46 thoughts on “New Map Pictures”

    • that’s because you’re an idiot. Just adding SNOW to a map does NOTHING for the game play. Make tanks slide or loose traction on ice, have falling snow pile up and be able to use as temporary cover (taking shots reduce the snow pile) or have random guest of snow REDUCE visibility. Shit like that make maps different and challenging, not just adding snow which is nothign more then making the map WHITE

      • I like it why call me an idiot?

        if a person results to insults it means they lack an argument

      • “have falling snow pile up”

        Because 15 minutes of falling snow definitely make a snow pile big enough to cover a tank.

        Well, they could, but the snowfall would be so big that you’d have to bump the enemy to see it anyway.

      • It dies more than make the map white. It reduces the bush cover significantly. Now if they added snowbanks, they could change the cover points while remaining kind to snipers, passive scouts, ambushers and artillery.

      • By temporary cover, I really hope you mean visual.

        And the map is pretty, that’s, according to #pcmasterrace, one of the most important aspects of a game.

        And personally, I rather like maps to be nice to look at, and not just “I go here and kill things”. Aesthetics are a thing, and humans like them.

      • Don’t be a dick.
        The fact that you can’t see OTHER reasons that people might like a map (IE: aesthetics) makes YOU the simpleton. If you don’t see the benefit of a new version of a map, then you aren’t the target audience for it.

      • Wow, saxsan just said he likes the new map and that guy started insulting him. He didn’t even say “I like new innovations on ruinberg”, he just stated that he loves new look. Totally reason to insult and whine. I smell either a 13 yo kid or 16 being bully in school. Grow up SACEUR.

    • Hey, beim Challenger Avenger, hast du das Falsche Bild für die Kanonen Statistiken, da steht nur die des Achilles ;)

      Edit: Hat aber leicht andere Werte?

  6. Wow, I wish my laptop rendered that good. I would like to see a few more paths along the sides of the bowl in Mittengard. Is “Lost City” inspired by any particular place? It seems like it needs cacti, not deciduous trees.

  7. Hmm,
    Winter Ruinberg: looking better than R. On Fire..
    Lost City: thank god it’s only for E-sports.. it looks boring being symetrical..
    Mittengard: I have a feeling high view range tank sealclubbers will have a party on this map…

  8. Pingback: Fotografie z nových map

  9. Whats the deal with two bases on Lost City ? It doesnt look like standard “one base for each team”

      • Em ok but I still dont get it. Why one base is way closer to one team starting point while second base is far away from second team starting point (and basically between two starting points)

  10. Oh, they managed to make Ruinberg worse. There’s no room for lights or tanks that rely on camo at all anymore on that map now. Fuck this shit. Remove it already.

  14. Lost city: e-sports exclusive, couldn’t care less
    Mittengard: better province
    Ruinberg: snow is nicer than darkberg on fire, but it doesn’t change the fact that the north has an advantage when supporting the city from the field

  15. Omg! If that PIT map will really be that small, then I am gonna sealclub the shit out of my FCM 36 PAK 40!
    Round starts – instaspot all of the enemy team, bang – Scout and Patrol Duty in the pocket, and win in 2 minutes ;-D

  16. i dont get all the hate with Ruinburg On Fire. i liked the map. it added some contrast to all the “bright” maps. heck it was nice to have a different look on the same map. did it add something new? no and it didnt exactly need to. Ruinburg On Fire should have been left as it was and the time that went towards develping the winter version could have been better used working on maps that have actual problems like the town in Sacred Valley.