Comments on: WT E-100 and GW E-100 Replacements

By: atterdag

atterdag — Tue, 03 Feb 2015 22:56:39 +0000

Here’s a small sample from tank-compare.com to show how inconsistent the velocity is:

88 mm Pak 32 L/71, and 88 cm KwK 43 L/71 have a velocity of 1000 m/s for AP, and 1250 m/s for APCR
88 mm Pak 32 L/100, and 88 cm KwK 43 L/71 have a velocity of 1150 m/s for AP, and 1438 m/s for APCR
90 mm Bordkanone has a velocity of 1000 m/s for AP, and 1250 m/s for APCR
105 mm L/52 Ausf. B has a velocity of 1200 m/s for AP, and 1500 m/s for ACPR
105 mm L/52 Ausf. K has a velocity of 1478 m/s for APCR
105 mm Bordkanone L7A3 has a velocity of 1478 m/s for APCR
105 mm KwK L/70 has a velocity of 1150 m/s for AP, and 1438 m/s for APCR
128 mm KwK 44 L/55 has a velocity of 920 m/s for AP, and 1150 m/s for APCR
128 mm L/61, and 128 mm L/66 both have a velocity of 1200 m/s for AP shells, and 1500 m/s for APCR

By: Mapy, 30B a 305mm houfnice - Rychlá Rota

Mapy, 30B a 305mm houfnice - Rychlá Rota — Tue, 03 Feb 2015 14:17:12 +0000

[…] http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/02/01/wt-e-100-and-gw-e-100-replacements/ […]

By: eNumbra

eNumbra — Tue, 03 Feb 2015 02:44:28 +0000

- Oh yea, and they want to replace the fake GW E-100 with GW Tiger (of sorts, the superstructure is different) with 305mm mortar (Czechoslovak Škoda B20 actually). Alpha ftw! :)

Retarded alpha is ok for Arty, but the Sturmtiger is “unbalanceable”. Fuck the dev team.

By: 23r0_NA

23r0_NA — Mon, 02 Feb 2015 19:53:01 +0000

A Waffentraeger Panther without an autoloader huh? That thing had better have a turret and at the very least keep the 128 mm gun with its unmatched accuracy to be worth the grind. I prefer end-tier vehicles to be unique in some way compared to their counterparts usually, which the WT E-100 is, even if it’s a bit broken.

By: D8W2P4

D8W2P4 — Mon, 02 Feb 2015 18:41:53 +0000

I have to ask how would it be on balance if the Jagdpanzer E-100 had access to the Jagdtiger’s top gun, maybe with adjusted side to side gun arc depending on gun used?

By: D8W2P4

D8W2P4 — Mon, 02 Feb 2015 18:08:22 +0000

Woras I want you to think for 1 fucking second, you’re “wanting” a more historical artillery piece that is even MORE lethal than ANY current artillery in the game.

Seriously I hope AW blows WoT the fuck out of the gaming business, but if somehow it doesn’t (which while hopefully slim is a real possibility) and we have to come back to this shithole game, are you sure that you want to have to deal with a 305mm mortar? Because I sure as hell don’t.

By: alexander__l

alexander__l — Mon, 02 Feb 2015 12:52:31 +0000

Was talking about the gun handling. Imagine 11 secs reload and phenomenal accuracy.

And the jt has Ok armor, but definitely Not good one.

By: ComradeHX

ComradeHX — Mon, 02 Feb 2015 12:24:21 +0000

It’s never balanced enough for arty players until one shot landing 10m away is enough to one-shot a Maus.

By: Bytez_DMK

Bytez_DMK — Mon, 02 Feb 2015 12:16:17 +0000

? The JT has also great armor… I knew the WT Panther since years (2WW is my Hobby) and there is no armor.. Still cant get it ;D

By: alexander__l

alexander__l — Mon, 02 Feb 2015 12:07:52 +0000

Imagine a 15cm JT. Sounds good enough for me.