<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: T-34-85M Mission a Placeholder?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/03/t-34-85m-mission-a-placeholder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/03/t-34-85m-mission-a-placeholder/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: WoT - Discutii generale - Page 1701</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/03/t-34-85m-mission-a-placeholder/#comment-231117</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WoT - Discutii generale - Page 1701]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 02:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=19991#comment-231117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] T-34-85M Mission a Placeholder? &#124; For the Record  Tare sunt curios ce tanc o sa fie. Oricum am inceput grindul la francezi si chinezi sa ii duc si pe aia la tier 5... ca poate coboara limita pt misiune la tier 5 in loc de tier 6. Si cand o fi bag grind, ca o sa merga usor cu zilele premium date.      Prietenele prietenilor mei sunt si prietenele mele!       Reply With Quote [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] T-34-85M Mission a Placeholder? | For the Record  Tare sunt curios ce tanc o sa fie. Oricum am inceput grindul la francezi si chinezi sa ii duc si pe aia la tier 5&#8230; ca poate coboara limita pt misiune la tier 5 in loc de tier 6. Si cand o fi bag grind, ca o sa merga usor cu zilele premium date.      Prietenele prietenilor mei sunt si prietenele mele!       Reply With Quote [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: echoron333</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/03/t-34-85m-mission-a-placeholder/#comment-231106</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[echoron333]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2014 23:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=19991#comment-231106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like is6 has prefer. MM, WZ111 NOT, and thats the biggest problem IMO...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like is6 has prefer. MM, WZ111 NOT, and thats the biggest problem IMO&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murder3</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/03/t-34-85m-mission-a-placeholder/#comment-230891</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Murder3]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2014 16:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=19991#comment-230891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Big NO to Scorpion,big NO to the chinease heavy..It&#039;s not a premium tank, so I don&#039;t realy care the tier.
T6 russian medium is fine, especieally the T34-85 are very strong in t6 and the T34-85M even has a useful frontal armor.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big NO to Scorpion,big NO to the chinease heavy..It&#8217;s not a premium tank, so I don&#8217;t realy care the tier.<br />
T6 russian medium is fine, especieally the T34-85 are very strong in t6 and the T34-85M even has a useful frontal armor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Landric</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/03/t-34-85m-mission-a-placeholder/#comment-230863</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Landric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2014 15:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=19991#comment-230863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like this trend that seems to be appearing, different tanks for missions than those for sale.  I also have zero interest in the Scorpion, I&#039;m not a fan of tanks with zero armor (literally, it seems, with the Scorpion), no matter how fast they are.  On the other hand, the T28 Concept will be a mission tank, and more likely to be well suited to how I like to play.  I&#039;ll happily do a mission for it, then there will be no reason at all for me to buy the M56.

Same with the T-55A.  I love my T-54, and having a similar tank to train German medium crews means I will have zero need to purchase the Panther 88.  I&#039;ll happily play a mission for a 55A rather than spend real money on what is basically a Panther II with worse armor and the same matchmaking.  I&#039;d rather play a tier 9 medium than a tier 8 medium without preferential matchmaking any day of the week.

I already have an IS-7, so no real need for an Object 260, but if I can manage to get that mission done, why not?  As for the Stug IV, not really that interested, but hey, should be easy enough to get.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this trend that seems to be appearing, different tanks for missions than those for sale.  I also have zero interest in the Scorpion, I&#8217;m not a fan of tanks with zero armor (literally, it seems, with the Scorpion), no matter how fast they are.  On the other hand, the T28 Concept will be a mission tank, and more likely to be well suited to how I like to play.  I&#8217;ll happily do a mission for it, then there will be no reason at all for me to buy the M56.</p>
<p>Same with the T-55A.  I love my T-54, and having a similar tank to train German medium crews means I will have zero need to purchase the Panther 88.  I&#8217;ll happily play a mission for a 55A rather than spend real money on what is basically a Panther II with worse armor and the same matchmaking.  I&#8217;d rather play a tier 9 medium than a tier 8 medium without preferential matchmaking any day of the week.</p>
<p>I already have an IS-7, so no real need for an Object 260, but if I can manage to get that mission done, why not?  As for the Stug IV, not really that interested, but hey, should be easy enough to get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Landric</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/03/t-34-85m-mission-a-placeholder/#comment-230861</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Landric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2014 15:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=19991#comment-230861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d like to have a T-34-85M for Soviet medium crew training, I just can&#039;t bring myself to play the Matilda IV, just too boring.  So, I won&#039;t be disappointed if NA gets a mission for the 34-85, I love my regular T-34-85, and I do well enough in the Type 58 that the lower penetration gun doesn&#039;t turn me off.

WZ-111?  Well, I have the 112, but I do love my Chinese tanks, so I would eagerly grind out an IS-6 or T34 like mission for one, hopefully more like the latter, since it allowed more tiers.  I will, however, have to grind some credits.  I sold a lot of lower tier tanks in my garage recently to buy three tier tens (FV4202, 121, E100) while they were on sale last weekend, and I&#039;ll need to buy some of them back.

M56?  No interest.  While I would like a premium US TD, the whole thing comes rather late for me.  I sold my Hellcat post nerf, I have the E4 in my garage, and I&#039;m about halfway to the E3.  I&#039;m not really in need of US TD crew training anymore.  Plus, the T28 Concept looks like more my style than the M56, and with it being available in the new missions after the new year, I have no interest in grinding out the M56.  I don&#039;t expect to buy it either when it appears for sale.

So, my preference is actually the T34-85M, but I&#039;d also be excited by a WZ-111.  Hoping it will be one of the two.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to have a T-34-85M for Soviet medium crew training, I just can&#8217;t bring myself to play the Matilda IV, just too boring.  So, I won&#8217;t be disappointed if NA gets a mission for the 34-85, I love my regular T-34-85, and I do well enough in the Type 58 that the lower penetration gun doesn&#8217;t turn me off.</p>
<p>WZ-111?  Well, I have the 112, but I do love my Chinese tanks, so I would eagerly grind out an IS-6 or T34 like mission for one, hopefully more like the latter, since it allowed more tiers.  I will, however, have to grind some credits.  I sold a lot of lower tier tanks in my garage recently to buy three tier tens (FV4202, 121, E100) while they were on sale last weekend, and I&#8217;ll need to buy some of them back.</p>
<p>M56?  No interest.  While I would like a premium US TD, the whole thing comes rather late for me.  I sold my Hellcat post nerf, I have the E4 in my garage, and I&#8217;m about halfway to the E3.  I&#8217;m not really in need of US TD crew training anymore.  Plus, the T28 Concept looks like more my style than the M56, and with it being available in the new missions after the new year, I have no interest in grinding out the M56.  I don&#8217;t expect to buy it either when it appears for sale.</p>
<p>So, my preference is actually the T34-85M, but I&#8217;d also be excited by a WZ-111.  Hoping it will be one of the two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Lova Lova</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/03/t-34-85m-mission-a-placeholder/#comment-230845</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr Lova Lova]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2014 15:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=19991#comment-230845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I want the premium T-34, an iconic tank, not some shitty TD or Chinese tank.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want the premium T-34, an iconic tank, not some shitty TD or Chinese tank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Odmenou za vianočné misie ničeo lepšie ako T-34/85M?</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/03/t-34-85m-mission-a-placeholder/#comment-230842</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Odmenou za vianočné misie ničeo lepšie ako T-34/85M?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2014 15:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=19991#comment-230842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Zdroj: http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/03/t-34-85m-mission-a-placeholder/ [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Zdroj: <a href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/03/t-34-85m-mission-a-placeholder/" rel="nofollow">http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/03/t-34-85m-mission-a-placeholder/</a> [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marián Markovič</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/03/t-34-85m-mission-a-placeholder/#comment-230802</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marián Markovič]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2014 14:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=19991#comment-230802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[350k Its not that bad,... considering Holidays,.. x3 x5 events, possible u will have chance to get some premium accounts,... in the end i could be just make 100k standart xp (of course depends how many tanks u got in garage)
I did SP mission, gived up on IS6 couse chinesse t6 just didnt suits my style and houlidays teams.
Not sure baut T34-85m,.. if it will have Types 58 gun,.. hope it will at least have some depresion like standart T34-85]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>350k Its not that bad,&#8230; considering Holidays,.. x3 x5 events, possible u will have chance to get some premium accounts,&#8230; in the end i could be just make 100k standart xp (of course depends how many tanks u got in garage)<br />
I did SP mission, gived up on IS6 couse chinesse t6 just didnt suits my style and houlidays teams.<br />
Not sure baut T34-85m,.. if it will have Types 58 gun,.. hope it will at least have some depresion like standart T34-85</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vlada1616</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/03/t-34-85m-mission-a-placeholder/#comment-230796</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vlada1616]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2014 14:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=19991#comment-230796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not 3000mm pen, my typo...but 300mm pen]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not 3000mm pen, my typo&#8230;but 300mm pen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vlada1616</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/03/t-34-85m-mission-a-placeholder/#comment-230790</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vlada1616]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2014 14:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=19991#comment-230790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HEAT that WZ-111 has as premium ammo, has pen 3000mm. They did not nerf it, because it was tank only for the China server. He still has 300mm pen for HEAT ammo.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HEAT that WZ-111 has as premium ammo, has pen 3000mm. They did not nerf it, because it was tank only for the China server. He still has 300mm pen for HEAT ammo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
