Comments on: Armored Warfare Pre-Alpha: First Impressions

By: askold-kr

askold-kr — Tue, 03 Feb 2015 10:15:12 +0000

We will see=).

By: abhirup27

abhirup27 — Tue, 03 Feb 2015 03:19:07 +0000

hahaha read the lines of conclusion – “will it be a WoT killer?
No, of course not. At this point World of Tanks is in the same position World of Warcraft is, the defining element of its genre.”-WOT fan.
i can see he is crying .
it will be a WOT killer .

By: YourNIGHTMare

YourNIGHTMare — Mon, 02 Feb 2015 17:34:23 +0000

…or they proved that their idea of “realism” is not really canon…

By: YourNIGHTMare

YourNIGHTMare — Mon, 02 Feb 2015 17:30:51 +0000

So the word “missile” is what, klingon, Woras?

By: Mana Wolvenworks

Mana Wolvenworks — Mon, 02 Feb 2015 04:51:19 +0000

last time i tried Crysis 2 on my old Fossil-spec Samsung laptop (17 inch and it’s an office laptop? wtf?!) it lagged so hard ragequits are mandatory. now with my ROG, who knows what’ll happen…

but since I can handle Firefall at high+bloom, I think it’ll work.

By: gloknar

gloknar — Mon, 02 Feb 2015 00:46:23 +0000

Hey SS, did they developed a screen to send bug reports to the developers after the battle?

By: SectR

SectR — Sun, 01 Feb 2015 16:52:33 +0000

Too much youtube for a certain somebody.

What you played is a finished product that is lacking final polish and stuff that “might” be added due to new ideas they might have on what to include.

You should have saved yourself the time to write the intro, because absolutely nobody other than the dev team or dev QA at most QA as a test to give some feedback, actually have access to anything that is earlier than a beta, which is what you played and experienced SS, the beta of AW, so raise your standards way more and lower your expectations for performance and everything you understimate or in other words, over estimate the words and apologies of the devs.

For future reference, there is no such thing as closed alpha or any other term and mediatic excuse, when somebody that isn’t an employee gets access to something, it’s already Beta at the very worst for the company, that applies even to early access games.

By: INamexI

INamexI — Sun, 01 Feb 2015 12:28:16 +0000

SS you forgot to mention how spotting system works in AW.

By: Vlad Pomar

Vlad Pomar — Sun, 01 Feb 2015 12:27:08 +0000

I never said that WoT doesn’t require skill to play. I have about 10k battles and about 56% win rate so I know it does.
The thing is in WoT skill means you know how to abuse the spotting system,or a cupola or range finder weak spot which you can shoot until you kill the enemy, or to circle a slow tank to death, etc…
If you would re-skin the tanks in WoT to unicorns you would have the exact same game.

In WT Sim battles a skillful player means that he knows how to change gears, how to shoot at long range with each shell and each gun, he knows how to stay in cover from bombers, the properties of each shell and the module placement of each tank, etc…

Long story short, in WT GF Sim the skills needed to succeed resemble the skills of a real tanker, in WoT a skillful player doesn’t have anything to do with tanks, he has to know how to abuse/use the game and tank models…

P.S. You can play WT planes without a joystick but its damn hard

By: AlmostLikeHuman

AlmostLikeHuman — Sun, 01 Feb 2015 11:39:20 +0000

This is maybe the worst chain of replies I’ve ever seen… It goes from dumbass console wars (I can’t belive people still do that) to racism and xenophobia in a few lines of text… Wow.