Comments on: “Yuri’s Hatch” – Landsverk L-60 http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/05/yuris-hatch-landsverk-l-60/ Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2 By: Evangelion242 http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/05/yuris-hatch-landsverk-l-60/#comment-260946 Fri, 06 Feb 2015 23:22:04 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21921#comment-260946 I agree!
The tank would be so unique (both in good and bad ways). For normal TD players this tank would need a new play-style.

Prons:
+Good camo
+Good elevation and depression (the whole tank would elevate making it better protected)
+Accuracy
+Rate of fire
+Same speed in forward as in reverse
+Only 3 crew members (and to knockout the driver would almost be impossible)
+Many troll and autobounces

Cons:
-Camonet and binoculars would be useless do to you have to move the tank all the time to aim it.
-Flat target from above making it easy for SPGs to kill.
-No high damage (average 390-440)
-The whole tank must move to aim for its target
-(if history accurate) wouldn’t be able to fire on the move
-If autoloader there will be no Gun-rammer
-Bad armor.

For the 103 enthusiast this tank would be awesome but otherwise this tank will be well balanced on its own in Tier X.

But I also hope for a full Swedish techtree: http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/24/swedish-tanks-special-branchtree-for-wot/

]]> By: Oberonium http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/05/yuris-hatch-landsverk-l-60/#comment-260544 Fri, 06 Feb 2015 13:21:54 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21921#comment-260544 -> How would you get that suspension to work in game…

It is possible, but still requires development of a special mechanism for it.

]]> By: sigurdblueface http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/05/yuris-hatch-landsverk-l-60/#comment-260435 Fri, 06 Feb 2015 08:55:14 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21921#comment-260435 “Probably, one of the best and most advanced tanks of 1930′s”

]]> By: Ezekial http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/05/yuris-hatch-landsverk-l-60/#comment-260424 Fri, 06 Feb 2015 06:25:20 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21921#comment-260424 I think that they should have the Strv 103 in game. Either that or the prototype which should fall in the development time constraints.
Tier 10 TD.
105mm with a caliber length of 62 vs 51 on the Centurion.
Penetration should be higher, as would accuracy, rate of fire for the auto loader would be tricky.
Bouncy hull, crew of three
How would you get that suspension to work in game…

]]> By: Lance Coolie http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/05/yuris-hatch-landsverk-l-60/#comment-260418 Fri, 06 Feb 2015 03:45:23 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21921#comment-260418 Still Better than the Challenger ;)

FTFY

]]> By: Westonbirt_EU http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/05/yuris-hatch-landsverk-l-60/#comment-260325 Thu, 05 Feb 2015 17:46:26 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21921#comment-260325 Yeah, he’s been a dick once or twice but he definitely has the chops of an armoured historian.

]]> By: Barbu http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/05/yuris-hatch-landsverk-l-60/#comment-260255 Thu, 05 Feb 2015 16:13:28 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21921#comment-260255 And the tank too ;)

]]> By: MEND http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/05/yuris-hatch-landsverk-l-60/#comment-260243 Thu, 05 Feb 2015 15:58:44 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21921#comment-260243 Maybe one of the many viewers of FTR could do a edited version of the video.

]]> By: PepperMill_na http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/05/yuris-hatch-landsverk-l-60/#comment-260227 Thu, 05 Feb 2015 15:44:13 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21921#comment-260227 Strv M/42 in the background! That would be an excellent WoT tank.

]]> By: yuripasholok http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/05/yuris-hatch-landsverk-l-60/#comment-260187 Thu, 05 Feb 2015 14:49:32 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21921#comment-260187 Nope.
I like videos of Chieftain. He use documents and manuals as a source for videos, and it’s very good. Good quality stuff. Also he was commander of Abrams and Bradley.

]]>