Comments on: 9.3 HD Models

By: Hesk

Hesk — Sun, 31 Aug 2014 17:18:18 +0000

Oh, thanks for the information, didn’t knew that :)

By: Gappa

Gappa — Sun, 31 Aug 2014 15:12:18 +0000

No, because there won’t be any M5 derp version with open-topped turret :)

http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/31/straight-outta-supertest-reworked-m5-stuart/

By: Hesk

Hesk — Sun, 31 Aug 2014 13:47:51 +0000

Is the open-topped derp M5 Stewie going to be a HD model as well?

By: Nishizumi77

Nishizumi77 — Sun, 31 Aug 2014 12:08:52 +0000

Actually both are fake. T95 and T28 was the same IRL, the T95 was renamed later to T28 Super Heavy Tank.

By: ThePegasus1979

ThePegasus1979 — Sun, 31 Aug 2014 11:24:43 +0000

Even the Panther of the Bundeswehr museum has exactly this exhaust configuration: http://data.primeportal.net/tanks/glaubitz/jagdpanther/jagdpanther_1_of_4.jpg

By: Urie van Kerr

Urie van Kerr — Sun, 31 Aug 2014 08:37:40 +0000

Because historical tanks have priority..errrr

There are NO Historical tanks, its all compromised by balance (as it needs to be for a game), however NONE are correct in true “fact” based assessment.

The reason the French Line is ignored, pure $$$$$$, stronk Russian fantasy models = MONEY, simple fact

By: Urie van Kerr

Urie van Kerr — Sun, 31 Aug 2014 08:34:18 +0000

Just noticed, the intake pipes are also modeled in the wrong size……double FAIL

By: Urie van Kerr

Urie van Kerr — Sun, 31 Aug 2014 08:30:23 +0000

Edit: Early JP,s could of course be fitted with the 2 part barrel when the old type needed replacement

By: Urie van Kerr

Urie van Kerr — Sun, 31 Aug 2014 08:26:04 +0000

Show me ONE line of tanks that is not WG Fantasy

By: Urie van Kerr

Urie van Kerr — Sun, 31 Aug 2014 08:22:32 +0000

As shown the JagPanther is very poorly modeled and is a mix of model types. The most obvious error is the use of a one part barrel with the later bolted weapon mount, that and the exhaust stains on the rear manifold cooling intakes.

Only early type JPs had the one part barrel with the thin edged weapon mount.

No, NEVER fitted with a 10.5 or 7.5cmm l70 or the 88 L56, all total bollocks and not historical, more WG Fantasy shit.

The 2 part barrel was used as the forward section wore faster and it was easier to make with the increasing shortages of long bore machines (Older boring machines with a shorted reach could be used for the 2 part type)