Comments on: Armored Warfare Requirements Published – Higher Than WoT

By: mechtank_hero

mechtank_hero — Sun, 11 Jan 2015 16:00:31 +0000

another un-educated WOT player raging / jealous on AW .huh.

By: Lewis Dawson

Lewis Dawson — Sat, 10 Jan 2015 14:00:56 +0000

You obviously have no idea at all about World of Tanks and how un-optimized it is.

It’s engine is terrible. It’s optimization is terible, it’s developers are terrbile, and that’s why you’ve ended up with the shit, which is World of tanks.

There’s a reason why I can run BF4 at max, but no WoT. Because world of tanks is utter shite. End of. The developers haven’t even bothered to optimize the game at any point. With their excuse for not adding small new features being “technical problems”. Hmm… let me think, why is that? Ohh yeah, a shity dev team and a shity engine matched with even shitier servers.

“the 2nd generation i7, mainstream CPUs of the newest generation that are cheap can crush anything previously released at games and they also have no problems taking WoT up to 140 of constant frames per second when paired with a potent GPU”. Lol biggest piece of crap i’ve ever heard. The CPU could Potentially take it up to 140fps, but you need more than a “Potent” GPU. You need a ridiculous GPU, to run it on Max. For the price you pay, i’d rather play something like Minecraft, which looks better. WoT doesn’t look fantastic at all. The HD models, maybe, but that’s about it, lmao.

AW has already reached the graphical fedility considered “Great” in CryEngine 3. Go and watch a gameplay trailer, then maybe it will stop the shit pouring at of your mouth. Just maybe.

“You will not turn crap into gold with multicore support and you will have a close to 0% increase in performance even if they completely optimize it for multi core.”
I think you’ll find you’d see a huge performance boost if they added Multi-core support. Mainly because the game runs on a single core, which is ludicrous. Close to “0%” my ass. The Multi-core support is the main thing that is missing from the game, you ignorant fool. You have no idea what you’re talking about. Go educate yourself.

By: Lewis Dawson

Lewis Dawson — Sat, 10 Jan 2015 13:43:30 +0000

This is extremely low, considering CryEngine is quite demanding in most games. Taking into consideration, it has Multi-core support, probably tessellation etc. It’s gonna be great.

Well, i’m not complaining at all. this will slaughter WoT as a game in terms of content and performance, and I can’t wait to see the looks on the Developers faces when they lose some of their fanbase.

It will be hilarious.

By: jerv

jerv — Sat, 10 Jan 2015 06:01:46 +0000

At 640*480 maybe. I’ve tried on more powerful systems and couldn’t hit 10 FPS at 1366*768.

By: jerv

jerv — Sat, 10 Jan 2015 06:00:04 +0000

I bought a GTX465 a little over 3 years ago. It was ~$100, so we’re talking around $30 a year. Right now, a Radeon R7 260 can get you about the same performance I get for $90. Buy carefullly though, as the R7 250 is $5 cheaper but only half as powerful.

The great thing about cards around $100-ish is that they tend to be powerful enough to remain relevant for years without emptying your wallet the way the high-end cards do.

The only ones that need to replace their GPU more than once every few years are those that are so determined to remain on the cutting edge that they would sell their mother for an extra 0.3 FPS, or those that have a nasty habit of overheating their systems and frying their cards.

By: jerv

jerv — Sat, 10 Jan 2015 05:48:34 +0000

If you get much older than my i3-530, you have issues. I think it safe to say that, if you run a system more than about five years old, you shouldn’t expect to run recent software, especially not games.

By: jerv

jerv — Sat, 10 Jan 2015 05:44:41 +0000

You assume people buy new computers when the old one isn’t broken, and that all gamers use desktop systems. One thing that surprises me when I see people list the specs on their system is how many people still run Core2 or older systems; I thought my i3-530 was old!
More importantly, a lot of casual gamers don’t get why their integrated graphics aren’t enough for actual gaming. This is especially common amongst those who value compact/portable systems over graphical prowess; in other words, laptop users.
Still , the small difference in requirements compared to the performance calls the antique engine WG insists on re-using into question.

By: SturmButcher

SturmButcher — Fri, 09 Jan 2015 22:44:08 +0000

All of you have to be kidding…. this game requirements are way too low if we compared the powerfull cryengine with the obsoleted pos bigcrap engine… a 8600gts? come on that vga have at least 7-8 years… a core 2 duo? really? its way too low… if you dont have money to upgrade your pc to at least a 500 usd pc, then work part time like many do and I did in the past, now at least I have a decent job, and I can afford a 2k usd pc, now I cant complain about pc requirements, but seriusly, gaming is not for all, if you can’t afford it, go to play outside with the trees.

By: Dr. Pub Nobrains

Dr. Pub Nobrains — Fri, 09 Jan 2015 19:54:12 +0000

“whats so special about the Russian Putin Dictatorship?”
That uneducated people call it a dictatorship. Really, the main thing that makes Putin special is how demonized he is. Putin and Obama have the same amount of control over their respective country.

By: SectR

SectR — Fri, 09 Jan 2015 18:57:50 +0000

The level of these comments is lower than the skill level of the WoT global community…

How the h did most of these people even manage to buy a PC, any kind of PC. You even have oblivious ones with PCs more than capable of running WoT at 120 fps without any frame drops and the term they did not yet learn since they aren’t of age, stutter, besides actual lag that can’t be helped some days, complaining that WoT doesn’t run great when it’s most likely their uselessness at managing their own PC.

Even worse, people still think that multicore support will help their obsolete PCs run WoT better. To give you an idea of what obsolete means, oblivious people, obsolete is something like the 2nd generation i7, mainstream CPUs of the newest generation that are cheap can crush anything previously released at games and they also have no problems taking WoT up to 140 of constant frames per second when paired with a potent GPU, because yes despite the stupid comments around here, WoT does look fantastic even if not at the level of CryEngine 3 which even AW is far from reaching. You will not turn crap into gold with multicore support and you will have a close to 0% increase in performance even if they completely optimize it for multi core.