<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Ranzar Video</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/06/new-ranzar-video-57/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/06/new-ranzar-video-57/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AkinaGG</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/06/new-ranzar-video-57/#comment-261068</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AkinaGG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2015 10:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21965#comment-261068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow....that&#039;s just what I thought the whiners causing less fun to the game now....

nerverthless in ASIA server seems arty is still usually more than 3 per side which pissed me off anyway....(IMO cap of 2 spg is reasonable.....3 will just able to secure all the World of corridors]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230;.that&#8217;s just what I thought the whiners causing less fun to the game now&#8230;.</p>
<p>nerverthless in ASIA server seems arty is still usually more than 3 per side which pissed me off anyway&#8230;.(IMO cap of 2 spg is reasonable&#8230;..3 will just able to secure all the World of corridors</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lapaaaa</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/06/new-ranzar-video-57/#comment-261067</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lapaaaa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2015 10:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21965#comment-261067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Could you name me those lightly armored T10 tanks that have under 1250hp?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you name me those lightly armored T10 tanks that have under 1250hp?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KafarPL</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/06/new-ranzar-video-57/#comment-261019</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KafarPL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2015 09:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21965#comment-261019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Give the T-54 a mild mobility + agility nerf. ( Acceleration / Hull traverse )&quot;

You want to nerf a tank that is already a bit sluggish ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Give the T-54 a mild mobility + agility nerf. ( Acceleration / Hull traverse )&#8221;</p>
<p>You want to nerf a tank that is already a bit sluggish ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slayer Jesse</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/06/new-ranzar-video-57/#comment-260999</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Slayer Jesse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2015 06:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21965#comment-260999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#REMOVE_TANKS_FROM_THE_GAME]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#REMOVE_TANKS_FROM_THE_GAME</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WARLOCK360100 .</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/06/new-ranzar-video-57/#comment-260994</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WARLOCK360100 .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2015 03:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21965#comment-260994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very true story]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very true story</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D8W2P4</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/06/new-ranzar-video-57/#comment-260964</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[D8W2P4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2015 01:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21965#comment-260964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because something that regularly does 1000+ damage from around T7 on up (get into T10 and you see 2000+ damage) with a massive splash radius (that on a &quot;boo-hoo I missed&quot; does as much if not more damage than the biggest baddest TDs on a direct hit) all while being able to do it from the opposite side of the map and sending it up and over most cover, totally isn&#039;t unbalanced and it&#039;s just people &quot;whining&quot;.

&gt;Inb4 &quot;b-bu-but it&#039;s a 200+mm shell what did you expect it to do :^)&quot; shitposts.
You&#039;ve just outlined the major issue here, they shouldn&#039;t have put cannons over 155mm in the game period, it&#039;s a balancing nightmare that ends up pissing off people on both ends of the gun.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because something that regularly does 1000+ damage from around T7 on up (get into T10 and you see 2000+ damage) with a massive splash radius (that on a &#8220;boo-hoo I missed&#8221; does as much if not more damage than the biggest baddest TDs on a direct hit) all while being able to do it from the opposite side of the map and sending it up and over most cover, totally isn&#8217;t unbalanced and it&#8217;s just people &#8220;whining&#8221;.</p>
<p>&gt;Inb4 &#8220;b-bu-but it&#8217;s a 200+mm shell what did you expect it to do :^)&#8221; shitposts.<br />
You&#8217;ve just outlined the major issue here, they shouldn&#8217;t have put cannons over 155mm in the game period, it&#8217;s a balancing nightmare that ends up pissing off people on both ends of the gun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cb99</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/06/new-ranzar-video-57/#comment-260963</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cb99]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2015 01:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21965#comment-260963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just so spot on, best video yet.

-cb99]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just so spot on, best video yet.</p>
<p>-cb99</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nadeah</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/06/new-ranzar-video-57/#comment-260947</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nadeah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2015 23:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21965#comment-260947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[T-54 gold ammo deserves nerfs.
Actually it generally deserves rebalancing.

Give the T-54 historical 100mm thick frontal plate.
Give the 100mm gun less awful penetration (218+ ) but worse handling. 
( but not as terrible as the D-54 gun )
Give the 100mm lower DPM.
Give the 100mm worse Gold ammo or something like HESH + Gold ammo price increase.
Give the T-54 a mild mobility + agility nerf. ( Acceleration / Hull traverse )
Give the T-54 a higher Repair bill
Give the T-54 less retardedly expensive ammo. 

Tada, a balanced tank which has a good turret while not being exploitable by using HEAT to compensate for it&#039;s only major downside. ( Penetration ) ( Other than gun depression )]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T-54 gold ammo deserves nerfs.<br />
Actually it generally deserves rebalancing.</p>
<p>Give the T-54 historical 100mm thick frontal plate.<br />
Give the 100mm gun less awful penetration (218+ ) but worse handling.<br />
( but not as terrible as the D-54 gun )<br />
Give the 100mm lower DPM.<br />
Give the 100mm worse Gold ammo or something like HESH + Gold ammo price increase.<br />
Give the T-54 a mild mobility + agility nerf. ( Acceleration / Hull traverse )<br />
Give the T-54 a higher Repair bill<br />
Give the T-54 less retardedly expensive ammo. </p>
<p>Tada, a balanced tank which has a good turret while not being exploitable by using HEAT to compensate for it&#8217;s only major downside. ( Penetration ) ( Other than gun depression )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nadeah</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/06/new-ranzar-video-57/#comment-260945</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nadeah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2015 23:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21965#comment-260945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tier 10 turreted batchat arty has 4 shots that can all one shot lightly armoured tier 10 tanks. It has a good aimtime as well and is just as likely to track you as other arties when it hits. 

The downside is terrible splash, &#039;&#039;low&#039;&#039; damage per shell on non-penetration (But if all 4 hit the best burst damage out of all arty) ,  only slightly better shell-arc than 261 and taking forever to load the first clip. ( battle can be over before it actually get&#039;s good shots off ) 

The batchat arty can be just as annoying as &#039;&#039;bert&#039;&#039; when played competently. It&#039;s bloody hard to catch in anything other than a batchat too due to nice mobility. ( and since it has a turret it can point it&#039;s hull toward escape routes during magazine reload, unlike the sluggish turning 261 with terrible gun-arc ) 

but neither the 261 nor BC 155 58 is overpowered, CGC is the closest thing to overpowered and arty are a broken mechanic. Trust me when I say that they generally don&#039;t hit many shells and have a good chance of not even doing splash damage WHILE FULLY AIMED.

Most arty would take it as a blessing if they could get lower but more consistent damage on people who simply camp in one spot forever without moving.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tier 10 turreted batchat arty has 4 shots that can all one shot lightly armoured tier 10 tanks. It has a good aimtime as well and is just as likely to track you as other arties when it hits. </p>
<p>The downside is terrible splash, &#8221;low&#8221; damage per shell on non-penetration (But if all 4 hit the best burst damage out of all arty) ,  only slightly better shell-arc than 261 and taking forever to load the first clip. ( battle can be over before it actually get&#8217;s good shots off ) </p>
<p>The batchat arty can be just as annoying as &#8221;bert&#8221; when played competently. It&#8217;s bloody hard to catch in anything other than a batchat too due to nice mobility. ( and since it has a turret it can point it&#8217;s hull toward escape routes during magazine reload, unlike the sluggish turning 261 with terrible gun-arc ) </p>
<p>but neither the 261 nor BC 155 58 is overpowered, CGC is the closest thing to overpowered and arty are a broken mechanic. Trust me when I say that they generally don&#8217;t hit many shells and have a good chance of not even doing splash damage WHILE FULLY AIMED.</p>
<p>Most arty would take it as a blessing if they could get lower but more consistent damage on people who simply camp in one spot forever without moving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apolloF117 .</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/06/new-ranzar-video-57/#comment-260924</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[apolloF117 .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2015 22:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21965#comment-260924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[lets see, delte t10 meds again, lets nerf t54 gold ammo,]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lets see, delte t10 meds again, lets nerf t54 gold ammo,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
