Comments on: Wargaming As Usual, 0.9.6 Edition

By: Polemarchos

Polemarchos — Tue, 27 Jan 2015 15:15:18 +0000

SilentStalker,

Is it that the collision model of the turret cradle is just sunk a little too low into the hull? Or is the whole shape itself FUBAR?

By: Loken

Loken — Tue, 27 Jan 2015 10:29:56 +0000

It’s not like anything is gonna bounce from that paper tank either way.

By: Ruskraaz

Ruskraaz — Tue, 27 Jan 2015 09:03:20 +0000

Indeed a new low has been reached. I’ve never seen a more stupid comment.
It’s so stupid, I had to login and express it, which is ultimately pointless.

By: WaffulMann

WaffulMann — Tue, 27 Jan 2015 07:00:29 +0000

WG plis, we can spot you from a mile away

By: WaffulMann

WaffulMann — Tue, 27 Jan 2015 06:58:36 +0000

At least WT doesn’t claim to be what it’s not. If ads are true, WoT is the most accurate tank simulator on the market and has massive 30vs30 teams slugging it out on two sides of a valley with no cover.

By: loner85

loner85 — Tue, 27 Jan 2015 02:56:27 +0000

If you don’t like his blog, why are you even posting on it? Explain the logic behind that to me.

By: loner85

loner85 — Tue, 27 Jan 2015 02:55:11 +0000

And therefore, take this as a bug report directly to WG, so they can iron out this mistake.

By: ExoNut

ExoNut — Tue, 27 Jan 2015 01:15:13 +0000

It was a sarcasm….

By: TimberWolffe

TimberWolffe — Mon, 26 Jan 2015 23:19:14 +0000

“Best quality assurance in the industry”
okay but Warthunder doesn’t have consistent fuckups??? like their tanks are literally perfect on a collision basis. Besides, industry is a very loose term for something that has all of about 6 games in it

By: Baldrickk

Baldrickk — Mon, 26 Jan 2015 17:52:06 +0000

Ahem:

Why am I posting this – after all, it’s still 9.6 test, right? To catch the bugs and all that? Well, last time this happened, it went live with such a bug (again, the “flying turret”) and the results you probably know.