<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 28.1.2015 (Part II)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/28/28-1-2015-part-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/28/28-1-2015-part-ii/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 29. 1. 2015</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/28/28-1-2015-part-ii/#comment-257080</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[29. 1. 2015]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 20:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21740#comment-257080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/28/28-1-2015-part-ii/ [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] <a href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/28/28-1-2015-part-ii/" rel="nofollow">http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/28/28-1-2015-part-ii/</a> [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mistermex1</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/28/28-1-2015-part-ii/#comment-256868</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mistermex1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 16:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21740#comment-256868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They dont want to remove the wte100 just because it is compleate fake, but because it is problematic as well. Read what the devs said earlier either tanks that are too unhistorical or problematic will get phase out. Is3 is historical as fuck compared to wte100 even with the bl9 because I think SS mentioned that they proposed a bl9 gun for it or m62 or something like that. What we know though is that there was some kind of idea to mount a upgraded 122mm on the is3. How ever we dont know what the rof and depression would be. 

Just like the vk045b, that is also overbuffed to the extent that it is not historical. The armor was never that thick, at most the armor could be like on the vk045a (which is a more sane armor upgrade looking at the original armor thickness). Also the gun and turret is fake on the vk045b there were never historical proposals for a 12.8cm gun. A 10.5cm gun at most.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They dont want to remove the wte100 just because it is compleate fake, but because it is problematic as well. Read what the devs said earlier either tanks that are too unhistorical or problematic will get phase out. Is3 is historical as fuck compared to wte100 even with the bl9 because I think SS mentioned that they proposed a bl9 gun for it or m62 or something like that. What we know though is that there was some kind of idea to mount a upgraded 122mm on the is3. How ever we dont know what the rof and depression would be. </p>
<p>Just like the vk045b, that is also overbuffed to the extent that it is not historical. The armor was never that thick, at most the armor could be like on the vk045a (which is a more sane armor upgrade looking at the original armor thickness). Also the gun and turret is fake on the vk045b there were never historical proposals for a 12.8cm gun. A 10.5cm gun at most.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mistermex1</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/28/28-1-2015-part-ii/#comment-256861</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mistermex1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 16:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21740#comment-256861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WG save tanks for future implementations its not economicly viable to release all &quot;good&quot; tanks at once. They rather keep some tanks to introduce them later and nerf/rebalance/make older tenks premium so people spend money to rebuy their old tanks and retrain crew skills or what ever. 

That is why the are holding out on french and japanese tanks and even chinese tanks such as arty and TD. They do it by purpose.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WG save tanks for future implementations its not economicly viable to release all &#8220;good&#8221; tanks at once. They rather keep some tanks to introduce them later and nerf/rebalance/make older tenks premium so people spend money to rebuy their old tanks and retrain crew skills or what ever. </p>
<p>That is why the are holding out on french and japanese tanks and even chinese tanks such as arty and TD. They do it by purpose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mistermex1</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/28/28-1-2015-part-ii/#comment-256859</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mistermex1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 16:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21740#comment-256859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Much worse accuracy&quot;..well the is3 was not designed as a sniper in wot so it kinda makes sense to balance it accordingly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Much worse accuracy&#8221;..well the is3 was not designed as a sniper in wot so it kinda makes sense to balance it accordingly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tankbuster_CZ</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/28/28-1-2015-part-ii/#comment-256841</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tankbuster_CZ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 16:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21740#comment-256841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Man what about this? just find T32... -10 gun depression,same as in WT:GF and WoT...so your source?    http://www.stardestroyer.net/Armour/EBooks/FirepowerDataSheets.pdf]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man what about this? just find T32&#8230; -10 gun depression,same as in WT:GF and WoT&#8230;so your source?    <a href="http://www.stardestroyer.net/Armour/EBooks/FirepowerDataSheets.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.stardestroyer.net/Armour/EBooks/FirepowerDataSheets.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CN1994</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/28/28-1-2015-part-ii/#comment-256765</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CN1994]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 14:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21740#comment-256765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More than decent? Its a good gun. Not more.

Penetration is the same as on Tiger 2.
Accuracy is much worse. 
Aimtime, too.
It has more alpha-dmg thats all. 
In my oppinion, the IS-3 with Tiger 2 gun would be way better than with the BL-9. Btw: If the D-25T fits in that turret, it could not be THAT hard to fit the BL-9 in there. If it&#039;s a historical proposition is the other question.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than decent? Its a good gun. Not more.</p>
<p>Penetration is the same as on Tiger 2.<br />
Accuracy is much worse.<br />
Aimtime, too.<br />
It has more alpha-dmg thats all.<br />
In my oppinion, the IS-3 with Tiger 2 gun would be way better than with the BL-9. Btw: If the D-25T fits in that turret, it could not be THAT hard to fit the BL-9 in there. If it&#8217;s a historical proposition is the other question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fighting_falcon93</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/28/28-1-2015-part-ii/#comment-256745</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fighting_falcon93]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 14:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21740#comment-256745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, if we&#039;re going to be entirely honest here, there&#039;s loads of other completely fake things in WoT. Just look at some of the game mechanics for instance:

1. The spotting mechanics is also completely fake. A tank won&#039;t be spotted by the crew just because there&#039;s a continuous line between a tanks cupola and a special dot on another tank.

2. The camouflage mechanics is also completely fake. A tank don&#039;t have a magical value that tells it how well it will stay hidden... that completely depends on how well you hide it.

3. The HP mechanics is also completely fake. If a AP-shell penetrates the armor it will travel into the crew compartment and kill everyone inside, not subtract HP from a fake value representing HP.

and maybe most important of all:

4. All tanks that were actually not produced are also fake since they actually never where produced. Prototypes and &quot;paper-tanks&quot; are allowed in game, and who says that WT auf E-100 actually wasn&#039;t a real drawing? I mean, WG made up the idea of WT auf E-100 from somewhere, why wouldn&#039;t Germany possibly have done the same? Just becouse it&#039;s not in the archives doesn&#039;t mean it was never drawed/considered.

Bottom line is that I don&#039;t actually care so much about the tank itself as I&#039;m fairly disappointed that the replacement will not have an autoloader... that was kind of the goal of grinding that line; the accuracy, penetration, damage, reload... that cannon was so nice and now they will remove it :(]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if we&#8217;re going to be entirely honest here, there&#8217;s loads of other completely fake things in WoT. Just look at some of the game mechanics for instance:</p>
<p>1. The spotting mechanics is also completely fake. A tank won&#8217;t be spotted by the crew just because there&#8217;s a continuous line between a tanks cupola and a special dot on another tank.</p>
<p>2. The camouflage mechanics is also completely fake. A tank don&#8217;t have a magical value that tells it how well it will stay hidden&#8230; that completely depends on how well you hide it.</p>
<p>3. The HP mechanics is also completely fake. If a AP-shell penetrates the armor it will travel into the crew compartment and kill everyone inside, not subtract HP from a fake value representing HP.</p>
<p>and maybe most important of all:</p>
<p>4. All tanks that were actually not produced are also fake since they actually never where produced. Prototypes and &#8220;paper-tanks&#8221; are allowed in game, and who says that WT auf E-100 actually wasn&#8217;t a real drawing? I mean, WG made up the idea of WT auf E-100 from somewhere, why wouldn&#8217;t Germany possibly have done the same? Just becouse it&#8217;s not in the archives doesn&#8217;t mean it was never drawed/considered.</p>
<p>Bottom line is that I don&#8217;t actually care so much about the tank itself as I&#8217;m fairly disappointed that the replacement will not have an autoloader&#8230; that was kind of the goal of grinding that line; the accuracy, penetration, damage, reload&#8230; that cannon was so nice and now they will remove it :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loulaki</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/28/28-1-2015-part-ii/#comment-256665</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[loulaki]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 13:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21740#comment-256665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- Super Pershing in HD will come “very soon”


yeah, it was my first tank as a reward from missions, and my most played !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- Super Pershing in HD will come “very soon”</p>
<p>yeah, it was my first tank as a reward from missions, and my most played !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CAMO_RAY</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/28/28-1-2015-part-ii/#comment-256604</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CAMO_RAY]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 11:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21740#comment-256604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WT E-100 is completely fake, IS-3 could actually have a possibility of having that gun (even tho it didn&#039;t get the gun IRL)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WT E-100 is completely fake, IS-3 could actually have a possibility of having that gun (even tho it didn&#8217;t get the gun IRL)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CAMO_RAY</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/28/28-1-2015-part-ii/#comment-256603</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CAMO_RAY]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 11:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21740#comment-256603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yeah i noticed that too LOL, i thought, &quot;that&#039;s definitely changed, but it looks worse now.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah i noticed that too LOL, i thought, &#8220;that&#8217;s definitely changed, but it looks worse now.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
