<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 9.0 Patchnotes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/14/9-0-patchnotes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/14/9-0-patchnotes/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Septfox Malkier</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/14/9-0-patchnotes/#comment-138591</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Septfox Malkier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 02:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10633#comment-138591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Then apparently, something is wrong with my client: http://i1192.photobucket.com/albums/aa336/septfox/random%20mmos/Screenshot2930.jpg

Picture left uncropped so as to display that yes, this is live on the US server.

The Jackson is mislabeled, because generally tanks have their thickest *main armor* listed; that is, their upper front plate, not the transmission casing. Look at the Wolverine, for example; that thing has a surprising 114mm on its nose, but is properly labeled as 51mm for its comparatively crappy upper plate. Same with the T1, T14, M6, both tier 6 Shermans...

I&#039;m not saying it&#039;s mislabeled because it&#039;s wrong - technically, there is indeed 114mm of armor &quot;on the front&quot; - I&#039;m saying it&#039;s mislabeled because it&#039;s misleading and inconsistent with other tanks of the same general design.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then apparently, something is wrong with my client: <a href="http://i1192.photobucket.com/albums/aa336/septfox/random%20mmos/Screenshot2930.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://i1192.photobucket.com/albums/aa336/septfox/random%20mmos/Screenshot2930.jpg</a></p>
<p>Picture left uncropped so as to display that yes, this is live on the US server.</p>
<p>The Jackson is mislabeled, because generally tanks have their thickest *main armor* listed; that is, their upper front plate, not the transmission casing. Look at the Wolverine, for example; that thing has a surprising 114mm on its nose, but is properly labeled as 51mm for its comparatively crappy upper plate. Same with the T1, T14, M6, both tier 6 Shermans&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying it&#8217;s mislabeled because it&#8217;s wrong &#8211; technically, there is indeed 114mm of armor &#8220;on the front&#8221; &#8211; I&#8217;m saying it&#8217;s mislabeled because it&#8217;s misleading and inconsistent with other tanks of the same general design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dexter5021</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/14/9-0-patchnotes/#comment-138198</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dexter5021]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10633#comment-138198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- removed the table with tank tiers in the battle queue

what is the point of this?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- removed the table with tank tiers in the battle queue</p>
<p>what is the point of this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: still_guns</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/14/9-0-patchnotes/#comment-138191</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[still_guns]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10633#comment-138191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I liked Confrontation. A great shame, I often did very well in it. Maybe one day they&#039;ll reimplement it.

In other news, I&#039;ll have made another dent in my bank account soon, getting the SU-85I(!)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked Confrontation. A great shame, I often did very well in it. Maybe one day they&#8217;ll reimplement it.</p>
<p>In other news, I&#8217;ll have made another dent in my bank account soon, getting the SU-85I(!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoogleUser28</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/14/9-0-patchnotes/#comment-138184</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GoogleUser28]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10633#comment-138184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;amount of reports per day increased from 5 to 10&quot;

BEST CHANGE since 8.0!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;amount of reports per day increased from 5 to 10&#8243;</p>
<p>BEST CHANGE since 8.0!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: izzy collins</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/14/9-0-patchnotes/#comment-138131</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[izzy collins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 12:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10633#comment-138131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[that&#039;s a good point, these are Russian patch notes, not NA or EU so it may mean the SU-85i will only be on Russian servers which wouldn&#039;t be that surprising. :(]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s a good point, these are Russian patch notes, not NA or EU so it may mean the SU-85i will only be on Russian servers which wouldn&#8217;t be that surprising. :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: izzy collins</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/14/9-0-patchnotes/#comment-138119</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[izzy collins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 11:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10633#comment-138119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[-added the SU-85I premium Soviet TD to the premium shop
Am i dreaming? or dose that say what i think it says? lol WG you just hop up and throw a rare almost unseen prem into the game like it isn&#039;t that big of a deal.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>-added the SU-85I premium Soviet TD to the premium shop<br />
Am i dreaming? or dose that say what i think it says? lol WG you just hop up and throw a rare almost unseen prem into the game like it isn&#8217;t that big of a deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: piledriveryatyas</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/14/9-0-patchnotes/#comment-138072</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[piledriveryatyas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 11:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10633#comment-138072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An astute player on the WG NA Forums noticed that the RU patch notes list the SU-85i as a premium shop addition, but not the NA server patch notes. Coincidence? Or is the RU server going to be the only server with the SU-85i initially?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An astute player on the WG NA Forums noticed that the RU patch notes list the SU-85i as a premium shop addition, but not the NA server patch notes. Coincidence? Or is the RU server going to be the only server with the SU-85i initially?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lomli</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/14/9-0-patchnotes/#comment-137990</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lomli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 09:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10633#comment-137990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not sure why you would think the British don&#039;t know how to angle, I&#039;ve personally haven&#039;t had an issue with my Churchill III taking out KV&#039;s and that&#039;s when it even had the derp cannon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure why you would think the British don&#8217;t know how to angle, I&#8217;ve personally haven&#8217;t had an issue with my Churchill III taking out KV&#8217;s and that&#8217;s when it even had the derp cannon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evi7stylez .</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/14/9-0-patchnotes/#comment-137977</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[evi7stylez .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 09:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10633#comment-137977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No free slots or tanks this time, tested that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No free slots or tanks this time, tested that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BodyKnight</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/04/14/9-0-patchnotes/#comment-137976</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BodyKnight]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 08:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=10633#comment-137976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because Krupp steel was too stronk

http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/21/national-battles-confrontation-winrate-by-nation/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because Krupp steel was too stronk</p>
<p><a href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/21/national-battles-confrontation-winrate-by-nation/" rel="nofollow">http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/21/national-battles-confrontation-winrate-by-nation/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
