Comments on: T-54 Prototype – Historical Data

By: Chad Mesiroff

Chad Mesiroff — Thu, 01 Jan 2015 05:21:09 +0000

Yep, it was slow as dogshit, so is the 120mm hulled T54 in game supposed to be.

Also 1700 RPM was pushing it hard :)

Same US engine was 10 liters or about 600 cubic inches less and put out 800 HP vs 560 HP, it also revved to 2200 RPM. Did I mention it was lighter :)

By: Chad Mesiroff

Chad Mesiroff — Thu, 01 Jan 2015 05:19:02 +0000

OMG, you are doing it wrong. It is laser beram shooting hovertank with extra 200 HP it shouldnt have.

By: Chad Mesiroff

Chad Mesiroff — Thu, 01 Jan 2015 05:17:56 +0000

Chinese are not even close to Rus tanks.

113 vs IS7 is hands down IS7.

121 vs 140 or 62a or even the worst 430 or 907= Ru Meds any day and twice on sundays.

Chinese arty vs 261 thats not a cheating heatshot machine with the “Legal Arty Mod”….Oh wait

Point is Ru tanks are much much more powerful, the problem is so many RU players are reds and since its x4 the population of other servers those Reds get the 62a/140 and or IS7 as first tanks keeping there stats artificially low.

Go look at WOTLABS solo challenges. Bigcheese from NA server goes to EU with IS7 and SOLO gets 73% win rate with something like 3600 avg DMG…,.THis in a tank they buffed from unhistorical armor thickness and made it stronger than it was. Also making maps brawl 10x more makes IS7 and Ru meds even better at what they do.

Sorry but for the horrible depression and bad gun handling Chinese gets 0 armor advantages, and simply gets ROF increases while at high tiers not getting much alpha help at all. 113 should have 600 Alpha keep with “Chinese= huge gun”

Sorry but RU tanks will always be OP. KV1s was literally 6% higher as avg winrate and was kept that way since Beta. T54 has been OP since beta. 62a and M48 were dead even when first released. M48 was better snapshotter and OTM the 62a got better armor and camo…But nope wasnt ok s they nerfed M48 into a shit heel. Sry Rus bias is real and is stronk.

By: Chad Mesiroff

Chad Mesiroff — Thu, 01 Jan 2015 05:00:26 +0000

Please show ref of -7 for 62a. I highly doubt this. 62a still used long breechblock and low dome turret.

I just dont see anyway it was -7.

By: V1g1l4nc3

V1g1l4nc3 — Wed, 31 Dec 2014 12:50:08 +0000

Give the damned Chinese tanks the gun depression that they added to the Soviet tanks and put the hills back in the game please.

By: Vlad Pomar

Vlad Pomar — Wed, 31 Dec 2014 11:06:50 +0000

I don’t have it yet but from looking at the stats and at what youtubers say it looks very promising.I mean,decent frontal armor,very,very strong turret,good gun,good mobility,good camo….
What more could you ask?

By: Vlad Pomar

Vlad Pomar — Wed, 31 Dec 2014 11:01:42 +0000

I have the SU-122P and it is a very very good tank.The gun depression is indeed a problem,but you can work around it.

By: zapyoug

zapyoug — Wed, 31 Dec 2014 09:09:44 +0000

look at the T62a historical gun depression

By: zapyoug

zapyoug — Wed, 31 Dec 2014 08:57:53 +0000

Ive had a similar experience with the obj430 2
I recently switched to 10ap, 39 heat, 1 HE and well
it suddenly feels amazing rather than being a useless turd that I cant break 2k dmg with most of the time
That being said, with a prem account Ive been loosing anywhere beetween 10-30k credits a game depending on my accuracy and # of shells fired
(from what Ive seen the tier 10 will treat you much better with APCR standard)

By: noobz

noobz — Wed, 31 Dec 2014 05:13:04 +0000

if you hit anything below or above the gun, you stand a decent chance of a bounce i’m sure.it might go through 2 armor globs or the angle might be enough to put it over the top, hard to say exactly whats going on without tank inspector. although the cheecks are def, a shoot here spot. and i must say you are correct to shoot the turret, shooting the hull is a fools game.