But we could talk on that topic somewhere else. Anyway, it has nothing to do with the topic raised – how the site and articles are presented by their maker.

Bashing a bad troll on the other hand… good times.

Aside from him finding the “Turkish girl” cute there wasn’t actually much about booth girls and such.
He mostly focused on the talk show being lazy and boring.
(Unless it was in other posts/forums/whatever which I didn’t see)

As for the later part.
No, you’re missing the point.
It’s not about what kind of games a company makes or how good/bad these games are.
It’s advertisement.
Advertisement doesn’t care about how shitty a product is,
it cares about how to sell/promote it.

Btw, one question, why does equality mean to “push males down to the ground where females are”?
Wouldn’t it make more sense to focus on equality by putting females “up to where males are”?

For example, because I’m pretty sure I worded this awkwardly:
Instead of demonizing booth girls, ask why there are no booth men/boys.
Sexuality is one of the basic needs of humanity (Both male and female), hence there is nothing wrong with using attractiveness for advertisement.
Hence if equality is the goal, wouldn’t it be best achieved by fiving the lacking party what it lacks instead of taking it away from the one that already has it?