<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 16.2.2015</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/16/16-2-2015/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/16/16-2-2015/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 23r0_NA</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/16/16-2-2015/#comment-266058</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[23r0_NA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 05:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=22194#comment-266058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;International Tech Tree&quot; is the term you&#039;re looking for.  The minor European nations are going to get a &quot;Euro Tech Tree&quot; of their own (starting with the Italians and I THINK the Swedes, and maybe the Czechs immediately after)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;International Tech Tree&#8221; is the term you&#8217;re looking for.  The minor European nations are going to get a &#8220;Euro Tech Tree&#8221; of their own (starting with the Italians and I THINK the Swedes, and maybe the Czechs immediately after)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ewanc9</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/16/16-2-2015/#comment-266048</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ewanc9]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 02:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=22194#comment-266048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yes the deaths of innocents is now entirely justified, piss off.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes the deaths of innocents is now entirely justified, piss off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gundamhisoka</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/16/16-2-2015/#comment-265946</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gundamhisoka]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 18:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=22194#comment-265946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[tomato is strong with this one]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tomato is strong with this one</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClassicFrog (EU)</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/16/16-2-2015/#comment-265939</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ClassicFrog (EU)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 18:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=22194#comment-265939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Again, you&#039;ve only got as far as web-browser on my scale of account investigation, I&#039;m afraid.

I got to French arty via amx-12. And I only had to free-exp-jump over the boring bishop, that I got to via valentine, in order to get to 304.

You really need to take a better look at the tech tree and some other possibilities for certain things to happen. :)

But indeed, lefh is nice arty, so long you don&#039;t need to get anywhere fast. And yes, I would allow WG to take it away from me without a compensation just as well, as long as the arty as a class is gone entirely.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, you&#8217;ve only got as far as web-browser on my scale of account investigation, I&#8217;m afraid.</p>
<p>I got to French arty via amx-12. And I only had to free-exp-jump over the boring bishop, that I got to via valentine, in order to get to 304.</p>
<p>You really need to take a better look at the tech tree and some other possibilities for certain things to happen. :)</p>
<p>But indeed, lefh is nice arty, so long you don&#8217;t need to get anywhere fast. And yes, I would allow WG to take it away from me without a compensation just as well, as long as the arty as a class is gone entirely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClassicFrog (EU)</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/16/16-2-2015/#comment-265931</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ClassicFrog (EU)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 18:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=22194#comment-265931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are. 

See? It works both ways. Now go read about it instead of web-mything me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are. </p>
<p>See? It works both ways. Now go read about it instead of web-mything me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nadeah</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/16/16-2-2015/#comment-265879</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nadeah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 17:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=22194#comment-265879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m slightly above average, not good at all but I am just saying how Unicrums play these tanks usually, literally nothing smart about it if you don&#039;t see this yourself you must be rather low yourself. I have never flanked successfully in a batchat myself (neither alone nor in a 2 man platoon, but I only played it on the testserver, so  )  but I know it can be done. I have taken pop shots over ridges or hulldown spots with the E50M, Object 140 and STB-1 and that does make them work fantastically  but that still is single shot tanks with workable turrets 101, not anything particularly intelligent unlike what you seem to think.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m slightly above average, not good at all but I am just saying how Unicrums play these tanks usually, literally nothing smart about it if you don&#8217;t see this yourself you must be rather low yourself. I have never flanked successfully in a batchat myself (neither alone nor in a 2 man platoon, but I only played it on the testserver, so  )  but I know it can be done. I have taken pop shots over ridges or hulldown spots with the E50M, Object 140 and STB-1 and that does make them work fantastically  but that still is single shot tanks with workable turrets 101, not anything particularly intelligent unlike what you seem to think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nadeah</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/16/16-2-2015/#comment-265874</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nadeah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 17:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=22194#comment-265874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You take pop-shots with it, though. Just like the object 140, STB-1 and Object 430 you cannot expose your turret long enough for them to shoot at the weakest points. Which means the top half of the Objects and the flat parts next to the giant mantlet on the E50M. There is only one tank that can basically &#039;&#039;yolo&#039;&#039; hulldown and that is the T62A and only from a decent distance since it does have weak copula&#039;s.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You take pop-shots with it, though. Just like the object 140, STB-1 and Object 430 you cannot expose your turret long enough for them to shoot at the weakest points. Which means the top half of the Objects and the flat parts next to the giant mantlet on the E50M. There is only one tank that can basically &#8221;yolo&#8221; hulldown and that is the T62A and only from a decent distance since it does have weak copula&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mistermex1</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/16/16-2-2015/#comment-265804</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mistermex1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 15:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=22194#comment-265804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I dont want israel tanks in WOT because that would bring alot of zionist players in WOT and we dont want that. We have enough patriotic sick people playing as it is. Also it would be hard for me not to TK a tank with a israel flag...

Sorry no offense,]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont want israel tanks in WOT because that would bring alot of zionist players in WOT and we dont want that. We have enough patriotic sick people playing as it is. Also it would be hard for me not to TK a tank with a israel flag&#8230;</p>
<p>Sorry no offense,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spomenik</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/16/16-2-2015/#comment-265800</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spomenik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 15:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=22194#comment-265800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- Israeli Merkava Mk.I will most likely not appear in WoT, the problem does not seem to be the gun, but the fact that there’s no tree to put it in

Well they could make something like tech tree for nations that dont have enough vehicles for 1-10 tiers (cant think of any name for tree atm) , nations that have good tanks that could be implemented in wot but they are not coz of lack of other tiers

Like tier 1-3 from one nation,tier 4 from other, tier 5 from someone else that have suitable tier 5 and so on

I would not have anything against it and i think many would like to see some of their nation tanks in game that otherwise wont be posible]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- Israeli Merkava Mk.I will most likely not appear in WoT, the problem does not seem to be the gun, but the fact that there’s no tree to put it in</p>
<p>Well they could make something like tech tree for nations that dont have enough vehicles for 1-10 tiers (cant think of any name for tree atm) , nations that have good tanks that could be implemented in wot but they are not coz of lack of other tiers</p>
<p>Like tier 1-3 from one nation,tier 4 from other, tier 5 from someone else that have suitable tier 5 and so on</p>
<p>I would not have anything against it and i think many would like to see some of their nation tanks in game that otherwise wont be posible</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sahsnot</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/16/16-2-2015/#comment-265792</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sahsnot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 15:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=22194#comment-265792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[• comparing bodycounts: 
• declaring unwanted behaviour a genetic trait
• declaring your own point of view to the one of the people ...

... that&#039;s neither good argumentation nor does it put you in a good neighbourship. Just saying - I don&#039;t discuss further as SS will cancel it anyway.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>• comparing bodycounts:<br />
• declaring unwanted behaviour a genetic trait<br />
• declaring your own point of view to the one of the people &#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230; that&#8217;s neither good argumentation nor does it put you in a good neighbourship. Just saying &#8211; I don&#8217;t discuss further as SS will cancel it anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
