Comments on: World’s Most Powerful Militaries

By: red_warning

red_warning — Thu, 18 Dec 2014 18:36:38 +0000

Close to removing it? You haven’t been following the debate then, there is an overwhelming support for increased funding.

By: Kenji

Kenji — Wed, 17 Dec 2014 14:46:15 +0000

Read the news kid !
They don’t want your bullshit !
They’ve signed up for 126 Rafales !

See ?
You’re the one who tells bullshit !

http://www.defensenews.com/article/20141201/DEFREG03/312010014/India-France-Agree-Finalize-Rafale-Deal-by-Spring

Now gtfu and stop anoying people with your “knowledge”

By: StetoGuy

StetoGuy — Wed, 17 Dec 2014 13:12:24 +0000

‘Numbers mean nothing’ yea if I remember the last time it was quality vs quantity, quantity won… E.g German vs USSR, Russians weren’t the best trained or well equipped against the well equipped battle hardened German troops, but when you outnumber an enemy 10 to 1 I’m pretty sure that’s when numbers matter…

By: Против Глобал

Против Глобал — Wed, 17 Dec 2014 09:22:41 +0000

What a joke! North Korea should be like 15th on the list, not 35th!

Plus, China has less nuclear warheads than UK, not more. Israel has around 300 or more. And so on…

By: kam7r

kam7r — Wed, 17 Dec 2014 09:13:23 +0000

the brazilian CV is an old french CV, the clemenceau or something who was to be scrapped and brazil bought it to repair/modernize it

By: kam7r

kam7r — Wed, 17 Dec 2014 09:03:53 +0000

eurofighter typhoon is a crap plane that can”t even land on an aircraft carrier, better buy the rafale M

By: Brenthos

Brenthos — Wed, 17 Dec 2014 05:31:40 +0000

I live in one of thevabovementioned countries, and aware af the facts regarding some of the numbers in this table, and llet me tell you – they are a long way from the truth. In some cases much higher, in some lower.
And also, they don’t take into account two things: the size of the reserve, and the main probable enemy, which this data should be compared to. I mean, UK will not fight against the US, so why compare them?

By: Emmity

Emmity — Wed, 17 Dec 2014 00:59:38 +0000

US has more like 19 carriers. Some of those are relatively smaller than the super carriers but still about the same size as other countries main carriers. These smaller carriers can still carry 20 Harriers when used in that role and are heavier than the carriers employed by France and Brazil, for example.

By: zeroyuki9221

zeroyuki9221 — Tue, 16 Dec 2014 21:45:04 +0000

Well, in defensive battle Indonesia would be a very though nut to crack, much harder than middle east at least. Did they also count terrain situation and civilian abilities into the chart? lol.

Kinda chuckling when I imagined something like… US carrier drowned itself because “SUDDEN INDONESIAN ‘MILITIA’ SCAVENGING THE CARRIER HULL FROM BELOW”

Not really sure about offensive, though. I don’t think we have any reliable capability to even cross our armies to AUS, for example. It’s not like a 1vs1 scenario will happen in our modern world anyway.

By: Killaxx

Killaxx — Tue, 16 Dec 2014 20:01:06 +0000

Wow! after all the terrorists the Syrian Army had to deal with, it is still ranked #26. Go SAA!
#SyrianArmyBestArmy