Thanks to xxviktor for noticing this.
Hello everyone,
in the early 9.5 vehicle changes post, I wrote that the screwed the T-34-85M model by shifting the turret, but not its mantlet – like this:
As a result, the mantlet was clipping into the left part of frontal turret armor and there was a (small, but noticeable) hole on the right side.
So, do you think they fixed it? Of course not. In 9.5:
Notice the yellow hole on the right side, not covered by the mantlet. And don’t forget to buy the T-34-85M bundle and remember: Wargaming quality assurance is one of the best in business!
PS: yes, it’s a small thing, but it’s about the principle – they could have checked, I even posted in on FTR. Especially when it comes to a tank sold for real life money.
“Best QA in gaming branch” or some other bullshit
http://i.imgur.com/p5IJNoH.jpg
:D
If you showed this to anyone that doesn’t read FTR they’d have no idea what you’re talking about, really.
It doesn’t matter SS.
Soviet got the most advanced armour in the world anyway – Stalin Spaced armour and SerB Active protection System.
And also , Merry Christmas!
Also Stalinium(tm) Guided Derp Shells(c)
Yo SS, wtf is wrong with the weight of the new British engines?
http://i.imgur.com/qqUvvbK.png
that cant be right lel
MS-1 has a competition :D
It seems to be correct though, those wright continental engines are all radial engines, while the chrysler one is basically 5 pre-existing chrysler engines smashed together to make one bigger engine(it was actually so big it needed an elongated hull on the M4A4 that used it), so it kind of makes sense for that engine to be a lot heavier.
wikipedia lists the radial engine at about 300kg: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wright_R-975#General_characteristics
this site mentions the chrysler engine weighs around 2400kg: http://www.autospeed.com/cms/article.html?&title=The-Chrysler-A57-MultiBank-Engine&A=112613
the Maus engine weights 750, and delivers 1750 hp.
the MS-1 engine weights 920, and delivers 70 hp.
Seems legit to me.
It is. That is multibank engine the size of half a jeep. Lol they are huge. To be fair they got 470 HP out of them though.
“Wargaming quality assurance is one of the best in business!”
It is. From a certain point of view at least. If you take all those developers who produce tons of different barely working “games” and expect to sell maybe a thousand copies of each into account, it’s not really that hard for WG to get in the top few percent. One-eyed among the blind, so to speak.
Well to bad for any who bought it they can’t alter premiums…..oh wait they can’t make them worse…..or ppl complain….watch them buff a prem and everyone be like this is why I bought it….
Turret makes unst unst unst unst :D
more like
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PmEvxswn4IY
Compare the visual and collision models. The shifted turret is wrong, not the gun mantlet.
i was thinking about this deal since a tank t6 for 10€ isnt all that bad of a deal but seeing this just makes me not want to spend even that much.. at least fucking try harder if you want our money FOR VIRTUAL tanks(that we dont even actually own).. its obvious what your real agenda is. make $ – fuck over customers and laugh- ho ho ho
Has anyone noticed the 200mm rear turret armor of the Challengers Avenger turret? I mean, that cannot be right. Can it?
Counter weight to the gun to keep the turret balanced (or to deal with recoil or something). Like T34 HT and M18 Hellcat top turret.
Aah ok, thanks.
But so far it’s the only disappointment in disappointment!
Pingback: Supertest: Další info o nových premiácích
This is always ridiculous. You`d think they could use say 10 million of there 1 billion dollars they made on game so far to stop contracting models and have there own artists….But nope they need 3rd party modlelers to blame for no HD content and model fuck ups.