Comments on: 11.12.2014

By: Alexander Yordanov

Alexander Yordanov — Sat, 13 Dec 2014 10:01:18 +0000

The 260 begs to differe.

By: Doddy

Doddy — Fri, 12 Dec 2014 17:10:55 +0000

Why wouldn’t people play them, easy way to get a couple of new tanks plus extra bonus credits/consumables/premium days/pre skilled crew/barrack slots.

You wont even need to do anything different from your normal play.

Sure people who try to get the tier 10 in the first month or whatever need to look at themselves, but for most people these will be long term things providing many small rewards over time for doing little more than normal play.

By: Oberonium

Oberonium — Fri, 12 Dec 2014 08:47:56 +0000

-> well Mause have a lot of room in turret, but ROF is bad, look on WZ, have 130 mm gun in game and still better ROF.

And this is wrong, like Jagdpanther II has more RoF than Ferdinand in much bigger fighting compartment with two loaders. All because of balance, not history.

-> or soviet all their tanks was best, but there is book about first T34 and its is worse tank than PZIII, russian soldier wrote it.
There are no such thing as better or worse. Vehicle may have advantage in one side and more disadvantages at others. PzIII was more technically advanced (which is not advantage in this case, btw) than T-34 from side of industry but it doesn`t mean it was better in its fighting capabilities. So, i think someone misunderstand the point of view of soviet soldiers.

By: Oberonium

Oberonium — Fri, 12 Dec 2014 08:34:49 +0000

Then meds will be no longer needed

By: Ionor Rea

Ionor Rea — Fri, 12 Dec 2014 08:21:46 +0000

shada:
Customers generally aren’t too happy if are considered by company as testing platform instead of folks that want to be part of testing group in common test or developers themselves.
If developers constantly telling we try this new stuff put into game and see the numbers, instead of listening to community when outcry starts about newly added features during common tests (such as platoons in IM)… they actually confirming this kind of strategy.

By: Daripuff

Daripuff — Fri, 12 Dec 2014 01:05:37 +0000

Exactly, with the 8.6 accuracy buff, snipers became so accurate they could theoretically engage opponents across the map, bit the render range prevents that. “Inaccurate” tanks became so accurate that they could reliably engage enemies out to the limit of render range, thus nullifying the advantage of an “accurate” tank.

For those who cry “but what about weak spots? Snipers can hit weak spots at range better than brawlers” I say, does a KV85 have to aim for weak spots on a Nashorn? Nope, the mere ability to hit reliably is the problem.

By: Voroseeg

Voroseeg — Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:18:48 +0000

“great speed” ayyy lmao

By: Infernal969

Infernal969 — Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:14:10 +0000

Exactly that.
RNG will punish good players and scrubs will be able to have more RNGesus-ridden games and pay for premium acc and tanks. Then SerB can buy himself more rockets and two houses on Cyprus. Simple as that.
Wait later when WG will WONDER REALLY HARD why e-sport in this game is a joke.

By: Alexander Yordanov

Alexander Yordanov — Thu, 11 Dec 2014 21:32:06 +0000

Object 704 was a failure due to things that do not matter in game. Same for IS-7.

We dont have a T-62 in game. We have a T-62A. A nerfed one at that (real T-62A had -7 gun depression, T-62 had -4).

Which Centurion BTW? Some cents were definitely superior to T-54/55s.

By: Alexander Yordanov

Alexander Yordanov — Thu, 11 Dec 2014 21:30:32 +0000

And German soldiers were whining their tanks were worse then the T-34 and KV-1.
You said nothing interesting :P

Also, T-54 statistics depend on the T-54 you use. Some of the early ones had 120mm frontal plates.