<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 23.2.2015</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/23/23-2-2015/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/23/23-2-2015/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JBadger</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/23/23-2-2015/#comment-268596</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JBadger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 20:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=22337#comment-268596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[it’s possible that the frontal hull armor of the Super Pershing is currently incorrect and will be changed (buffed, better angle) when the model is reworked to HD (possibly in 9.7)

LOL! way to go wargaming . You bought back many SP&#039;s, you paid out Gold to everybody who had the vehicle previously after you armor nerfed the crap out of it by changing the armor angle on the front end.  

You called it a Major historical re-balancing of the armor at the time. Making it more inline with what the pershing had. 

LOL now you say it&#039;s incorrect and will be buffed better angled.   What a bunch of complete idiots.  My guess you&#039;ll return it to pre nerf characteristics.  Did you not have someone physically measure the angle.  Or did they just eyeball it off 2d photos..

WG your developers are a complete and total FU*KING JOKE.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it’s possible that the frontal hull armor of the Super Pershing is currently incorrect and will be changed (buffed, better angle) when the model is reworked to HD (possibly in 9.7)</p>
<p>LOL! way to go wargaming . You bought back many SP&#8217;s, you paid out Gold to everybody who had the vehicle previously after you armor nerfed the crap out of it by changing the armor angle on the front end.  </p>
<p>You called it a Major historical re-balancing of the armor at the time. Making it more inline with what the pershing had. </p>
<p>LOL now you say it&#8217;s incorrect and will be buffed better angled.   What a bunch of complete idiots.  My guess you&#8217;ll return it to pre nerf characteristics.  Did you not have someone physically measure the angle.  Or did they just eyeball it off 2d photos..</p>
<p>WG your developers are a complete and total FU*KING JOKE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LegioCI</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/23/23-2-2015/#comment-268545</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LegioCI]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 18:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=22337#comment-268545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The T-44 is quick enough to flex around the map and find opportunities for side-shots or isolated enemy tanks to CoD. The T26E4 is not much faster than most heavy tanks of its Tier (and actually significantly slower than quite a few of them!) so its forced into one of two types of games- its either attempting to push a corridor with heavy tanks, in which its armor is generally insufficient (Even with significant juking, most Tier 8 HT guns can easily penetrate the SP&#039;s upper glacis weakpoint.) or into a supporting fire role in which is gun is generally insufficient.

However, performance is not the impetus for this change- WGs line for the past year has been that the Super Pershing is fine and that it will not be buff. (Whether there is any truth to that line is irrelevant- that was their story and they stuck to it.) The reason for this buff is that they&#039;ve gotten a hold of some new photographic evidence that pretty solidly proves that they got the armor layout wrong, that it should be better angled and that the secondary spaced armor plate should cover the entire UFG.

Honestly though, isn&#039;t anyone refreshed that for once a tank&#039;s armor isn&#039;t being nerfed by an HD rework?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The T-44 is quick enough to flex around the map and find opportunities for side-shots or isolated enemy tanks to CoD. The T26E4 is not much faster than most heavy tanks of its Tier (and actually significantly slower than quite a few of them!) so its forced into one of two types of games- its either attempting to push a corridor with heavy tanks, in which its armor is generally insufficient (Even with significant juking, most Tier 8 HT guns can easily penetrate the SP&#8217;s upper glacis weakpoint.) or into a supporting fire role in which is gun is generally insufficient.</p>
<p>However, performance is not the impetus for this change- WGs line for the past year has been that the Super Pershing is fine and that it will not be buff. (Whether there is any truth to that line is irrelevant- that was their story and they stuck to it.) The reason for this buff is that they&#8217;ve gotten a hold of some new photographic evidence that pretty solidly proves that they got the armor layout wrong, that it should be better angled and that the secondary spaced armor plate should cover the entire UFG.</p>
<p>Honestly though, isn&#8217;t anyone refreshed that for once a tank&#8217;s armor isn&#8217;t being nerfed by an HD rework?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KafarPL</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/23/23-2-2015/#comment-268189</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KafarPL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=22337#comment-268189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My comment above is not related at all to the SP, no idea what you are talking about]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My comment above is not related at all to the SP, no idea what you are talking about</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KafarPL</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/23/23-2-2015/#comment-268188</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KafarPL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=22337#comment-268188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Point ?

KT also laughs when it sees any other T8 MT. Most of the T8 heavies laugh at them. SP is no different in that matter than T-44 or Panther 2]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Point ?</p>
<p>KT also laughs when it sees any other T8 MT. Most of the T8 heavies laugh at them. SP is no different in that matter than T-44 or Panther 2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Afrika_Korps</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/23/23-2-2015/#comment-268170</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Afrika_Korps]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 09:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=22337#comment-268170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Try it out on the test server please before forming your &quot;expert&quot; advice....

And learn spellings while you&#039;re at it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try it out on the test server please before forming your &#8220;expert&#8221; advice&#8230;.</p>
<p>And learn spellings while you&#8217;re at it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Afrika_Korps</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/23/23-2-2015/#comment-268167</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Afrika_Korps]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 09:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=22337#comment-268167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;dont fuck with bosnian muslims kid&quot;

Yup definitely a retard......]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;dont fuck with bosnian muslims kid&#8221;</p>
<p>Yup definitely a retard&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Afrika_Korps</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/23/23-2-2015/#comment-268166</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Afrika_Korps]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 09:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=22337#comment-268166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can&#039;t say about panthers but if IS-3s couldn&#039;t stop them then it is the fault of those players. The gun on IS-3 can easily pen the upper half of the UFP of the SP.

And BTW, SP can&#039;t pen the IS-3 frontally, even the LFP is difficult to penetrate.

The only way I deal with them is by loading gold till I get a chance to shoot at the sides of the IS-3.

That explains your unstoppable trio of SPs.

And I have 54% WR in my SP (1350+ games) and it used to be 59% pre-nerf.

The armor on that tank is as good as the player facing it. A good player will go through it every time and noobs keep shooting the spaced armor without taking into account the pen on their guns. Against such players, SP is OP.

I face them in my KT (I play with 88 for more DPM) and killing those things is no problem at all. Even my T29 laughs when it sees a SP.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t say about panthers but if IS-3s couldn&#8217;t stop them then it is the fault of those players. The gun on IS-3 can easily pen the upper half of the UFP of the SP.</p>
<p>And BTW, SP can&#8217;t pen the IS-3 frontally, even the LFP is difficult to penetrate.</p>
<p>The only way I deal with them is by loading gold till I get a chance to shoot at the sides of the IS-3.</p>
<p>That explains your unstoppable trio of SPs.</p>
<p>And I have 54% WR in my SP (1350+ games) and it used to be 59% pre-nerf.</p>
<p>The armor on that tank is as good as the player facing it. A good player will go through it every time and noobs keep shooting the spaced armor without taking into account the pen on their guns. Against such players, SP is OP.</p>
<p>I face them in my KT (I play with 88 for more DPM) and killing those things is no problem at all. Even my T29 laughs when it sees a SP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhobosX</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/23/23-2-2015/#comment-268154</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PhobosX]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 08:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=22337#comment-268154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;- in 9.6 accuracy nerf, changes to damage done are proportional to the accuracy of the gun (the less accurate the gun is, the bigger the drop in damage done)&quot;

Try to shoot someting with obj 268 and other tier 10 big gun td - fcn amazing things is going on now. Yesterday I shoot into bulldog with jpe100 (AP round 300 pene) from 40m and I only detrack him. Hit something with 268 is fcn miracle now.

This game now start to be even more annoying then before.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;- in 9.6 accuracy nerf, changes to damage done are proportional to the accuracy of the gun (the less accurate the gun is, the bigger the drop in damage done)&#8221;</p>
<p>Try to shoot someting with obj 268 and other tier 10 big gun td &#8211; fcn amazing things is going on now. Yesterday I shoot into bulldog with jpe100 (AP round 300 pene) from 40m and I only detrack him. Hit something with 268 is fcn miracle now.</p>
<p>This game now start to be even more annoying then before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KafarPL</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/23/23-2-2015/#comment-268147</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KafarPL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 08:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=22337#comment-268147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Show me where I said that I want to get it nerfed. I didnt. I just said that its armor is already very sturdy on the t8. Angle it a bit and even UFP bounces stuff. As for the pen - T-44 says hi]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Show me where I said that I want to get it nerfed. I didnt. I just said that its armor is already very sturdy on the t8. Angle it a bit and even UFP bounces stuff. As for the pen &#8211; T-44 says hi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KafarPL</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/23/23-2-2015/#comment-268146</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KafarPL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 07:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=22337#comment-268146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[-Turn of the internet
-L2 read
-L2 use your brain
-Go back

If it wont help then go back to primary school

Got nothing else to say to sm1 like you]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>-Turn of the internet<br />
-L2 read<br />
-L2 use your brain<br />
-Go back</p>
<p>If it wont help then go back to primary school</p>
<p>Got nothing else to say to sm1 like you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
