A-43 – upcoming tier 6 medium


Hello everyone,

the A-43 (or T-34M, as it is also known) is the upcoming tier 6 medium tank in the World of Tanks 0.8.8 patch – so let’s have a look at him, shall we? First, official Wargaming tank description (that was leaked earlier):

Developed in 1941 at Plant No. 183 under the designation A-43. A new vehicle was intended to replace the T-34 tank. The vehicle was to be equipped with torsion-bar suspension, diesel engine V-5, a new transmission and a reinforced to 60 mm front armor.


As the name “T-34M” (and the general shapes of the vehicle) might suggest, the story of this tank prototype starts with the original T-34 Soviet medium tank.

The thing was, for all its advantages, it had a number of serious flaws. One of them was the vertical spring suspension, that had trouble coping with the 30 ton vehicle (let alone later even heavier models). Torsion bars would have been a much better solution – a thing the Soviets themselves did realize, they however also realized that such a conversion would require massive hull re-work.
Nevertheless, the order to convert the T-34 to torsion bars suspension was given in October 1940 – the vehicle recieved the designation “T-34T“.

The initial idea was that the torsion bar suspension would be adjustable and usable even for already produced vehicles, but that hope was not fulfilled, the hull simply couldn’t have been easily adapted. That’s why another decision was taken: to create a completely new medium tank with torsion bar suspension, which would share only some parts with the T-34. The project was redesignated “A-43” and the development was to take place in the Plant No.183 in Kharkov.

It is also suspected that when designing the A-43, the developers had a close look at the Panzer III and simply implemented some of the German solutions in it. Specifically, the A-43 was designed to have some reserves, so it could be modernized in time. Mobility also played an important part. However, the A-43 was an original design and by no means a copy of either Panzer III or T-34.

The design works on the A-43 began in January 1941. The vehicle was longer and higher, but narrower than the T-34 and its clearance was improved by 5cm. A new variant of the V-5 diesel engine was specifically developed for the A-43, with increased horsepower (600hp) and increased capacity of fuel tanks. The transmission remained the same (4-speed), but it was supposed to have a reduction, so the handling of the tank would improve. As a result, the A-43 had 8 gears for forward driving and 2 reverse gears.

The suspension was also changed a lot – instead of 5 big roadweels, 6 smaller doubled roadwheels were used, each with individual torsion bar suspension. The track width was also changed – in fact, the A-43 tracks are narrower (450mm), resulting in somewhat bigger vehicle ground pressure.

The interior was also changed (compared to the T-34). The driver was moved to the right side of the hull and the radioman/machinegunner to the left. The A-43 was supposed to be equipped with a new 3-man turret (1700mm turret ring diameter), equipped with the commander’s cupola.

The weapons of the vehicle wouldn’t change from the T-34 though, the tank was to be equipped with the 76,2mm F-34 gun (I assume we’ll see that as the stock version). The only additional armament was the addition of the portable PPD machinegun to the interior. It’s an interesting fact though that the designers apparently counted on the fact that there would be a flamethrower version eventually developed, because they did consider the installation of a flamethrower instead of the frontal machinegun.

Despite all these improvements, the vehicle was actually one ton lighter than the T-34 and its maximum speed was estimated to be 52-55km/h.

The preliminary project of the A-43 (at that point, it was still called T-34T) was presented to the committee for mock-ups in January 1941. The project was accepted warmly – in fact, it was liked very, very much. There were only two demands: one was to increase the frontal armor to 60mm and another was a different (planet) transmission. These demands were met and in February 1941, the project was officially approved by the People’s Commissariat of Tank Industry (NKPT). However, more demands (aimed at simplifying the production of the vehicle) were brought up soon after. One of them was to reduce the curves of the vehicle (in favour of sharp angles) and to replace the old welded turret either with a new welded turret (that was simplier to manufacture), or with a cast turret (designed by V.Buslov), that had 52-50mm thick sides and a hatch in commander’s cupola. These demands were also met.

In March 1941, the tank was officially renamed to T-34M and the construction of two prototypes was initiated (later increased to the initial batch of 6 vehicles). In the meanwhile, it’s worth noting that the Soviets also ran an experiment, where they (somewhat crudely) converted one T-34 mod.1940 to torsion bar suspension. This experimental vehicle, called T-34T (once again) performed about the same as the regular T-34, but the ride was smoother.

In the meanwhile, through April and May 1941, various parts of the prototypes were completed, including several new suspensions in one factory and the new pressed-welded armor turret in another (5 pieces were prepared). Three partially finished hulls were also prepared by that time.

Despite all the efforts however, the plan to create at least one functional prototype until the evacuation had failed. The main reason was the trouble with the new V-5 engine – mating it with new transmission (as requested earlier) took time and while it was supposed to be done by May 1st 1941, the Plant No.183, responsible for the conversion, pushed the date to 25th of July.

And so, by the time the Germans invaded, none of the six vehicles reached at least the state of 70 percent completion. According to some sources, some parts were evecuated with the rest of the plant (turrets and some hulls, but no transmissions or engines) to Nizhny Tagil, but the development and production could not continue: the army demanded mass production of inferior, but readily available T-34 tanks and there was no capacity left for the T-34M project – and that was the end of it.
It is not officially known, what became of the parts that were evacuated, but some sources state that the turrets and perhaps even the hulls were used as parts for the regular T-34 construction. Other sources claim they were scrapped.


Since the T-34M will be directly competing with the T-34/85, we will compare the two vehicles. The following table will take the ingame values of the T-34/85 and compare them to the historical T-34M. The T-34/85 values will be in brackets.

Weight: 24 tons (31,7)
Hull Armor: 60/45/45? (45,45,40)
Turret Armor: ??? (hard to say, but I’d wager the T-34M turred will be less armored than the T-34/85 one)
Engine: 600hp V-5 (500-600hp engines)
Speed: up to 60km/h – or 55 from other sources (54 km/h)
Gun: 76,2mm F-34 (but here I expect both tanks to have roughly similiar weaponry)


I guess we can expect the T-34M to have better viewrange and better accuracy when moving (smoother suspension). Thanks to its lower weight, it will probably also be more mobile. The armament will apparently stay the same, but the T-34M might not recieve the T-34/85′s top gun as a mobility tradeoff. Overall, it should be quite a nice and mobile vehicle to play with.



Ensign Expendable’s notes on T-34M

42 thoughts on “A-43 – upcoming tier 6 medium

  1. Looks like a fun tank, think I’ll re-buy my T-34 and start saving XP for it.

  2. so is this tank going to be coming in with the supposed 2nd soviet medium line or what?

      • Well, not everyone: Merkava still hasn’t got torsion bars. And everyone now moves towards hydrogas :P …

      • The Brits for example never went for torsion bars for whatever reason, but the fact that pretty much everybody else and then some did (and still tend to) suggests there are sound reasons for the popularity.

    • A) torsion bars are generally more effective
      B) less internal hull volume wasted
      C) the crew won’t feel like they’re inside a badly made percussion insrument as much

      …just off the top of my head. Those who have delved into the technicals more deeply can doubtless add a handful or a few.

  3. that gun on leakscreen is quite long, longer than F-34, i hope its better than it..

      • Seeing the stats it looks similar to 7,5 cm KwK 40 L/48. It’s going to be rather underpowered even for tier 5. If the tank ends up on tier 6 it’s going to require a lot more skill to drive than it’s counterparts from other tech trees.

  4. To me I find the placement, if it is correct at tier 6, rather odd to be honest. It seems to fit tier 5 better, besides the T-34 in the tech tree and connected to the A-20 for instance.

    • Medium with 60 mm of slopped armor on the front? Tier 5 ???? LOL noob! This is a clear tier 6, at tier 5 it would be absolutely overpowered with good 76 mm gun. The PzIV and M4 would not have a chance.

        • Those were the days…
          Though it had a 50mm turret back then.
          Then they reduced the hull to 60mm, but buffed the turret to 80mm

          ..then they re-nerfed the turret back down to 50mm.

          The only benefit we got left is that the PZIII/IV moves really fast. Back when it had 80mm of armor it had a really strange speed cap.

  5. Well for now the Cromwell is hands down the best Tier 6 overall. Lets see what this thingie can do.

    • Nope! This thing has no gun depression and 60mm of sloped armor is really nothing but weight.

    • Ok, so what your saying is that the cromwelly, is better then the kv-1s top gun….. kv-1s can two shot the cromwell.

  6. Looks like a T-50/T-50-2 on steroids.

    I’m more interested in tier 9 on the second medium branch.

  7. You know… aside from armor I don’t see this thing being any better than the Type 58.

  8. Pingback: A-44 – possible tier 7 Soviet medium in 8.9 | For The Record

  9. Pingback: A-44 – possible tier 7 Soviet medium in 8.8 | XVM战绩插件中文化团队

  10. Pingback: What will be the 8.8 Soviet medium branch T9? | For The Record

  11. This tank was a victim of the “Iron Law” of mobilization for war: you build what you have. Constantly trying to out-tech the other side yields designs with teething issues, delayed introduction and less numbers, or in the case of the Panther, all 3.

    Germany could only prosecute the war in the East more successfully with more panzers, historically this limits them to the Panzer IV. They didn’t respect the Iron Law though and lost WWII badly because of it.