don’t actually arrive too, so… Sell the planes too. I’m quite sure we can project the awesome naval power of our brand-spanking new carriers without them.
Also we’re cutting the budget for your manpower too, so fire thirty or forty thousand people would you? There’s a good chap. Anyway, I’m off to my villa *cough* Tax haven in the seycheles.

MoD: $#!7.
Admiral of the Fleet: Ramming SP-HEEED.

Much of the main gun combat in naval battles of the period was in the hope of slowing the enemy down enough that a torpedo run could kill them.

Wtf use would a sub be in a 15 vs 15 brawl anyway? Subs were about surprise attacks, no sub commander would go anywhere near a warship fleet at action stations, it would be suicide.