Comments on: 9.6 Accuracy Change Explained

By: tearan

tearan — Mon, 09 Feb 2015 11:31:25 +0000

it was done once, look at the dots. it was just scaled down to 9.6 – check dots on borders

By: Kamil Banul

Kamil Banul — Mon, 09 Feb 2015 10:44:23 +0000

The picture with KV-5 i WRONG actually. It’s just the same dots pattern enlarged. So it can be from 9.5 not form 9.6 aim system. In 9.6 as it was said there should be much less hits in te bulls eye on big circle. Another WG screw-up I think.

By: Blockypanzer

Blockypanzer — Sun, 08 Feb 2015 16:17:09 +0000

Sigh. Played the test server and carefully observed the accuracy changes on vehicles that rely on accuracy. Geared up my Leopard 1 and entered about 30 games over a few days. Instances like this became common: well aimed shot at 200m on a tracked T49 (think repair kit glitches they had) goes low and hits the tracks under the hull, 0 damage. I aim directly at his turret ring. Fire again, hits floor by his tank. Final shot once again fully aimed, hits his gun and does 0 damage. These shots were about 3/4 aimed as I was peeking a ridge to avoid a pair of 149s hitting me, but with the L7A3 gun, a top notch crew and all the add one possible, it was still missing. Wargaming have found before that blanket nerfs don’t work, and that they need to actually take care and suit the nerf to the problem. A slight nerf to some vehicles and a more serious one to others seems a better option, lets say a KV2 has a drastically lowered chance of hitting the centre of the circle, which diminishes to almost 0 while moving, whereas an M4 Sherman has a relatively good chance of a bullseye while stationary, better than most on the move but still not a reliable tactic, etc. tanks like the Centurion, Leopard, T62A, etc, high tiered medium tanks and the like, ought to keep their gun handling, because in tier ten matches if a medium driver cannot hit those weak spots on that Jpz E100, or now even reliably hit and pen something like an Object 268 without the shots going awry and smacking into mantles, tracks, or spaced armor, then people are going to load Gold ammo. They say this nerf is to help heavy tanks play properly. I guarantee this will not stop base camping IS7s because artillery is still too dangerous, and even with all the nerfs TDs still have a fear factor to them (as they should) that a lot of bad players haven’t overcome yet. This is just a poor decision on wargaming’s behalf. Shame on them

By: jerv

jerv — Sun, 08 Feb 2015 04:02:12 +0000

Cuz reeding iz harrd!!111

By: jerv

jerv — Sun, 08 Feb 2015 03:59:19 +0000

Which may lose a number of players.

If chat and the forums are any clue, many WoT players are here from CoD, and depriving them of the ability to do a 360-no-scope will cause much rage-uninstalling.

By: megapro

megapro — Sat, 07 Feb 2015 21:06:37 +0000

-.- This particular picture is not a comparision between 9.5 and 9.6 but between not aimed and fully aimed both in 9.6 hence the distribution is the same. How about reading before calling something BS…

By: World of Tanks - Die Sache mit der Genauigkeit mit Patch 9.6 - Himmelsdorf.de

World of Tanks - Die Sache mit der Genauigkeit mit Patch 9.6 - Himmelsdorf.de — Sat, 07 Feb 2015 17:04:53 +0000

[…] Quelle: World of Tanks – Russia | For the Record […]

By: WoT 9.6 Accuracy Change

WoT 9.6 Accuracy Change — Sat, 07 Feb 2015 16:51:48 +0000

[…] Pay attention, this post is only in italian language. If you want read it in english, follow this link: http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/06/9-6-accuracy-change-explained/ […]

By: cerberaspeed12

cerberaspeed12 — Sat, 07 Feb 2015 16:40:02 +0000

they r not Russian,they r Belorussian.

By: cerberaspeed12

cerberaspeed12 — Sat, 07 Feb 2015 16:39:12 +0000

again nerf for meds and lights,and buff for ht and td.so stupid to meet needs of majority,that even do not unterstand the point.i am sick of bunch of noobs playing only tds and hts.