Comments on: The Results of WoWs Test…

By: WaffulMann

WaffulMann — Fri, 19 Dec 2014 13:39:34 +0000

Dude, Iowa was a late war ship, at that time most of the best of the Jap navy had died.

By: Austrian guy

Austrian guy — Fri, 19 Dec 2014 12:25:48 +0000

Its such a good game even in this early stage. I had so much fun playing it this weekend, more than in wot. In cant wait to closed beta :D

By: Bennyboymothman

Bennyboymothman — Fri, 19 Dec 2014 11:29:18 +0000

Looking forward to the next testing event! It was a nice experience and had some lovely unique features that I cannot divulge with here sadly.

By: Squadman45

Squadman45 — Fri, 19 Dec 2014 10:49:47 +0000

CLs were the class with more variants in WWII… you have japanese CLs that were more big DDs based in torpedos not in guns like western designs (very few japanese CLs with the classic 4 double turrets) but well for them work very well as leaders in DDs flotillas.

CAs… well here for me the best WWII CAs were japanese and german specially japanese even when they had worst armor compared with USA CAs BUT they use torpedos and using them were simple superior to USA CAs

One thing about CAs is that they were a WWII class, in WWI the CAs was totally diferent… they were the obsolete Armored Cruisers with no room in BB fights or VS faster classes like CLs and DDs but in WWII CA redesigned as a buffed CL worked very well and well, they were the best carrier scorts because have the speed to follow them and provide a good AAA cover, not like dedicated CLAA class but at least they can engage heavier classes.

BBs in WWII were a little useless even when compared with WWI BBs increase a lot speed (in WWI they move at 20-21 and in WWII they move around 30… in WWII BBs pass WWI BCs in speed usually).

CAs for me are going to be the medium class from WOT, letal when attack in groups or as ninja killers not using guns maybe VS BBs but using torpedos… navies with good torpedo options for their CAs are going to rule over a lot of classes BUT armored CAs based in guns can counter them.

By: KawashimaKei

KawashimaKei — Fri, 19 Dec 2014 10:04:33 +0000

dull? let me see,, i would be surprise if you survive an attack from CV

By: KawashimaKei

KawashimaKei — Fri, 19 Dec 2014 10:02:39 +0000

too bad he failed in Midway :P

By: KawashimaKei

KawashimaKei — Fri, 19 Dec 2014 10:00:48 +0000

CL can’t punch BB armor with those gun,, that why the torpedoes exist,, and they can jam the DD too,, while the CA have a good and decent AA (and their gun aren’t half bad,, pretty decent i must say),, jack-of-all-trade ship

By: Variavespasa

Variavespasa — Fri, 19 Dec 2014 08:54:19 +0000

Or perhaps they just liked what they saw? Isnt that possible also? Or does your prejudiced view not allow for that concept?

I did seriously consider proposing to the tier 4 japanese cruiser though, so I may be wierd…

By: Variavespasa

Variavespasa — Fri, 19 Dec 2014 08:51:10 +0000

I was a weekend tester, and while the NDA says I cant say much, I *can* say I played a lot and on all three days, which some may regard as suggestive of my opinion… :P

Not sure why they’re saying 2 days or 48 hours so much though- it was at least 54 hours and maybe 55, not that I was complaining. :)

Sorta happy theyre not doing another one till the 20th of january or so. It would pose a serious threat to my schedule for the WZ-111 missions… :P

By: Lance Chen

Lance Chen — Thu, 18 Dec 2014 23:09:32 +0000

SS. Since you already admitted that you are not familiar with naval things, you should either stay focus on stronk tonks or read more about naval battles to appreciate it. ships are harder to get compared to tanks when you don’t know them well.