<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 9.6 Test HD Models</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/23/9-6-test-hd-models/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/23/9-6-test-hd-models/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RidingPonies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/23/9-6-test-hd-models/#comment-254570</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RidingPonies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2015 08:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21587#comment-254570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When will be is3 hd?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When will be is3 hd?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noobz</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/23/9-6-test-hd-models/#comment-254547</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[noobz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2015 04:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21587#comment-254547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[why is everyone complaining about the e100 turret having a smaller mantlet? its not like people missed the big flat spot before.and why would the e100 get the same turret as the maus? the one thing the maus has over the e100 and people think the e100 should get it? seems logical]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why is everyone complaining about the e100 turret having a smaller mantlet? its not like people missed the big flat spot before.and why would the e100 get the same turret as the maus? the one thing the maus has over the e100 and people think the e100 should get it? seems logical</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Legiondude</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/23/9-6-test-hd-models/#comment-254542</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legiondude]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2015 04:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21587#comment-254542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s under wraps until the actual patch that swaps them]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s under wraps until the actual patch that swaps them</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Summerz</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/23/9-6-test-hd-models/#comment-254540</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Summerz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2015 03:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21587#comment-254540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Better surviveability, dorky looks... meh : (]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better surviveability, dorky looks&#8230; meh : (</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slayer Jesse</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/23/9-6-test-hd-models/#comment-254528</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Slayer Jesse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2015 03:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21587#comment-254528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, probably a Tier 8 T95 without the tracks and the 120mm gun? Because I would be ok with that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, probably a Tier 8 T95 without the tracks and the 120mm gun? Because I would be ok with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InvaderNat</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/23/9-6-test-hd-models/#comment-254395</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[InvaderNat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 20:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21587#comment-254395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it just me or did the UFP of the Ferdinand get a little bit of extra slope to it? I certainly hope it did as my poor Ferdi has been suffering a bit from power-creep. Even a small increase can significantly increase it&#039;s durability e.g. Tiger II vs E 75 front hull.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me or did the UFP of the Ferdinand get a little bit of extra slope to it? I certainly hope it did as my poor Ferdi has been suffering a bit from power-creep. Even a small increase can significantly increase it&#8217;s durability e.g. Tiger II vs E 75 front hull.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SquareCanine</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/23/9-6-test-hd-models/#comment-254363</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SquareCanine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 20:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21587#comment-254363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chefitian covered this. T28 and T95 are the same vehicle. It got the second name (T95) when the army decided it was an SPG instead of a Super Heavy Tank.

The T28 in the game is an entirely separate (and fictional) vehicle. It&#039;s basically an imagining of what a prototype for the T28/T95 would have looked like. The easiest way to tell it&#039;s a fake (and not just a T95 with the outer tracks removed as some believe) is to look at the front. The T28 in game has drive wheels on the front, while the real vehicle has the drive wheels on the back and no armoured prow under the gun.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chefitian covered this. T28 and T95 are the same vehicle. It got the second name (T95) when the army decided it was an SPG instead of a Super Heavy Tank.</p>
<p>The T28 in the game is an entirely separate (and fictional) vehicle. It&#8217;s basically an imagining of what a prototype for the T28/T95 would have looked like. The easiest way to tell it&#8217;s a fake (and not just a T95 with the outer tracks removed as some believe) is to look at the front. The T28 in game has drive wheels on the front, while the real vehicle has the drive wheels on the back and no armoured prow under the gun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texshi Barrett</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/23/9-6-test-hd-models/#comment-254344</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Texshi Barrett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 20:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21587#comment-254344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They all look like they have unfinished skins]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They all look like they have unfinished skins</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oktobrvega</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/23/9-6-test-hd-models/#comment-254323</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[oktobrvega]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 19:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21587#comment-254323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I too am a army vet   1-12 Inf.  3rd Brigade 4 ID Ft. Carson CO.  11 years on M1A1.   And this is a comparo of models there Dan Rather, with top notch reporting of facts, not physics.

Watch who you insult.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too am a army vet   1-12 Inf.  3rd Brigade 4 ID Ft. Carson CO.  11 years on M1A1.   And this is a comparo of models there Dan Rather, with top notch reporting of facts, not physics.</p>
<p>Watch who you insult.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: __Finest__</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/23/9-6-test-hd-models/#comment-254300</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[__Finest__]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 18:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21587#comment-254300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah I saw a ELC eating a 268&#039;s shell? So? That means ELCs are able to engage 268s every time they fail platoon? Please...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I saw a ELC eating a 268&#8242;s shell? So? That means ELCs are able to engage 268s every time they fail platoon? Please&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
