Comments on: 31.3.2014 http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/31/31-3-2014/ Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2 By: World of Tanks News 31 03 2014 http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/31/31-3-2014/#comment-133180 Tue, 01 Apr 2014 17:26:21 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10037#comment-133180 [...] Fonte – http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/31/31-3-2014/ [...]

]]> By: alex sonny http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/31/31-3-2014/#comment-133077 Tue, 01 Apr 2014 06:18:17 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10037#comment-133077 I don’t know about te camo values, but why is it so bad it’s just a bit bigger? It certainly won’t bug me, Panther was a big-ass tank IRL,

]]> By: Chad Mesiroff http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/31/31-3-2014/#comment-133059 Tue, 01 Apr 2014 02:45:59 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10037#comment-133059 Lol Tiger 1 is far and away the best T7 now there is. Thats right even better than my beloved T29.

With 1500 HP its got the same meat as a T8 heavy vs the 1150 of a T29 and if sideways its 100mm turns into 200mm effective.

On top of the fact it spits a laser beam like 88mm at 240 DMG every 5.5 secs…lol

Stop complaining about Tiger its ridiculously OP if played right.

Does the random 122mm`s 390 DMG bug me? Yes
Does the Caliber=Damage aspect bug me? Yes
Is the Tiger ever useful as an argument for a tank being UP anymore? NO!!!!

]]> By: jontheblack http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/31/31-3-2014/#comment-133049 Tue, 01 Apr 2014 01:06:15 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10037#comment-133049 Yea, no shit, the Jagdpanther is horribly inaccurate. But the Two Kv1s’s they could find, they came out just fine…… with 390 damage for balancing, To dominate the Medium companies no less.

]]> By: jontheblack http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/31/31-3-2014/#comment-133048 Tue, 01 Apr 2014 01:03:12 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10037#comment-133048 So all along we’ve been complaining that the Panther looks wrong……omg. I mean really, all the so called effort into so called balancing and now, maybe, it might be wrong, lmfao.

So, maybe, Russian Tier 6 Heavy Tanks having 390 alpha damage and a The Tiger having 240 might, maybe, be slightly wrong? MAYBE!

But now lets just make the Panther Taller. WOW.

You think maybe the IS3 might be, maybe, I mean just a little bit, slight lower then it should be…..MAYBE?

If anyone in Minsk was wondering why people are not playing WOT as much or why we complain so much, this, MIGHT, maybe, just a little bit, be a good example Serb.

]]> By: Texshi Barrett http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/31/31-3-2014/#comment-133029 Mon, 31 Mar 2014 21:53:07 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10037#comment-133029 - the amount of polygons on HD M103 wheels won’t be increased

How bout add the Tank light, like it supposed to have..

]]> By: Wittly http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/31/31-3-2014/#comment-133021 Mon, 31 Mar 2014 21:42:11 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10037#comment-133021 Nothing special after… Lame.

]]> By: Zeus67 http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/31/31-3-2014/#comment-133020 Mon, 31 Mar 2014 21:41:41 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10037#comment-133020 It seems that there is a KT on the other side and they have the same height as well.

]]> By: Balage http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/31/31-3-2014/#comment-133012 Mon, 31 Mar 2014 21:17:12 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10037#comment-133012 Someone can make a comparison? I find the same height in game as on your picture. I am confused now…

]]> By: Shapeshifter http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/31/31-3-2014/#comment-133009 Mon, 31 Mar 2014 21:07:06 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10037#comment-133009 New historical documents show all soviet tanks were actually much smaller and had -15 gun depress.

/s

]]>