Comments on: “How to Get More FPS in WoT” Video

By: Dakota Ford

Dakota Ford — Fri, 30 Jan 2015 04:31:44 +0000

Ok, there’s a lot of argument over AMD vs Intel, While I get some of it, you guys fail to realize that AMD makes more “budget” CPUs while Intel pumps out CPUs intended for high end systems

Also, if I get better performance on a system running Windows Vista with a single core AMD Athlon 64 3200+ (2.2 Ghz) and 1.5 GB of RAM then I do with Windows 7 system on a dual core Pentium 4 (2.1 Ghz) and 4 GB of RAM, I think we know which manufacturer has better hardware.

My current laptop, running Windows 7 with an AMD APU E-300 (2 cores, 1.3 ghz) and 4 GB of RAM actually runs fairly better than the Intel laptop I had. Though the CPU does seem to bottleneck the GPU a bit. Funny because they’re on the same chip.

By: talon04

talon04 — Thu, 29 Jan 2015 20:50:25 +0000

I rarely get drops to 30 though. I have had issue with screen tearing because my monitor is crap though.

By: Tandem

Tandem — Thu, 29 Jan 2015 07:00:46 +0000

even if 60 fps for the human eye is an “arbitrary number”, most LCDs run at 60hz so anything higher won’t even show on your screen. It’s useless, it overheats the gpu, so it’s always better to set v-sync on, unless you want to do a benchmark or something.

By: Tandem

Tandem — Thu, 29 Jan 2015 06:57:01 +0000

your advice is very stupid
the overall game performance depends on multiple things, from GPU speed, GPU RAM size and speed, common RAM size & speed, the kind of drive you’re using (SSD or HDD or w/e), the background processes & services you’re running… and the list goes on (not mentioning the graphic stettings you have ingame and your internet connection). so it is NOT just the CPU….

By: Mana Wolvenworks

Mana Wolvenworks — Thu, 29 Jan 2015 04:38:35 +0000

Thnx SS this is quite helpful in explaining what certain bits of the settings will do =)

By: mybackhurts

mybackhurts — Thu, 29 Jan 2015 01:30:30 +0000

i will own your ass on my VIC 20 :)

By: daefix

daefix — Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:09:38 +0000

Losing the FPU per core doesn’t make a core a half-core.

I have a Fx8320 at 4,6ghz, lets compare performance wot vs modern games and you can easily see is a wot multi-core support problem.

By: daefix

daefix — Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:07:24 +0000

People complain because multi-core support is ridiculous on WOT, amd has lower IPC’s but you have weak intel procesors too what are suffering from framedrops, and even the new intel ones cant stay on 100fps even overclocked.

“- if the game runs on less than 60 FPS, it’s better not to enable V-sync and Tripple Buffering (in general graphics tab) at all, as both can cause performance loss”

Yeah, but what about the tearing? playing less than 60fps with intense tearing is bullshit.

By: Kinemglavi

Kinemglavi — Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:26:59 +0000

I’m running WOT on:

AMD FX8350 @ 4.4GHz
Radeon r9 270x
8gb RAM

The game runs on max details with 60 fps, only shadows are set to medium.

However i’m not using pretty much any addons except for xvm(player stats).

By: UnknownRex

UnknownRex — Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:26:46 +0000

WOT run perfectly on my box, more or less. My box is overspecced for WOT, but even at max settings I get 60 fps.

Then again I got dual 980′s, 32 Gb RAM and a six core 3.5 GHz i7.

WOT is also installed on my main SSD.