Comments on: 17.12.2014

By: Observer413

Observer413 — Fri, 19 Dec 2014 23:22:00 +0000

No no no you don’t get it- you enter RB with loose goal of either having fun, or simply grinding some tank/crew/creds at your own pace. It may go fast, it may go slow, but you will surely get there eventually, with or without competent team.

In IM your succes would be tied significantly more to performance of that random potato of a platoonmate you would get, so its on another level compared to RBs where you don’t have to stick with same ppl for long time.

I’m sure this would bring a lot more of emotions connected with the game :D

By: SuperSpy

SuperSpy — Fri, 19 Dec 2014 06:05:22 +0000

admit*

By: lukefas

lukefas — Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:27:38 +0000

>some player claimed that whenever he has a longer break from WoT, when he returns he always ends up on the top of the team – according to developers, this is just conspiracy theory, there’s no such feature

Try this stuff yourself, take a two week break and then enjoy your 90% WR for a day.

By: Kenji

Kenji — Thu, 18 Dec 2014 10:45:37 +0000

+1
I have to say it’s a good theory !

But the guy who has made the answer is an asshole, an autistic or an idiot

By: EnderXen

EnderXen — Thu, 18 Dec 2014 10:09:16 +0000

Ok, other point of view about anus word.

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/anus

By: Kenji

Kenji — Thu, 18 Dec 2014 08:03:10 +0000

“- Q: “Why not have the individual missions work automatically without having to accept the mission manually?” A: “And it would be even better, if the past battles counted as well, yes? I’d just start the game and all the missions would just get completed.””

Looks like WG accepts austistics now. Good job ! You can be proud of you !

“- some player claimed that whenever he has a longer break from WoT, when he returns he always ends up on the top of the team – according to developers, this is just conspiracy theory, there’s no such feature”

Everytime I’ve got the same feeling. AFK for a while = Always on the top

By: Kenji

Kenji — Thu, 18 Dec 2014 08:00:28 +0000

Looks like yeah

By: eNumbra

eNumbra — Thu, 18 Dec 2014 06:22:21 +0000

- Q: “Why not have the individual missions work automatically without having to accept the mission manually?” A: “And it would be even better, if the past battles counted as well, yes? I’d just start the game and all the missions would just get completed.”

So Wargaming only hires Autistics for answering player Q’s now?

By: aria8

aria8 — Thu, 18 Dec 2014 05:49:23 +0000

“- Q: ‘Why not have the individual missions work automatically without having to accept the mission manually?’ A: ‘And it would be even better, if the past battles counted as well, yes? I’d just start the game and all the missions would just get completed.’”
So exactly how come they couldn’t give us an honest answer for this one? It’s not like it’s some entitled shit question.

By: S05UGI

S05UGI — Thu, 18 Dec 2014 05:35:47 +0000

E25 aint a tank that mkes money its a shity tank i had it and doesnt worth the cost when u play e25 its better to have a platoon of them in rest is the biggest prin of …. That u ever seen