<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evilly Q&amp;A</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/18/evilly-qa-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/18/evilly-qa-3/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bugii</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/18/evilly-qa-3/#comment-251352</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bugii]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 23:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21458#comment-251352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[here, found it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uNh3xauwSeg]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>here, found it <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uNh3xauwSeg" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uNh3xauwSeg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bugii</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/18/evilly-qa-3/#comment-251199</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bugii]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 17:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21458#comment-251199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[it finally makes sense...

there is one trialer for WoT on youtube... some orcs and humans fighting.. kinda like WoW and suddenly a tank appears... It looks really strange... now it makes sense :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it finally makes sense&#8230;</p>
<p>there is one trialer for WoT on youtube&#8230; some orcs and humans fighting.. kinda like WoW and suddenly a tank appears&#8230; It looks really strange&#8230; now it makes sense :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pavel_p</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/18/evilly-qa-3/#comment-250878</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pavel_p]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21458#comment-250878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think 110 is more versatile and better for public random games - viewrange, faster aiming, some sniping ability. But when you play IS3 it doesnt matter if players are spamming gold ammo on you or not. IS3 turret is immune except weakspot above the gun, upper plate is paper against same tier anyway. When you play 110 it&#039;s immune to 220-240 pen frontally but both upper plate and turret cheeks are easily penned by golds - it will still bounce unaimed shots, but it&#039;s unlikely to win corner fights against is3 - cause of alpha, lack of side armor and worse immunity to premium ammo.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think 110 is more versatile and better for public random games &#8211; viewrange, faster aiming, some sniping ability. But when you play IS3 it doesnt matter if players are spamming gold ammo on you or not. IS3 turret is immune except weakspot above the gun, upper plate is paper against same tier anyway. When you play 110 it&#8217;s immune to 220-240 pen frontally but both upper plate and turret cheeks are easily penned by golds &#8211; it will still bounce unaimed shots, but it&#8217;s unlikely to win corner fights against is3 &#8211; cause of alpha, lack of side armor and worse immunity to premium ammo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boris</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/18/evilly-qa-3/#comment-250869</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[boris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 08:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21458#comment-250869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#039;- WG is currently working on chat overhaul, first will be the channels, followed by the contact list system. Players will be able to divide their contact lists into groups (close friends, platoon guys etc.), so it will become more flexible over time&#039;

First sentence made me think that WG finally decided to fix their shitty chat system. Next sentence confirmed their ignorance about it. Organize contact lists into groups in a shitty chat system does not change the fact that it is still utter shit.

You enter a game, and you&#039;re disconnected from the world, unlike every other MMO out there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;- WG is currently working on chat overhaul, first will be the channels, followed by the contact list system. Players will be able to divide their contact lists into groups (close friends, platoon guys etc.), so it will become more flexible over time&#8217;</p>
<p>First sentence made me think that WG finally decided to fix their shitty chat system. Next sentence confirmed their ignorance about it. Organize contact lists into groups in a shitty chat system does not change the fact that it is still utter shit.</p>
<p>You enter a game, and you&#8217;re disconnected from the world, unlike every other MMO out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spectre o UK</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/18/evilly-qa-3/#comment-250839</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spectre o UK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 01:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21458#comment-250839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#039;- 9.7 will bring new regular tanks (SS: the French)&#039;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P3ALwKeSEYs

Seriously, been waiting for this since I started actually playing WOT about 1-2 years ago. More French tanks for the collection. Now they just need to get onto the Chinese :P]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;- 9.7 will bring new regular tanks (SS: the French)&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P3ALwKeSEYs" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P3ALwKeSEYs</a></p>
<p>Seriously, been waiting for this since I started actually playing WOT about 1-2 years ago. More French tanks for the collection. Now they just need to get onto the Chinese :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AkinaGG</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/18/evilly-qa-3/#comment-250820</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AkinaGG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2015 23:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21458#comment-250820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[if I&#039;m in a weak t6 tank, Type 58/VK3001P for example, their gun can&#039;t even reliably pen the hatches of 110, but can pen -3 roof with ease especially -3&#039;s low height...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if I&#8217;m in a weak t6 tank, Type 58/VK3001P for example, their gun can&#8217;t even reliably pen the hatches of 110, but can pen -3 roof with ease especially -3&#8242;s low height&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Striker</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/18/evilly-qa-3/#comment-250818</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Striker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2015 23:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21458#comment-250818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Small market = low priority.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Small market = low priority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JBadger</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/18/evilly-qa-3/#comment-250802</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JBadger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2015 22:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21458#comment-250802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fix gameplay why would we want that Woras? It&#039;s far better that they make the game &quot;look Pretty&quot; and fiddle while Rome burns.  

&quot;Working as intended&quot;, &quot;it will be done when it&#039;s done&quot; and every other BS line that Wargaming comes out with.
Specifically regarding their cash cow that is losing membership without replacing new members. WoWs will sink into oblivion as WoWp did. Poof gone. Followed by WOT

9.6 will bring us the &quot;Same problems that have plagued this game since 8.3&quot;  They keep having the same BS over and over.
Excuses are far easier than doing a proper job as was shown by the 9.4 debacle.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fix gameplay why would we want that Woras? It&#8217;s far better that they make the game &#8220;look Pretty&#8221; and fiddle while Rome burns.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Working as intended&#8221;, &#8220;it will be done when it&#8217;s done&#8221; and every other BS line that Wargaming comes out with.<br />
Specifically regarding their cash cow that is losing membership without replacing new members. WoWs will sink into oblivion as WoWp did. Poof gone. Followed by WOT</p>
<p>9.6 will bring us the &#8220;Same problems that have plagued this game since 8.3&#8243;  They keep having the same BS over and over.<br />
Excuses are far easier than doing a proper job as was shown by the 9.4 debacle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ExoNut</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/18/evilly-qa-3/#comment-250777</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ExoNut]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2015 20:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21458#comment-250777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From russian perspective it&#039;s the opposite you know.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From russian perspective it&#8217;s the opposite you know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Observer413</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/18/evilly-qa-3/#comment-250762</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Observer413]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2015 19:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21458#comment-250762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Germans = orcs and ussr=humans? Lolnope, its the other way around. If IS-series and KV-series of tanks aren&#039;t orcish or trollish with their armor, then i don&#039;t know what is. 
 
When i play Tiger2/E-75 i think of a paladin with a shield, not some greenskin]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Germans = orcs and ussr=humans? Lolnope, its the other way around. If IS-series and KV-series of tanks aren&#8217;t orcish or trollish with their armor, then i don&#8217;t know what is. </p>
<p>When i play Tiger2/E-75 i think of a paladin with a shield, not some greenskin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
