Bulgarian Armor – part I

Hello everyone,

today we will have a look at one of the armored forces, that gets often neglected by literature and usually deserves no more than small articles behind the Axis section: the armor of Bulgaria.

After World War I, in which the Bulgarian kingdom fought on Central Powers’ side and lost, its army was severely weakened and – as with other former Central Powers – forced by the Allies to accept certain conditions, limiting the number of men and weapons, while other types of weapons (including armored vehicles) being banned outright. The Allied committee, that oversaw the disarming of Bulgaria, openly favoured Yugoslavia and Greece and the terms were very strict. This, combined with the regional specifics (Balkan peninsula always was a powderkeg of sorts), planted a part of the seeds, that would eventually grow into the most destructive conflict in human history.

At first, the treaties were kept, but the situation changed in early 30′s, as clouds started to gather over Europe once again. The dawn of the nazi regime in Germany, Hungarian slow re-arming and Romania’s attempts to revisit the Trianon system did influence the Bulgarian armed forces also and from that point, active effort was conducted to “catch up” with the world trends. And the “flavour of the year” in early 30′s was the tankette.

The first armored vehicles to appear in Bulgaria were 14 Carro Veloce CV33 tankettes, purchased from Fiat Ansaldo, Italy.

Those tankettes were only lightweight vehicles however, armed with machineguns and by no means proper tanks. Bulgarian army requested something a bit heavier – and in 1937, Buglaria managed to purchase 8 Vickers Type E Mod.B tanks in Britain. These were armed with 47mm Vickers guns – and finally brought some firepower.

However, tanks are just the beginning. No fighting force could be effective without logistics and support. As the other armies of the region at that time, Bulgarian army was largely relying on horses, which was by no means sufficient. Therefore, in order to improve the logistics situation (at least in some units, including the armored ones), Buglaria also ordered 100 additional Opel trucks from Germany and 50 Italian Pavesi artillery tractors. Thus, by 1938, the Bulgarian army 338 trucks, 100 special vehicles, 160 ambulance vehicles, 50 tractors and 22 tanks. All the tracks and special vehicles were allocated to infantry and artillery units, while the tanks were split into two companies, called First (Second) company with armored vehicles.

In addition to improving the general arms situation, Bulgarian army did attept to improve their armored vehicles further. For mostly political, but also historical reasons, Bulgarians did turn to Germany for help with that undertaking. Of course, the Germans were happy to help – for two reasons actually:

- first, the Germans counted on increasing their influence on Bulgarian leadership (a gamble which later failed, but we’ll get to that)
- second, the Germans didn’t have to give out “their” vehicles at all, for it was late 1938 already and the Wehrmacht had the whole stock of former Czechoslovak army to pick from.

Bulgarian T-11′s (improved LT-35 tanks):

The Buglarians were no strangers to Czechoslovak tech. The first time they actually showed interest in it was as early as 1928, when they tried (unsuccessfully) to purchase the PA-II armored cars. They showed interest again in 1936 (this time to buy tanks), but at that time Czechoslovakia decided to tread carefully and to keep the WW1 treaties, not allowing Bulgarians to have their own armored forces. In 1937, the Czechoslovak army command agreed to sell only the Š-I, Š-I-D and Praga Ah-IV tankettes, but the LT-35, which the Bulgarians liked the most, was not cleared for export. Same thing happened a year later with the LTH tanks, produced for Switzerland.

But at that point the times changed already. As one of the last acts of still “free” (but maimed) Czechoslovakia, in February 1939, a number of light tanks (including the LT-35) were shown to the Buglarian delegation. Bulgarians at that point considered buying 50 Š-I (the infamous Vzor 33) tankettes and 40 LT-35 tanks. In March 1939, Czechoslovakia was occupied and it was now the Germans, who called the shots. This delayed the Bulgarian purchases significantly.

In June 1939, Bulgarian general Rusi Rusev negotiated the sale of former Czechoslovak tanks in Berlin, arguing that Bulgaria was threatened by Turkey in the south, asking for at least 26 armored vehicles. A month later, Bulgarian prime minister Georgi Kyoseivanov demanded 30 to 40 tanks already. After some negotiations, Hitler decided on 22.7.1939 to allow “friendly” countries to purchase German-owned armor. Details were hammered out in August 1939 and the Germans agreed to transfer 26 LT-35 tanks (at that point, called Panzerkampfwagen L.T.M.35 – a direct translation of the Czech name) from the elite 11th Panzer regiment in Paderborn. These were first transferred to Pilsen for checkup, however the repairs on German vehicles, damaged in Poland, slowed that process significantly and the first 21 LT-35 tanks arrived in Sofia only in February 1940, the other 5 in April. 13 of these vehicles were renamed to “Lek Tank Škoda Š-35” (“Light tank Škoda Š-35L) and then transferred to (or rather forming) the 3rd Armored Company (under the command of captain Bosilkov). All three companies were formed into an Armored batallion (Bronirana druzhina), commanded from Sofia.

However, by March 1940, Bulgarians started demanding even more vehicles, specifically 40 more LT-35′s. Needless to say, the Germans were not happy (they were building their own forces for the assault on Russia) and Škoda Pilsen thus had none to spare. Instead, they offered the Bulgarians 10 pieces of the T-11 tank.

Škoda T-11

Škoda T-11 was based on the famous LT-35 (or Panzer 35t, as it is known in World of Tanks) light tank. What happened was that after this vehicle was accepted for service in Czechoslovak army between 1935 and 1936, a number of bugs and flaws (mostly of maintenance procedure character) was discovered on these vehicles. A lot of them were “fixed” in the field by the crewmen, but the vehicle was still judged as complicated to repair and fragile. These flaws showed especially when the vehicle was operated in winter, requiring often the moving of the entire tank away from the unit to army repair centers, or even to the factory.

Needless to say, the army was not happy about that and when Škoda took part in 1937 comparative tank trials for the new cavalry tank with the improved Š-IIa (LT-35), they failed miserably. Škoda reacted on the failure with a reconstructed version of the LT-35, the development of which started in November 1938. The new tank was based on the LT-35 hull, but had a bigger 140hp engine and improved transmission, increasing its maximum speed to 40km/h. Further improvements included a more powerful gun, the 37mm Škoda A7. The prototype was designated LT vzor 40 at first, but after the occupation in 1939, the development of it was stopped (only to appear later, but that goes beyond this article).

Some improvements from it however were made on the basic LT-35 vehicle itself. This version caught the eye of a rather exotic customer: Afghanistan. A special version (designated Š-IIa-A) was made and in February 1939, Afghanistan signed a contract for 10 pieces of this tank. The vehicles were manufactured in 1939 under German supervision already – Germans had nothing against the deal and in February 1940, all the vehicles were ready. An Afghan committee officially accepted them in March 1940, but by that time, it was impossible to transport them to Afghanistan because of the war, and so Škoda was forced to look for a different customer. Along came Bulgaria, which was interested – a contract was signed on 20.6.1940 (or late May, sources differ), with all ten vehicles being delivered from September 1940 to early January 1941. Interestingly enough, BOTH the classic LT-35 and the T-11 were named Lek tank Škoda Š-35.

Compared to the serial LT-35, the T-11 tanks had some improvements, including improved transmission and German Telefunken radio – but the most important change was the new modern gun, the 37mm Škoda A8 cannon (vzor 1939). This gun used the same ammo as the earlier 37mm A3 (vzor 1934), but the recoil mechanism was completely reworked – the gun now had short recoil, semi-automatic breech and improved shell ejection system. A T-11 can instantly be recognized from the LT-35 by the missing hydraulic recoil cylinder above the gun. Armor and engine properties however remained pretty much the same as on the LT-35.

Crew: 4
Weight: 10,5 tons
Engine: Škoda T-11/0, 120hp
Armor: 25mm front, 16mm sides, 16mm back
Gun: 37mm Škoda A8
Maximum speed: 34 km/h

In World of Tanks terms, you can “try out” the T-11 even now: it’s the stock Panzer 35t with 3rd gun (the improved 37mm).


Back to Bulgaria – Bulgarian armor saw first “action” in South Dobrudja, a region annexed by Romania after WW1, in June 1940 (the region was later “awarded” to Bulgaria in September). 1st Company took part in the operation. Still in 1940, both companies were moved to the Koren polygon (near the city of Lyubimec) close to the border with Turkey and took part in training.

With Poland and France defeated and the war with Russia coming, Bulgaria decided finally to throw their lot in with the Germans. This decision was influenced by the fact that after the failure of Italians in Greece, Bulgaria was basically bullied by the threat of German invasion. The pre-war Bulgarian dreams of easily acquiring some land while not having to actually JOIN the Axis forces disappeared.

On 1st March of 1941, Bulgaria joined the Axis powers formally and on 2nd March, German 12th Army entered Bulgarian territory. After that, a series of military excercises was conducted between the Germans and the Bulgarian army, some with the presence of Bulgarian tsar Boris III.

At some point in 1941 (sources differ as to when), Germans also supplied the Bulgarian army with 40 French Renault R-35 light tanks. These were captured in June 1940 in France and – much to Bulgarian dismay – they were in very poor shape. Their combat value also was quite dubious and some of them were immediately transferred to training units.

4th Armored Company was formed from the rest. In the meanwhile, on 25.6.1941, all 4 companies (with 2 more added were united into Bulgaria’s first Armored Regiment (“Broniran Polk”). This regiment was situated in Sofia and consisted of 6 companies. The armored force of the regiment consisted of the Vickers tanks (still in service), the R-35′s and the LT-35′s, as well as 24 Opel Blitz 3-ton trucks, 16 BMW and 2 Praga motorbikes. The regiment was commanded by general Genov. By 15.8.1941, the regiment had 3809 servicemen and its command staff undertook special training in Germany.

From 7.9.1941 to 21.9.1941, the regiment went to train near the town of Jambol. During this excercise, the Š-35 tanks proved to be reliable and to have good terrain passability despite heavy rain during the march from Nova Zagora – unlike the R-35, which broke down all over the place and was generally hated by its crews.

V.Shpakovskij, O.Ivanov: Bronetechnika Bolgarii 1935-1945
I.Pejčoch – Obrněná technika
Kalojan Matev – Bronetankova tekhnika 1935-1945
Various posts at Axis History Forum and valka.cz

25 thoughts on “Bulgarian Armor – part I

  1. As a Bulgarian it is a great honor to see an article for my country in such a great blog! :)
    I want to announce that since May this year we have a new museum which has fully restored Pz-4s and Stugs from WW2. The very same which were gifted by Nazi Germany to my little country. :)

      • Quick question, SilentStalker – are you fluent in Bulgarian? I ask because I gather the language is not as similar to Russian as one might first think. My gf is a native Bulgarian but only understands a token amount of Russian.

        • I can read it normally, but speaking is a bit hard for me now, it’s been years. There are some similiarities (as far as slavic languages go), but the languages are quite different, yes.

          • Nah, its not the Voenno-istoricheski muzei (military-historic museum…i dont know how to translate it exactly on english). The guys behind Voenno-istoricheski muzei are dumbasses. They let the flag of Prinz Eugens SS division was stolen 1 month ago. The museu, i was talking about is located in Jambol, a small town in eastern Bulgaria(actually i was born there :) ) ,which some years ago had several tank batallions, which are now dismissed. Its called “Музей на Бойната слава”…roughly translated to: Museum of Battle Fame

          • Cool :) I’d say it translates more like War glory museum… if I ever make it to Bulgaria again, I’ll go and have a look, thank you :)

          • Well “museum of War Glory” sounds about right… As for the article, I really liked it and looking forward to Pt. 2 ;)

    • Oo which museum is it?

      I’ve recently become a huge tank nut and would love to see some German tanks.

      I haven’t actually visited a museum recently and when I had I wasn’t that interested in tanks.

      Anyway thanks a bunch to the author of these posts they are actually quite interesting and completely historically accurate.

      PS The traffic police-man next to the tank in the final photo is hilarious. xD

  2. Hey SS, can you please create lets say some “toggle paragraphs” in your articles? Especially with many pictures, each article grows quite a bit so we have to scroll often. I think it would help if you could put some blocks into “toggle” areas or something similar if you know what I mean? Would maintain a clear view on the articles.
    What do you think?

  3. Hi Silentstalker!
    I would like to bring your attention to some very interesting restoration projects in Bulgaria.
    Some info about the German armor left rotting in Bulgaria after WW2


    a nice information article in the forums with lots of pictures:


    Some information about the restoration effort:

    http://www.traditsia.com/forum/showthread.php?t=4440 (forum with some more pictures and text in bulgarian (sorry )

    if you want to find out more information i would be happy to dig some more for you and translate it.

  4. are army ( as i am a Bulgarian ) never lost a battle on the field or a flag, but we lost allot of wars due to bad politics

  5. SS, I honestly have no idea who or why designed the PzIV with Zis-3 hybrid, and I am not sure anyone would know. In threads on the new museum in Yambol, it is described as “vehicle awaiting restoration”.

    To better understand the issue, here is a brief history of the museum and its collection: it is a brand new museum which was created on the grounds of the old barracks in Yambol, Bulgaria. There were attempts to sell the land to private individuals for redevelopment, but those were thwarted and instead the Ministry of Defense relented to putting a museum on the property.

    The tanks were all dug out from a defensive line along Bulgaria’s southern border (mostly with Turkey). Back in the day, when the Bulgarian Army switched to Soviet equipment and the WW2 German armor was obsolete, instead of selling to the Middle East or using the panzers as targets, someone had the idea of using the tanks to create fixed defensive positions along the Warsaw Pact’s southern border.

    The tanks rusted away until “entrepreneurial” spirits started looting the defensive line, lifting off bits and pieces for scrap metal value. Ultimately, an army officer attempted to export a whole vehicle to a collector in Germany, but was caught at customs. That incident helped the Ministry of Defense realize that the dug in remains were actually worth a lot more than their value as scrap. Finally, the tanks were dug out, taken to Yambol where local enthusiast restored them on a really low budget (the paint and labor were all donated) and finally after years of red tape gifted to the new museum by the Ministry of Defense (for a while it was not clear who held title to the tanks, funny story).

    Long story short, I am guessing the curious hybrid is connected to the history of the defensive line along Bulgaria’s southern border. Perhaps the PzIV’s turret was removed to be placed on a bunker, and then some “engineer” decided that slapping a Su-76 gun on the hull and digging the whole thing into the ground would make a fine defensive position as well.

    The thread in Traditsia linked above is good, feel welcome to come in and ask questions in English on that tank or on the Czech tanks used in Bulgaria or on anything else tank related: there are knowledgeable people there that may be able to provide answers.


  6. SS, As a Bulgarian, i thank you for making such an article.

    Also, did you know that the few Panthers that Germany gifted Bulgaria were recicled and used to make cutlery?
    So one of us may be eating from a spoon made out of Panther metal. :D

  7. awesome article I hope that the next part will include some of Bulgarian modifications

    also liked Pivka museum articles… Pivka has the best preserved and maintained exhibits of all ex-Yu states and thay also use correct historical color schemes

  8. Nice article. Always interesting to read about the “little guys”.
    I have a question though, what do you mean by:
    “…Romania’s attempts to revisit the Trianon system…” ?
    AFAIK, Romania was pretty contempt with the territorial gains after WWI and didn’t have any other revisionist demands.

  9. Pingback: Bulgarian Armor – part II | For The Record

  10. Pingback: Bulgarian Armor – part III | For The Record

  11. Pingback: Sofia Military Museum pictures | For The Record