<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why can&#8217;t we have full Tier 2-10 French HT line?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2016/06/26/why-cant-we-have-full-tier-2-10-french-ht-line/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2016/06/26/why-cant-we-have-full-tier-2-10-french-ht-line/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ndiver</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2016/06/26/why-cant-we-have-full-tier-2-10-french-ht-line/#comment-273168</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ndiver]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2016 09:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=22730#comment-273168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[See the info recovered by Teckyota in the branch he called &quot; les Chars lourds de contact&quot; composed partly of superheavy tanks : http://forum.worldoftanks.eu/index.php?/topic/316995-larbre-francais/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See the info recovered by Teckyota in the branch he called &#8221; les Chars lourds de contact&#8221; composed partly of superheavy tanks : <a href="http://forum.worldoftanks.eu/index.php?/topic/316995-larbre-francais/" rel="nofollow">http://forum.worldoftanks.eu/index.php?/topic/316995-larbre-francais/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Алексей Озеров</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2016/06/26/why-cant-we-have-full-tier-2-10-french-ht-line/#comment-273147</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Алексей Озеров]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2016 08:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=22730#comment-273147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TOG II is one  of the best tank for midlevel clan wars fo resources. And is really dangerous  beast in random near 60% of victories on 200 battles in my not so straight hands. 
 But - I have already 50-100 and 7 level already sold - so I miss this branch at all - I simply didnt want  play 200 more battles on it without skilled crew. And I&#039;m already stuck on 13-90 with new medium.
 But whole new branch from 2 level allow to train crew at least at first perk. So I&#039;m sure, that cropped branch without autoloaders will not be much popular.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TOG II is one  of the best tank for midlevel clan wars fo resources. And is really dangerous  beast in random near 60% of victories on 200 battles in my not so straight hands.<br />
 But &#8211; I have already 50-100 and 7 level already sold &#8211; so I miss this branch at all &#8211; I simply didnt want  play 200 more battles on it without skilled crew. And I&#8217;m already stuck on 13-90 with new medium.<br />
 But whole new branch from 2 level allow to train crew at least at first perk. So I&#8217;m sure, that cropped branch without autoloaders will not be much popular.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franz Hammermann</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2016/06/26/why-cant-we-have-full-tier-2-10-french-ht-line/#comment-273146</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Franz Hammermann]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2016 07:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=22730#comment-273146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Indeed, those tanks do have actually great armor for their tier :)

SS is back!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, those tanks do have actually great armor for their tier :)</p>
<p>SS is back!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anod Gaming</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2016/06/26/why-cant-we-have-full-tier-2-10-french-ht-line/#comment-273145</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anod Gaming]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2016 02:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=22730#comment-273145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[heavy French tanks, poor armor ??? serious??? really???
you made at least a minimum searched heavy tanks French before saying that ???,

the FCM1A, the FCM-2C, the char d&#039;arret (STCC), B1 and B40 ter,

regarding other heavy prewar French tanks had most had at least one armor approaching 100 mm, see at least 100 mm minimum armor
for better armored, and there are nearly 10 heavy tanks like this,
they are possible only in third 5-6, 7 for the best of them,
and 100 mm of armor in tier V-VI is strong, even very strong,
without being almost invincible as can be the Japanese O-I

les chars lourd français, une armure médiocre??? sérieux??? vraiment???
vous avez fait au moins un minimum cherché sur les chars lourds français avant de dire cela???, 

les FCM1A, le FCM-2c, le char d&#039;arret (STCC), B1 ter et B40, 

pour ce qui est des autres chars lourds français d&#039;avant guerre la plupart avait avaient au moins une armure avoisinant les 100 mm, voir au moins 100 mm d&#039;armure minimum
pour les mieux blindés, et il y a pres de 10 chars lourds comme cela,
ils ne sont possibles que dans les tiers 5-6, 7 pour le meilleur d&#039;entre eux,
et 100 mm d&#039;armure en tier V-VI, c&#039;est solide, très solide meme, 
sans pour autant être quasi-invincible comme peut l&#039;être le O-I japonais]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heavy French tanks, poor armor ??? serious??? really???<br />
you made at least a minimum searched heavy tanks French before saying that ???,</p>
<p>the FCM1A, the FCM-2C, the char d&#8217;arret (STCC), B1 and B40 ter,</p>
<p>regarding other heavy prewar French tanks had most had at least one armor approaching 100 mm, see at least 100 mm minimum armor<br />
for better armored, and there are nearly 10 heavy tanks like this,<br />
they are possible only in third 5-6, 7 for the best of them,<br />
and 100 mm of armor in tier V-VI is strong, even very strong,<br />
without being almost invincible as can be the Japanese O-I</p>
<p>les chars lourd français, une armure médiocre??? sérieux??? vraiment???<br />
vous avez fait au moins un minimum cherché sur les chars lourds français avant de dire cela???, </p>
<p>les FCM1A, le FCM-2c, le char d&#8217;arret (STCC), B1 ter et B40, </p>
<p>pour ce qui est des autres chars lourds français d&#8217;avant guerre la plupart avait avaient au moins une armure avoisinant les 100 mm, voir au moins 100 mm d&#8217;armure minimum<br />
pour les mieux blindés, et il y a pres de 10 chars lourds comme cela,<br />
ils ne sont possibles que dans les tiers 5-6, 7 pour le meilleur d&#8217;entre eux,<br />
et 100 mm d&#8217;armure en tier V-VI, c&#8217;est solide, très solide meme,<br />
sans pour autant être quasi-invincible comme peut l&#8217;être le O-I japonais</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: straswa .</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2016/06/26/why-cant-we-have-full-tier-2-10-french-ht-line/#comment-273140</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[straswa .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 15:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=22730#comment-273140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well I&#039;m still hoping for the Char 2C and FCM F1 in some form someday. I&#039;d buy them, even if they were premiums.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I&#8217;m still hoping for the Char 2C and FCM F1 in some form someday. I&#8217;d buy them, even if they were premiums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jak je to s novou francouzskou větví?</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2016/06/26/why-cant-we-have-full-tier-2-10-french-ht-line/#comment-273139</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jak je to s novou francouzskou větví?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 10:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=22730#comment-273139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Zdroj: rykoszet.info FTR [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Zdroj: rykoszet.info FTR [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Infernal969</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2016/06/26/why-cant-we-have-full-tier-2-10-french-ht-line/#comment-273138</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Infernal969]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 03:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=22730#comment-273138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I dunno if you&#039;ve used your brain while reading my post, but I was pointing out that the balancing department could for once do their goddamn job. We&#039;ve been waiting how many years for those tanks to come? Enough to lose any hope. We can wait some more for a complete line.
And if someone doesn&#039;t want to go through &quot;the TOGs&quot; to get to the top tiers, it&#039;s not like this game doesn&#039;t allow to make links between different lines. Make them researchable from one of the current heavies and the problem is solved.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno if you&#8217;ve used your brain while reading my post, but I was pointing out that the balancing department could for once do their goddamn job. We&#8217;ve been waiting how many years for those tanks to come? Enough to lose any hope. We can wait some more for a complete line.<br />
And if someone doesn&#8217;t want to go through &#8220;the TOGs&#8221; to get to the top tiers, it&#8217;s not like this game doesn&#8217;t allow to make links between different lines. Make them researchable from one of the current heavies and the problem is solved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inilitus .</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2016/06/26/why-cant-we-have-full-tier-2-10-french-ht-line/#comment-273137</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Inilitus .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=22730#comment-273137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s another factor that you have to see with the French superheavies, their historical appeal.  Many people would like to see these tanks compared to more random Russian prototypes, if WG treated the French like they did the Russians we would probably be having a sale on the R35 with FCM turret today.  These tanks are actually unique compared to most of the tanks that they&#039;re adding currently, and they actually fit into the WWI/WWII theme of the game.  There are lots of people who have heard of the Char 2C and FCM F1 and would love to see them in game.  Even if they sucked, I would still play them just to see them in game]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s another factor that you have to see with the French superheavies, their historical appeal.  Many people would like to see these tanks compared to more random Russian prototypes, if WG treated the French like they did the Russians we would probably be having a sale on the R35 with FCM turret today.  These tanks are actually unique compared to most of the tanks that they&#8217;re adding currently, and they actually fit into the WWI/WWII theme of the game.  There are lots of people who have heard of the Char 2C and FCM F1 and would love to see them in game.  Even if they sucked, I would still play them just to see them in game</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inilitus .</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2016/06/26/why-cant-we-have-full-tier-2-10-french-ht-line/#comment-273136</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Inilitus .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=22730#comment-273136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The FCM 1A actually had a top speed of 10/12 km/h]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The FCM 1A actually had a top speed of 10/12 km/h</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: armando30</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2016/06/26/why-cant-we-have-full-tier-2-10-french-ht-line/#comment-273135</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[armando30]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2016 21:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=22730#comment-273135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#Barbu   you know that in the first post when he announced the return of FTR he said this wouldn&#039;t be dedicated to WoT (for obvious reasons to someone who has followed his blog for at least 2 or 3 years) but purely historical

P.S: something is wrong with your head
&quot;quotes from cuddly developers that have their own agenda&quot;
so you are saying that SS can have his own opinion but the devs can&#039;t? aren&#039;t they also human? of course the devs are free to think whatever they like but that&#039;s exactly why there&#039;s people above them with the responsibility of observing everything so that the game doesn&#039;t end in &quot;on side wins all&quot; or &quot;there&#039;s nothing else you can play with&quot;, sure there is things they have done wrong (AKA bias and minor things like a single OP vehicle on a entire line) and these will keep hapenning since it&#039;s something that although undesired happen to all games, or would you say Battlefield or COD are perfect?
then there&#039;s this thing:
&quot;boring stream advertorials intended for wankers that hope a girl would let a boob out&quot;
sure it&#039;s true that amongst her followers/subscribers (or whatever) there are some/many that are there expecting that but it doesn&#039;t change the fact you are being disrespectful towards her since she doesn&#039;t do that

about TAP, what can you expect when they spend most of their time on the comment section bragging that they are better or do their articles on their own, it&#039;s not like Rita ever claimed to be a source of historical content and from what I remember SS asked us (before stoping FTR) if we would like to have Rita do the Q&amp;A translations
that&#039;s how it all started and since then many things changed, or will you actually blame others for having a life of their own? if so I can only imagine how you reacted to SS stoping FTR when he got a job with Obsidian

remember one thing, while it&#039;s true they do need us to keep doing whatever they do that doesn&#039;t mean they are our personal content criators that have to do what they do when we want to see it, even SS had in the past gone weeks without new content other than Q&amp;As but that is because he has things he has to take care that we have nothing to do with it other than respect they have the need for that
if you disagree then the next thing you will say is that when SS was sick last year he had still to create new content just for you because that&#039;s what he is here for, despite already making an effort to simply translate Q&amp;As for us]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#Barbu   you know that in the first post when he announced the return of FTR he said this wouldn&#8217;t be dedicated to WoT (for obvious reasons to someone who has followed his blog for at least 2 or 3 years) but purely historical</p>
<p>P.S: something is wrong with your head<br />
&#8220;quotes from cuddly developers that have their own agenda&#8221;<br />
so you are saying that SS can have his own opinion but the devs can&#8217;t? aren&#8217;t they also human? of course the devs are free to think whatever they like but that&#8217;s exactly why there&#8217;s people above them with the responsibility of observing everything so that the game doesn&#8217;t end in &#8220;on side wins all&#8221; or &#8220;there&#8217;s nothing else you can play with&#8221;, sure there is things they have done wrong (AKA bias and minor things like a single OP vehicle on a entire line) and these will keep hapenning since it&#8217;s something that although undesired happen to all games, or would you say Battlefield or COD are perfect?<br />
then there&#8217;s this thing:<br />
&#8220;boring stream advertorials intended for wankers that hope a girl would let a boob out&#8221;<br />
sure it&#8217;s true that amongst her followers/subscribers (or whatever) there are some/many that are there expecting that but it doesn&#8217;t change the fact you are being disrespectful towards her since she doesn&#8217;t do that</p>
<p>about TAP, what can you expect when they spend most of their time on the comment section bragging that they are better or do their articles on their own, it&#8217;s not like Rita ever claimed to be a source of historical content and from what I remember SS asked us (before stoping FTR) if we would like to have Rita do the Q&amp;A translations<br />
that&#8217;s how it all started and since then many things changed, or will you actually blame others for having a life of their own? if so I can only imagine how you reacted to SS stoping FTR when he got a job with Obsidian</p>
<p>remember one thing, while it&#8217;s true they do need us to keep doing whatever they do that doesn&#8217;t mean they are our personal content criators that have to do what they do when we want to see it, even SS had in the past gone weeks without new content other than Q&amp;As but that is because he has things he has to take care that we have nothing to do with it other than respect they have the need for that<br />
if you disagree then the next thing you will say is that when SS was sick last year he had still to create new content just for you because that&#8217;s what he is here for, despite already making an effort to simply translate Q&amp;As for us</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
