Source: wot-news.com
Repair changes are percentual (-5 = 5 percent cheaper to repair f.x.)
Germany
| E-75 | -5 |
| VK4502B | -5 |
| E-100 | -5 |
| Maus | -5 |
| E-50M | -7 |
| Bison | 82 |
| Sturmpanzer II | 40 |
| GW Tiger | 20 |
USSR
| SU-14-2 | 111 |
| 212A | 31 |
| IS-8 | -5 |
| ST-1 | -5 |
| IS-4 | -10 |
| T-62A | -3 |
USA
| M2LT | 200 |
| T2MT | 200 |
| M103 | -5 |
| T110E5 | -5 |
| T30 | -10 |
| M7 Priest | -25 |
| M37 | 38 |
| M40/43 | -20 |
Great Britain
| Tortoise | -5 |
| Conqueror | -5 |
| FV215b HT | -10 |
France
| AMX50 120 | -5 |
| Batchat25t | -5 |
| AMX13 105AM | -13 |
| Lorraine155 51 | -20 |
China
| WZ111 1-4 | -5 |
Pretty good news, though my M2 LT just got 200% more expensive to repair. Ah well… :)
Isnt it 400%? as 100 would actually mean a double?
and the 50b?
If it’s not here, then there was no change.
Ar ju fakin kidin mi???
Tortoise 5% cheaper to repair, might mean it will become a bit more profitable.
Man… they sure don’t like the Bison.
Are you sure with +111% on Su-14? It wasnt that cheap to begin with and other arties in that range see nothing even close to this (m40/43 actually gets cheaper).
Is the T2 LT and T2 MT accurate? 200%? O.O