Comments on: Aleksandr Ivanov Q&A

By: TheMiscellaneousMan

TheMiscellaneousMan — Sun, 04 Jan 2015 05:33:46 +0000

Agreed if you intended to say that you disagreed with zippy,
but there is no need to use a alternate mental configeration as a insult.

By: Tygrysek

Tygrysek — Sat, 03 Jan 2015 12:51:01 +0000

Well, what is wrong with you? Tier 7 scout would be actually fine in a tier IX, hell, even tier X battle…

By: Woras

Woras — Sat, 03 Jan 2015 10:19:09 +0000

Some will go to scrap pixelyard.

By: rosszpenz

rosszpenz — Sat, 03 Jan 2015 09:37:43 +0000

Yeah, but if they want to make tank classes to be the “rock-paper-scissors” thing, they should make maps to be a “rock-paper-scissors” thing too. There should be maps that favor TDs or HTs too.
Instead they nerfed HTs, then arty, then TDs, then maps and now they are willing to nerf viewrange and “high pen guns” which will be the TX meds I guess. And then the circle closes and they can start all over again. :/

By: WaffulMann

WaffulMann — Sat, 03 Jan 2015 09:15:43 +0000

get something that’s not win98, should cost less than half a month’s salary, min wage of any country.

By: Chris Jojo

Chris Jojo — Sat, 03 Jan 2015 07:44:16 +0000

Lets face it War Gaming is run and programmed by hacks. Their RnG sucks, they program in power creep but say they will never use tier 11s (Lets face it some of those auto loaders are 11s all ready. They cant balance the teams? really what crap. Even a basic winrate and damage per game type matchmaking balancing system would be easy enough for some straight out of school programmer to do. They are screwing up the game more and more. Two games ago my JPZE100 bounced off of a Centurion 1 then proceed to wide shot one aimed and close shots 5 times before bouncing off of a t62 broad side then its commander copula. yup I aimed i waited i missed point blank shots. Way to go RNG BS from serb. This game isnt half the fun it used to be

By: Brenthos

Brenthos — Sat, 03 Jan 2015 07:20:33 +0000

This is exactly what I don’t get – once they say they will just remove bad maps, and we will have less maps (only the ones they consider good), and now they say they will juat replace bad ones.

Or, do they know their math, and they mean that all maps are bad, some will be replaced, some will be removed for good?

By: _Putin

_Putin — Sat, 03 Jan 2015 05:14:58 +0000

you’re literally autistic

By: Nadeah

Nadeah — Sat, 03 Jan 2015 02:35:39 +0000

WG balanced platoon matchmaking like accordingly: WG: ''Platoons have increased matchmaking weight and therefore are bottom tier more often.'' ''What about tier 10 platoons?'' WG: ''What about them?'' ''Right to own'' is fun, but having two 3-man unicrum platoons versus a sea of red isn't fun for reds nor the unicrums and the yellows and greens on both teams suffer the most probably since they are good enough to know that the game is going to be lopsided but bad enough to not be able to influence it almost all the time. Extra points if the sea of reds has 3 top tier tanks with a below 46% winrate of which one is blue for teamdamage before the match started.

By: TankaTed

TankaTed — Sat, 03 Jan 2015 01:10:59 +0000

Anime kiddie porn? You make me sick.