<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Straight Outta Supertest: FV201/A45 British Premium HT7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/13/straight-outta-supertest-fv201a45-british-premium-ht7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/13/straight-outta-supertest-fv201a45-british-premium-ht7/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolfie</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/13/straight-outta-supertest-fv201a45-british-premium-ht7/#comment-249499</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolfie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2015 07:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21288#comment-249499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll stick with my BP NOPE thank you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll stick with my BP NOPE thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madner Kami</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/13/straight-outta-supertest-fv201a45-british-premium-ht7/#comment-248866</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Madner Kami]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2015 00:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21288#comment-248866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And better armor and better speed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And better armor and better speed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madner Kami</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/13/straight-outta-supertest-fv201a45-british-premium-ht7/#comment-248864</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Madner Kami]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2015 00:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21288#comment-248864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s the Caernarvon Prototype (aka Caernarvon Mk1). Only 1 was ever built and the project was further developed into the Caernarvon Mk2, which is what we have ingame.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the Caernarvon Prototype (aka Caernarvon Mk1). Only 1 was ever built and the project was further developed into the Caernarvon Mk2, which is what we have ingame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madner Kami</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/13/straight-outta-supertest-fv201a45-british-premium-ht7/#comment-248862</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Madner Kami]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2015 00:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21288#comment-248862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just no. The FV201 or A45 was planned with the 20 Pounder, not the 17 Pounder. The 17 Pounder was *only* used on the FV221 (Caernarvon Mk1), which was the A45 hull, married with a Centurion Mk2 turret and using the 17 Pounder. The FV201/A45 would be A45 hull, any Centurion turret and 20 Pounder, which never happened.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just no. The FV201 or A45 was planned with the 20 Pounder, not the 17 Pounder. The 17 Pounder was *only* used on the FV221 (Caernarvon Mk1), which was the A45 hull, married with a Centurion Mk2 turret and using the 17 Pounder. The FV201/A45 would be A45 hull, any Centurion turret and 20 Pounder, which never happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tobi_1989</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/13/straight-outta-supertest-fv201a45-british-premium-ht7/#comment-248810</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tobi_1989]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 20:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21288#comment-248810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, i apologize on the Dieppe mixup, totally way to make an asshat of me.

But saying &quot;British tanks were great, they just came later than hoped for&quot; is not really way of proving they didn&#039;t suck.

Mind this: Cromwell of 1944 (yes, there was Centaur in 1942, but those things were much less mobile, considering they were powered by Crusader&#039;s Liberty engine, yet almost as heavy as future Cromwells) was in most matters equal (or veeery slightly superior) to T-34 of 1940.

Gun- about equal
Armour- comparable
Agility- comparable, maybe slightly better
Top speed &amp; acceleration- okay, better
User-friendliness and ergonomy- i admit, way better, as it didn&#039;t need hammer to change gears and was generally more comfortable for its crew - something ruskies never really gave a damn about.

Also, Crommies should not be compared to Pz.III, as those things were generally obsolete by 1943 and never really fought Cromwells in any considerable numbers. WH&#039;s armoured forces&#039;s backbone of 44 was Pz. IV of late models armed with L/48 and even though the tank itself was rather inferior in terms of mobility and armour protection (well hey, the gun might be from 1943, but the chasis was around since invasion of poland), its gun was clearly superior - Pz. IV was able to penetrate Cromwell&#039;s front at more than 1500m, Cromwell had to be much closer to repay the favor.

Not saying Jerry tin cans are superior (well Panthers and Tigers were... in the rare moments their gearboxes weren&#039;t broken or engines overheating y&#039;know), just saying brits had one really good gun, about equal to or slightly better than L/70 (17pdr), but were not able to field it en masse. Sure, Jerries weren&#039;t fielding /L70s and 88s en masse too, but Pak/KwK/StuK 40s were clearly superior to british 6pdrs and 75mms - in terms of long-range penetration.

as for the Centurion - i myself don&#039;t consider it War design that came too late, but as proper postwar MBT that came really early. Considering the sheer fact, that of all those early postwar designs only Centies and T-55s are still in service (and i dont mean service like in some third world country fielding 1930s-era tanks because of low budget, what i mean is proper use... well, still because of low budget, but with upgrades and modernization packages that keeps this thing badass-ish even today).
Late war design were things like IS-3, T-44 or Pershing - all quickly turned obsolete by 1st gen MBTs. Centurion was kind of hipster - he was MBT long before it was cool.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, i apologize on the Dieppe mixup, totally way to make an asshat of me.</p>
<p>But saying &#8220;British tanks were great, they just came later than hoped for&#8221; is not really way of proving they didn&#8217;t suck.</p>
<p>Mind this: Cromwell of 1944 (yes, there was Centaur in 1942, but those things were much less mobile, considering they were powered by Crusader&#8217;s Liberty engine, yet almost as heavy as future Cromwells) was in most matters equal (or veeery slightly superior) to T-34 of 1940.</p>
<p>Gun- about equal<br />
Armour- comparable<br />
Agility- comparable, maybe slightly better<br />
Top speed &amp; acceleration- okay, better<br />
User-friendliness and ergonomy- i admit, way better, as it didn&#8217;t need hammer to change gears and was generally more comfortable for its crew &#8211; something ruskies never really gave a damn about.</p>
<p>Also, Crommies should not be compared to Pz.III, as those things were generally obsolete by 1943 and never really fought Cromwells in any considerable numbers. WH&#8217;s armoured forces&#8217;s backbone of 44 was Pz. IV of late models armed with L/48 and even though the tank itself was rather inferior in terms of mobility and armour protection (well hey, the gun might be from 1943, but the chasis was around since invasion of poland), its gun was clearly superior &#8211; Pz. IV was able to penetrate Cromwell&#8217;s front at more than 1500m, Cromwell had to be much closer to repay the favor.</p>
<p>Not saying Jerry tin cans are superior (well Panthers and Tigers were&#8230; in the rare moments their gearboxes weren&#8217;t broken or engines overheating y&#8217;know), just saying brits had one really good gun, about equal to or slightly better than L/70 (17pdr), but were not able to field it en masse. Sure, Jerries weren&#8217;t fielding /L70s and 88s en masse too, but Pak/KwK/StuK 40s were clearly superior to british 6pdrs and 75mms &#8211; in terms of long-range penetration.</p>
<p>as for the Centurion &#8211; i myself don&#8217;t consider it War design that came too late, but as proper postwar MBT that came really early. Considering the sheer fact, that of all those early postwar designs only Centies and T-55s are still in service (and i dont mean service like in some third world country fielding 1930s-era tanks because of low budget, what i mean is proper use&#8230; well, still because of low budget, but with upgrades and modernization packages that keeps this thing badass-ish even today).<br />
Late war design were things like IS-3, T-44 or Pershing &#8211; all quickly turned obsolete by 1st gen MBTs. Centurion was kind of hipster &#8211; he was MBT long before it was cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Landric</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/13/straight-outta-supertest-fv201a45-british-premium-ht7/#comment-248798</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Landric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 20:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21288#comment-248798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I seem to remember another tier seven tank with 1500 hit points, what was it?  Oh yes, the Tiger I.  Which also gets a gun with 32mm more pen and 90 more damage per shot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I seem to remember another tier seven tank with 1500 hit points, what was it?  Oh yes, the Tiger I.  Which also gets a gun with 32mm more pen and 90 more damage per shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Weber</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/13/straight-outta-supertest-fv201a45-british-premium-ht7/#comment-248796</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacob Weber]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 20:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21288#comment-248796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But it is a tier lower.....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But it is a tier lower&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Weber</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/13/straight-outta-supertest-fv201a45-british-premium-ht7/#comment-248795</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacob Weber]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 20:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21288#comment-248795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree. After tier 7 all the heavies have paper hull armor it is sad to say. :(]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. After tier 7 all the heavies have paper hull armor it is sad to say. :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why_me</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/13/straight-outta-supertest-fv201a45-british-premium-ht7/#comment-248760</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Why_me]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 18:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21288#comment-248760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is this anyhow related to the expected changes in the medium British line, featuring FV4202? Btw any news when this will happen?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this anyhow related to the expected changes in the medium British line, featuring FV4202? Btw any news when this will happen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thealpinist</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/13/straight-outta-supertest-fv201a45-british-premium-ht7/#comment-248729</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thealpinist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21288#comment-248729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your  gonna need prem for tier nine games like the IS which only has 4 more pen]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your  gonna need prem for tier nine games like the IS which only has 4 more pen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
