<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Churchill 9.1 &#8211; 9.2 Comparison</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/12/churchill-9-1-9-2-comparison/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/12/churchill-9-1-9-2-comparison/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Σύγκριση Churchill μεταξύ των εκδόσεων 9.1 και 9.2 &#124; World of Tanks</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/12/churchill-9-1-9-2-comparison/#comment-171722</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Σύγκριση Churchill μεταξύ των εκδόσεων 9.1 και 9.2 &#124; World of Tanks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2014 16:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14316#comment-171722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Πηγή: http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/12/churchill-9-1-9-2-comparison/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Πηγή: <a href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/12/churchill-9-1-9-2-comparison/" rel="nofollow">http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/12/churchill-9-1-9-2-comparison/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bugii</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/12/churchill-9-1-9-2-comparison/#comment-171557</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bugii]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2014 12:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14316#comment-171557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first picture is from tank viewer ?
Tracks are flat here.
In garage they&#039;re not... is it a different model or is the garage redered in DX11 with tesselation ?
I don&#039;t think wot supports DX11 ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first picture is from tank viewer ?<br />
Tracks are flat here.<br />
In garage they&#8217;re not&#8230; is it a different model or is the garage redered in DX11 with tesselation ?<br />
I don&#8217;t think wot supports DX11 &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen Kujou</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/12/churchill-9-1-9-2-comparison/#comment-171473</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karen Kujou]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2014 06:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14316#comment-171473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So if the 32mm front plate is added...

The Churchy won&#039;t be an easy target for us tier V with 100+ pen anymore lol. Everyone will always ain for turret when facing a Churchill I with eilte config]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if the 32mm front plate is added&#8230;</p>
<p>The Churchy won&#8217;t be an easy target for us tier V with 100+ pen anymore lol. Everyone will always ain for turret when facing a Churchill I with eilte config</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen Kujou</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/12/churchill-9-1-9-2-comparison/#comment-171472</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karen Kujou]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2014 06:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14316#comment-171472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Churchill IV is represented by the stock Churchill VII]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Churchill IV is represented by the stock Churchill VII</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JapLance</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/12/churchill-9-1-9-2-comparison/#comment-171302</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JapLance]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2014 08:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14316#comment-171302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But WoT Churchill I is not only Churchill I. It spans from Mk.I to IV, as the different guns show.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But WoT Churchill I is not only Churchill I. It spans from Mk.I to IV, as the different guns show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Witte</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/12/churchill-9-1-9-2-comparison/#comment-171283</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Witte]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2014 07:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14316#comment-171283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has the shape of the front welded on armor, and its a deeper shade of red.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has the shape of the front welded on armor, and its a deeper shade of red.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madner Kami</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/12/churchill-9-1-9-2-comparison/#comment-171280</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Madner Kami]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2014 03:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14316#comment-171280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it actually confirmed to get the extra armor? To me, it looks just like a graphical change.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it actually confirmed to get the extra armor? To me, it looks just like a graphical change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madner Kami</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/12/churchill-9-1-9-2-comparison/#comment-171279</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Madner Kami]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2014 03:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14316#comment-171279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, the Church I had it in it&#039;s hull and as long as the Church I is the Church I, it will retain it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the Church I had it in it&#8217;s hull and as long as the Church I is the Church I, it will retain it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madner Kami</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/12/churchill-9-1-9-2-comparison/#comment-171277</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Madner Kami]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2014 03:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14316#comment-171277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m a bit sad they didn&#039;t HD-ify the Black Prince first, but HDing the Church I over the Church VII is just lovely and a testament to how few people actually drive it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a bit sad they didn&#8217;t HD-ify the Black Prince first, but HDing the Church I over the Church VII is just lovely and a testament to how few people actually drive it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helldix</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/12/churchill-9-1-9-2-comparison/#comment-171252</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Helldix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2014 22:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14316#comment-171252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exactly, such a small and fast, hard to hit tank it was. :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly, such a small and fast, hard to hit tank it was. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
