<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 4.1.2015</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/04/4-1-2015/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/04/4-1-2015/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sapphirestar</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/04/4-1-2015/#comment-245125</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sapphirestar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2015 12:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21001#comment-245125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[no they just off their meds or back on them...now i am not sure which but judging from what WG has done over last few month&#039;s i would say some of both but mostly i think WG needs some one to give them a clue that they need to get a clue and not the board game clue cause i get the feeling they would think that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no they just off their meds or back on them&#8230;now i am not sure which but judging from what WG has done over last few month&#8217;s i would say some of both but mostly i think WG needs some one to give them a clue that they need to get a clue and not the board game clue cause i get the feeling they would think that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KawashimaKei</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/04/4-1-2015/#comment-245026</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KawashimaKei]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2015 07:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21001#comment-245026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[those high angle on SFL (the TD with FlaK gun on Pz IV) won&#039;t be usefull,, although it can hit those scout plane,, GG WP WG,, now no need to use LT anymore,, just launch those planes and let it spot for you]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>those high angle on SFL (the TD with FlaK gun on Pz IV) won&#8217;t be usefull,, although it can hit those scout plane,, GG WP WG,, now no need to use LT anymore,, just launch those planes and let it spot for you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WaffulMann</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/04/4-1-2015/#comment-245008</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WaffulMann]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2015 03:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21001#comment-245008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[inb4 gold only]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>inb4 gold only</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WorldsDawn</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/04/4-1-2015/#comment-244994</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WorldsDawn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2015 00:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21001#comment-244994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But... but...but... I like my chinese tanks D:

And I think most of them are played differently like the russian counterpart.
110  IS-3
WZ-120  T-54
113  IS-7
 
Low tiers? Yeah i give you that, but hightiers are unique in playstyle :(]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But&#8230; but&#8230;but&#8230; I like my chinese tanks D:</p>
<p>And I think most of them are played differently like the russian counterpart.<br />
110  IS-3<br />
WZ-120  T-54<br />
113  IS-7</p>
<p>Low tiers? Yeah i give you that, but hightiers are unique in playstyle :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grumpy_Stranger</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/04/4-1-2015/#comment-244986</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grumpy_Stranger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2015 23:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21001#comment-244986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because it&#039;s such a huge stretch of imagination to realize that premium tanks and branch tanks have different rules they have to adhere to.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because it&#8217;s such a huge stretch of imagination to realize that premium tanks and branch tanks have different rules they have to adhere to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: echoron333</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/04/4-1-2015/#comment-244973</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[echoron333]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2015 22:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21001#comment-244973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;On EU servers WG is not going to publish list of prohibited mods, so you can use them and not be banned. WG leave decision of using them or not using them to your conscience.&quot;
- time to go back to tier 5/6 tanks, because the higher the tier, the more Warpack players u will encounter...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;On EU servers WG is not going to publish list of prohibited mods, so you can use them and not be banned. WG leave decision of using them or not using them to your conscience.&#8221;<br />
- time to go back to tier 5/6 tanks, because the higher the tier, the more Warpack players u will encounter&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: poka_EU</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/04/4-1-2015/#comment-244967</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[poka_EU]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2015 22:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21001#comment-244967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They just said they don&#039;t. Read it one more time please.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They just said they don&#8217;t. Read it one more time please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Awesometankdriver</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/04/4-1-2015/#comment-244963</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Awesometankdriver]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2015 22:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21001#comment-244963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- recon plane is a plane circling high above and scouting enemy tanks. It cannot be shot down and it sees everything.


So basicly it is like arty?:P]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- recon plane is a plane circling high above and scouting enemy tanks. It cannot be shot down and it sees everything.</p>
<p>So basicly it is like arty?:P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeanPwnery</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/04/4-1-2015/#comment-244957</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SeanPwnery]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2015 22:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21001#comment-244957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- there was a bigger Ensk map, but big maps are huge problem for devs, because some tanks will be useless there eg Maus or TOG II

Duh - make the battle times twice as long, and the teams twice as large.
It&#039;s not like if the battle was longer the earnings potential wouldn&#039;t be higher with more people to kill, more land to &quot;scout&quot;, and more ground to cover. I won&#039;t even get into how easily this will solve 99% of the artillery hate/whining/bitching that never ceases to end since the time-on-target for arcing shells would multiply exponentially (direct hits would only affect the hardest of camper).

These excuses (which is exactly what they are) - are just a feeble attempt to keep the game &quot;dumbed down to the lowest player&quot; - or the &quot;instant gratification&quot; type player.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- there was a bigger Ensk map, but big maps are huge problem for devs, because some tanks will be useless there eg Maus or TOG II</p>
<p>Duh &#8211; make the battle times twice as long, and the teams twice as large.<br />
It&#8217;s not like if the battle was longer the earnings potential wouldn&#8217;t be higher with more people to kill, more land to &#8220;scout&#8221;, and more ground to cover. I won&#8217;t even get into how easily this will solve 99% of the artillery hate/whining/bitching that never ceases to end since the time-on-target for arcing shells would multiply exponentially (direct hits would only affect the hardest of camper).</p>
<p>These excuses (which is exactly what they are) &#8211; are just a feeble attempt to keep the game &#8220;dumbed down to the lowest player&#8221; &#8211; or the &#8220;instant gratification&#8221; type player.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 23r0_NA</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/04/4-1-2015/#comment-244951</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[23r0_NA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2015 21:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21001#comment-244951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;- Japanese TDs are to be expected sooner than Chinese due to the latter ones being mostly Soviet clones (and WG doesn’t want more clones in the game), neither will come in 2015&quot;

inb4 more T-54 and T-62A clones for the Soviets by the end of 2015.



&quot;- bomber air raid arrives after 20-30 seconds, the bombs count as HEAT shells with very high damage and penetration, falling directly from above&quot;

This doesn&#039;t make any sense.  They should count as regular HE shells that have a wider than usual splash radius and greater damage upon a direct penetrating hit, unless these are explicitly stated to be hollow-charge bombs (like the German SD 4).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;- Japanese TDs are to be expected sooner than Chinese due to the latter ones being mostly Soviet clones (and WG doesn’t want more clones in the game), neither will come in 2015&#8243;</p>
<p>inb4 more T-54 and T-62A clones for the Soviets by the end of 2015.</p>
<p>&#8220;- bomber air raid arrives after 20-30 seconds, the bombs count as HEAT shells with very high damage and penetration, falling directly from above&#8221;</p>
<p>This doesn&#8217;t make any sense.  They should count as regular HE shells that have a wider than usual splash radius and greater damage upon a direct penetrating hit, unless these are explicitly stated to be hollow-charge bombs (like the German SD 4).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
