Comments on: 13.2.2015

By: mistermex1

mistermex1 — Sat, 14 Feb 2015 15:40:20 +0000

Hmm, if the shell pen the track it whould continue to go into the hull and make dmg, if the shell has enough pen. No wonder track dmg is so inconsistent.

By: eXterminuss

eXterminuss — Sat, 14 Feb 2015 15:12:53 +0000

don’t forget that limited MM tanks might be problematic for Matchmaker.
mfg eX

By: Crucis

Crucis — Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:59:03 +0000

With arty, without arty, I like Prokhorovka/FS. Prefer FS for the environment though. I enjoy the near total lack of unusable terrain.

By: Snyrren

Snyrren — Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:41:43 +0000

Braaaiiiins… Om-nom-nom…

By: danymsk

danymsk — Sat, 14 Feb 2015 10:06:25 +0000

Nah, not exactly assholes, limited matchmaking tanks really is a problem for developers, for example the IS-6 is really good against most tier 8/9 tanks due too its great armor, but due too the lack of penetration it won’t stand tier 10 tanks.
This means everytime they bring out new tier 8/9 tanks that DO meet tier 10s, they have to balance it both against all the limited MM tanks and against tier 10 tanks, that really is a pain in the ass, since they shouldn’t get owned by the premiums, but shouldn’t be too overpowered against higher tier tanks.
I personally would think it’s both a smart and good move if they slowly remove all limited MM tanks from the gift shop, it would mean that several tanks that are just bad against the is-6 due to its good armor, will get better games, and offcourse, if I was a guy at wargaming I would totally have done the same they did with the e-25

By: ZombieFX

ZombieFX — Sat, 14 Feb 2015 09:38:31 +0000

Good idea. so ppl that payed 100-200 $ for a AUS_J now threw its money on nothing.

Scarring off paying gamers… hmmm wg sure will fix that in 9.7 :)

By: ZombieFX

ZombieFX — Sat, 14 Feb 2015 09:35:16 +0000

Does it matter in any way shape or form for the game ?
I said its faster – but USELESS speed…

great now you wait for the counter to start… WHAT A BENEFIT :D

And that for i payed 2x the money for 1/2 of the space… (which adds to 4x cost per GB)

By: Dexter5021

Dexter5021 — Sat, 14 Feb 2015 06:39:41 +0000

As an arty player, i prefer the “frequent low damage” over the “rare one shot” model. I rather have a bunch of low damage shots, than oneshot a tank then miss all other shots. Before 8.6, artys where “frequent low damage” model, and it was FUN (played Priest and SU-8 a lot before 8.6) The current “rare one shot” model, or better call it “you barely would hit anything” is NOT fun. Not for arty players, and not for arty targets either. The only arty after 8.6 that is close to the “frequent low damage” model is the leFH18B2, but only in tier 7 battles, in tier 5 battles it becomes too OP against tier 3 tanks. I can’t understand why WG did not do anything with arty since 8.6, they don’t playing their own game???

By: RagnarokBazil

RagnarokBazil — Sat, 14 Feb 2015 02:39:53 +0000

i say buff the he shells so everyone has a chance to kill the op seal clubbers! ^^

By: Dead_Zombie

Dead_Zombie — Sat, 14 Feb 2015 02:09:52 +0000

or better yet:

- it’s possible that all the limited MM premiums will be removed from the premium shop and ingame store: “Anything can happen. But I won’t confirm anything.”

here we go again, trick the community into buying more premium tanks..what a bunch of assholes WG and storm are.