Comments on: Light Tank Q&A http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/01/light-tank-qa/ Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2 By: Mapy, 30B a 305mm houfnice - Rychlá Rota http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/01/light-tank-qa/#comment-259117 Tue, 03 Feb 2015 14:17:18 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21821#comment-259117 […] http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/01/light-tank-qa/ http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/30/0-9-6-undocumented-vehicle-changes/ […]

]]> By: theepictanker100 http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/01/light-tank-qa/#comment-259010 Mon, 02 Feb 2015 22:25:34 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21821#comment-259010 They don’t care about how bad the AMX 13 75 is…

]]> By: nenshou http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/01/light-tank-qa/#comment-258566 Mon, 02 Feb 2015 07:09:00 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21821#comment-258566 “- AMX 12t is fine statistically, many players play it”.

Yes, the fact that it is the only way to batchat has nothing to do with how many people play it.I truly hope their way to determine the strength/popularity of a tank is not by how many players play it..

]]> By: Benedict Wong http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/01/light-tank-qa/#comment-258550 Mon, 02 Feb 2015 04:19:53 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21821#comment-258550 So the AMX 13/90 will remain useless as always. Can’t fight can’t spot.

]]> By: L0rd_0f_War http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/01/light-tank-qa/#comment-258540 Mon, 02 Feb 2015 02:27:08 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21821#comment-258540 Yes, and don’t forget reinventing the two year old RNG features and failing at all the newly developed features like havoc takes a lot of time…

]]> By: GuySensei http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/01/light-tank-qa/#comment-258520 Mon, 02 Feb 2015 00:22:05 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21821#comment-258520 Jfc imagine reward arty…. sheesh.

]]> By: GuySensei http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/01/light-tank-qa/#comment-258518 Mon, 02 Feb 2015 00:21:02 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21821#comment-258518 Fix is generally accepted as a synonym for improve via repairs. The operative word being….. well… improve…

]]> By: JBadger http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/01/light-tank-qa/#comment-258492 Sun, 01 Feb 2015 23:36:51 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21821#comment-258492 Wargaming only uses the term “Historical” when it suits them.

]]> By: noobz http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/01/light-tank-qa/#comment-258470 Sun, 01 Feb 2015 22:04:23 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21821#comment-258470 those were all reclassified for balance reasons. mainly not losing camo value while moving.
why would anyone want the AMX to be changed???? you have the LT camo buff (although im sure the amx has crap camo) and if it was a med you would need to pay for the vehicle type transfer(crew) twice! once for getting from LT to MT and once from MT to LT.

]]> By: sunnykim http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/01/light-tank-qa/#comment-258462 Sun, 01 Feb 2015 21:50:46 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=21821#comment-258462 ” AMX-40 was classified as a light tank, not much WG can do about it”

yeah… because there arent already tanks in the game running around as td’s or td’s running around as arty…. T18….. ELC AMX….etc….. wtf do you mean you cant do anything about it lol.

]]>