<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Straight Outta Supertest: T-54 &#8220;First Prototype&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/26/straight-outta-supertest-t-54-first-prototype/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/26/straight-outta-supertest-t-54-first-prototype/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: aria8</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/26/straight-outta-supertest-t-54-first-prototype/#comment-241950</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aria8]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 02:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=20771#comment-241950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I didn&#039;t say that I wouldn&#039;t use gold ammo on tier 10s just because I can easily play the SU-122-44 without gold ammo even in tier 9 battles. It&#039;s just that getting tier 10 battles in the T-54 proto wouldn&#039;t be so bad that I&#039;d just gold spam.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t say that I wouldn&#8217;t use gold ammo on tier 10s just because I can easily play the SU-122-44 without gold ammo even in tier 9 battles. It&#8217;s just that getting tier 10 battles in the T-54 proto wouldn&#8217;t be so bad that I&#8217;d just gold spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett1824</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/26/straight-outta-supertest-t-54-first-prototype/#comment-241931</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brett1824]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2014 22:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=20771#comment-241931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So every thing -44 and -54 based is -44 clone then by your logic?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So every thing -44 and -54 based is -44 clone then by your logic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polkadot9000</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/26/straight-outta-supertest-t-54-first-prototype/#comment-241919</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Polkadot9000]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2014 20:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=20771#comment-241919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unless this gets preferential matchmaking or good HEAT/APCR shells then this tank is going to be pretty bad.  as to aria8, well make an SU-122-44 penetration gun work against tier X, it will be as bad as the T69 without HEAT or APCR or whatever its premium shell is if it goes up against tier X tanks. They seem to have come out recently against the favourable mm tanks recently. The E-25 has been removed from sale for being too numerous and too good, the Panther 88 has been made a non-preferential MM tank despite it being basically an FCM 50t but as a german MT and they probably won&#039;t make this tank a preferential MM tank.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless this gets preferential matchmaking or good HEAT/APCR shells then this tank is going to be pretty bad.  as to aria8, well make an SU-122-44 penetration gun work against tier X, it will be as bad as the T69 without HEAT or APCR or whatever its premium shell is if it goes up against tier X tanks. They seem to have come out recently against the favourable mm tanks recently. The E-25 has been removed from sale for being too numerous and too good, the Panther 88 has been made a non-preferential MM tank despite it being basically an FCM 50t but as a german MT and they probably won&#8217;t make this tank a preferential MM tank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aria8</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/26/straight-outta-supertest-t-54-first-prototype/#comment-241839</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aria8]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2014 15:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=20771#comment-241839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;d be great if this tank gets preferential mm, but I don&#039;t think it will since that&#039;s one of the reasons why the Type 59 got removed. Regardless, I think I can work with it even in a tier 10 match if I can make the SU-122-44 work in a tier 9 battle without using gold ammo.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;d be great if this tank gets preferential mm, but I don&#8217;t think it will since that&#8217;s one of the reasons why the Type 59 got removed. Regardless, I think I can work with it even in a tier 10 match if I can make the SU-122-44 work in a tier 9 battle without using gold ammo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mao</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/26/straight-outta-supertest-t-54-first-prototype/#comment-241831</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mao]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2014 15:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=20771#comment-241831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[122-44 is based on 44
122-54 is based on 54
T-54 is based on T-44 so... yeah :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>122-44 is based on 44<br />
122-54 is based on 54<br />
T-54 is based on T-44 so&#8230; yeah :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett1824</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/26/straight-outta-supertest-t-54-first-prototype/#comment-241824</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brett1824]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2014 14:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=20771#comment-241824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pretty sure SU-122-44 is based on T-44 and not T-54]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty sure SU-122-44 is based on T-44 and not T-54</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steffenximus</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/26/straight-outta-supertest-t-54-first-prototype/#comment-241819</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steffenximus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2014 14:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=20771#comment-241819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Much better than Type 59, it seems. Great, another Type hysteria, glad I&#039;ll miss it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much better than Type 59, it seems. Great, another Type hysteria, glad I&#8217;ll miss it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: netherprime</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/26/straight-outta-supertest-t-54-first-prototype/#comment-241810</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[netherprime]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2014 14:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=20771#comment-241810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[unicums will hate this tank dude, it&#039;s not very mobile, has a shit gun while the only redeeming quality the tank has is it&#039;s armour which isn&#039;t a reason to buy it lol]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>unicums will hate this tank dude, it&#8217;s not very mobile, has a shit gun while the only redeeming quality the tank has is it&#8217;s armour which isn&#8217;t a reason to buy it lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AsG_Alligator</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/26/straight-outta-supertest-t-54-first-prototype/#comment-241740</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AsG_Alligator]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2014 12:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=20771#comment-241740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great... More T-54 clones...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great&#8230; More T-54 clones&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UselessBanana</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/26/straight-outta-supertest-t-54-first-prototype/#comment-241707</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[UselessBanana]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2014 11:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=20771#comment-241707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the type-59&#039;s first designation was actually WZ-120, it is the type-59]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the type-59&#8242;s first designation was actually WZ-120, it is the type-59</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
