<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 9.5 Test 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/15/9-5-test-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/15/9-5-test-3/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex16</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/15/9-5-test-3/#comment-237078</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[alex16]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2014 17:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=20412#comment-237078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Increased brightness of enemy vehicle names on the minimap

Now they are so bright you can hardly tell wich are spoted and wich arent]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Increased brightness of enemy vehicle names on the minimap</p>
<p>Now they are so bright you can hardly tell wich are spoted and wich arent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Observer413</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/15/9-5-test-3/#comment-236835</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Observer413]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=20412#comment-236835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also, Pz4 never had 105mm gun and never fought against KV-3 or Black Prince. Or M6. And Hellcat had like 90km/h top speed on hard ground instead of 72km/h limit from the game. And german tanks surprisingly aren&#039;t randomly breaking down on winter maps.
 
My point is: historical data doesn&#039;t really play that much role in this arcade game, where tank statistics are set as a balancing factors. Historical data for this game is what pirate code was for pirates in &quot;Pirates of the carribean&quot; movie- a set of suggestions rather than laws.
I consider lowering of Pz4 top speed in 0.8.8 and adding rather useless armor as a nerf to this tank, taking out its remaining strong points.
And as such i&#039;m against it. 
 
They could do another, slower tank with those BS sideskirts and throw it out as another tier5 regular or premium tank, for all what i care. Or save it for alternate hulls. 
 
As for your point nr1, i got to say that i am the kind of guy who in games focuses more on a performance of &#039;things&#039; rather than looks, and Schurzen for me are just eyecandy, that aren&#039;t worth of the cons associated with them. 
 
That&#039;s how i see it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, Pz4 never had 105mm gun and never fought against KV-3 or Black Prince. Or M6. And Hellcat had like 90km/h top speed on hard ground instead of 72km/h limit from the game. And german tanks surprisingly aren&#8217;t randomly breaking down on winter maps.</p>
<p>My point is: historical data doesn&#8217;t really play that much role in this arcade game, where tank statistics are set as a balancing factors. Historical data for this game is what pirate code was for pirates in &#8220;Pirates of the carribean&#8221; movie- a set of suggestions rather than laws.<br />
I consider lowering of Pz4 top speed in 0.8.8 and adding rather useless armor as a nerf to this tank, taking out its remaining strong points.<br />
And as such i&#8217;m against it. </p>
<p>They could do another, slower tank with those BS sideskirts and throw it out as another tier5 regular or premium tank, for all what i care. Or save it for alternate hulls. </p>
<p>As for your point nr1, i got to say that i am the kind of guy who in games focuses more on a performance of &#8216;things&#8217; rather than looks, and Schurzen for me are just eyecandy, that aren&#8217;t worth of the cons associated with them. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s how i see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wtfcaniuse</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/15/9-5-test-3/#comment-236650</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wtfcaniuse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2014 02:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=20412#comment-236650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He wants to test the tank before buying it...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He wants to test the tank before buying it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EnslavedAtlas</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/15/9-5-test-3/#comment-236648</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EnslavedAtlas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2014 01:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=20412#comment-236648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Arties reduce the amount of possible camping spots and keep people moving&quot; - Tyraforce 2014]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Arties reduce the amount of possible camping spots and keep people moving&#8221; &#8211; Tyraforce 2014</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CounterMAN</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/15/9-5-test-3/#comment-236646</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CounterMAN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2014 00:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=20412#comment-236646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WG already sell that tank on webshop]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WG already sell that tank on webshop</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mao</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/15/9-5-test-3/#comment-236642</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mao]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2014 00:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=20412#comment-236642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is T-34-85M available for testing or only for supertesters?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is T-34-85M available for testing or only for supertesters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Legiondude</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/15/9-5-test-3/#comment-236636</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legiondude]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 23:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=20412#comment-236636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1. People had been grumbling about getting the Ausf. H hull for months since before the turret change was made(I know because I was reporting on it for NA server).
2. Well if you want to get picky about the speed, there&#039;s actually grounds to make it slower. Ausf. H was weighed down by the schurzen which reduced it&#039;s top speed to 38. WG gave it the Ausf. G top speed. Ausf. E and F1 were the fastest of the Pz4 series at 42 kph, and after that it gradually got slower.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. People had been grumbling about getting the Ausf. H hull for months since before the turret change was made(I know because I was reporting on it for NA server).<br />
2. Well if you want to get picky about the speed, there&#8217;s actually grounds to make it slower. Ausf. H was weighed down by the schurzen which reduced it&#8217;s top speed to 38. WG gave it the Ausf. G top speed. Ausf. E and F1 were the fastest of the Pz4 series at 42 kph, and after that it gradually got slower.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: konradboski</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/15/9-5-test-3/#comment-236634</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[konradboski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 23:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=20412#comment-236634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[nothing info removing any premium vehicle from game-client?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nothing info removing any premium vehicle from game-client?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evanescence</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/15/9-5-test-3/#comment-236628</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Evanescence]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 23:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=20412#comment-236628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where&#039;s Woras? I begin to miss his funny comments :(]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where&#8217;s Woras? I begin to miss his funny comments :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yurra</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/15/9-5-test-3/#comment-236609</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yurra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 22:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=20412#comment-236609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FV 183 should have been the slower, heavily armored Death Star, and the 4005 a zippy glass Death Star. But WG went full retard and made them the worst 2 T10 TDs. And they nerfed the 4005 in test 2. It was even nicely balanced.

Stupid WG y u no like brits?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FV 183 should have been the slower, heavily armored Death Star, and the 4005 a zippy glass Death Star. But WG went full retard and made them the worst 2 T10 TDs. And they nerfed the 4005 in test 2. It was even nicely balanced.</p>
<p>Stupid WG y u no like brits?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
