- Russian support service confirms that HT15 mission is bugged (one of the elements of the equation apparently does not count)
- Storm confirms that the AMX-50B in HD doesn’t have the green weakzones on frontal plate (the armor models that were leaked earlier were incorrect)
- HT11 mission is also bugged – it will not complete even if your tracks are damaged, it will be fixed
- the same bug as above applies for other missions as well, such as TD2
- MT12 description is incorrect, in it you personally have to kill 3 vehicles, not the entire platoon
- new premium tanks will be implemented “in near future”
- awarding the girl tankers and tokens needed for StuG IV (specifically, for SPG mission branch) is bugged, WG is working on it
- if you set an enemy on fire and get killed immediately after, the fire damage does count towards your reward even after you die
- there are some mods (SS: obsolete XVM?) that make your client show incorrect IM parameters (they make you see the conditions from 9.5 test, not the final ones), be sure you have the mods updated or remove them
- platoons in IM’s a bad idea? “Those are the conditions in the missions. It’s your right to complete them – or not. And yes – EVERY player has the possibility to play in a platoon”
- in order for the girl crew special perk to activate, the crew has to consist entirely of women
- IM vehicles do NOT have increased profitability, they are not premium tanks, but reward tanks
- Storm confirms that the AMX-50B in HD doesn’t have the green weakzones on frontal plate (the armor models that were leaked earlier were incorrect)
so i still can ram with my beautiful 50b?
AFAIK ramming dmg is calc’d from the nominal armor value so there’d be no change in ramming whatsoever.
Ramming damage depends on armor value in the ramming point. They said this will be changed though.
It caused bugs so its back to one value per side.
Very AWful.
No matter, its fixed.. so yay
- platoons in IM’s a bad idea? “Those are the conditions in the missions. It’s your right to complete them – or not. And yes – EVERY player has the possibility to play in a platoon”
Yeah except I am forced to do so. What if my friends don’t like War MMO stuff? Find a random guy in chat? No thanks. The devs should really consider the players like that think. Solo players are a big community in this game and they should………
Oh wait. Why bother if I can play AW :)
[AW intensifies]
Even without AW, WOT is in trouble. You can only milk the cow for so long…..
^True.
They ran out of content to keep me playing. Surely, not only me.
WG does things slowly or not at all when its needed.
Basically the only 2 things that would, maybe, get me hyped for crazy hours playing WoT is:
-japanese heavies/TDs
-havok+new motion physics..
Other than that, meh, :P
+1
Return of French Heavys?
Great rebalance of gold ammo prices and penetration values?
Reconsidering arty role to make it more support eg. large area track, large area constant splash damage (like airburst), crew concussion, concealing smoke, less super long range damage dealer only (we have enough of these)?
Basically AW :D
AW looks very promising, but it’s not the holy grail. You’re over hyping it and in the end, will expect too much, to your own detriment.
Could be. But its CryEngine and Obsidian – how many times they would be faster to add or change stuff?
Yup, not just you. I tried playing yesterday for the first time in ages. Gave up after a few games. Trying to incentivize people to play a game with ‘rewards’, without actually bothering to improve the game itself is a waste of time.
Again, very true Sense
Oh my goodness, never thought I’d agree with Woras, how low have I fallen.
YES, WG does no longer provide a content I would want to play.
No new tanks, only some bugged uninspired shit.
We should thanks WG for uniting us, players in this matter ;D
Well I must agree with Woras here. :O
WG always makes the worst possible decision in the end. Like with the FV 4202 change…
removing kv5s removing types, removing tanks. making op tanks as prems.. pz2j su-76i, selling tanks that require 100$+
and the t-50-2 saying it was made to be a prem then removed it..
Screw you ! Warframe all the way !
Ugh, need to farm more neurals and cells :D Add me.
Oh wait. Why bother if you don’t have to play the missions.
Well, because we want something new and apparently WG spent half of year on these IM while they could develop something more interesting. We naturally try them out and see that WG disappointed us.
BUY BEER
AW should release an advertising video in the spirit of the old WoT ads that mocked Eve Online and fantasy games.
Some WW2 tanks are battling away (in a corridor, of course) when a Leo 2 and T-90 arrive and murder both teams before they can figure out what’s going on. When the killing is done, the Leo and T-90 traverse their turrets toward each other, depress their guns to “nod” at one another, then drive off into the sunset. As they leave, the turret blows off a burning IS-7.
That would be ultimate mockery :D Dont think they wont do – mail.ru is probably pissed at WG :)
“Find a random guy in chat? No thanks.”
Why? It’s a few battles only.
It just strengthens the stereotype that gamers are anti-social.
Social phobia is strong in this one…
To sum up :
-bug
-bug
-bug
-bug
-bug
-bug
Kinda sums up WOT in general
well,, that WG in nutshells,, new patch mean new bug,, and new bug mean new problem,, and if they don;t fix it ASAP,, then the player will hate you,, the cow that usually they milk start to hate you,, oh wait,, that same thing,, okay,, change it,, the IGN will hate you,, and if everyone hate you,, you won’t get any money,, well,, they never care about their player anymore,, since they prefer to smoke rocket fuel and use it to send SerB to their new base on the moon
BEST QUALITY ASSURANCE IN THE INDUSTRY (TM)
We love you too Storm :*
@ExoNut – makes you wonder how bad the rest of the industry is.
Another fail on Wargamings part…
So the leaked HD armor of the AMX-50b, showing to have over 200mm of frontal armor now is correct? O.o
AMX 50B Upper frontal plate is ALREADY insanely strong.
Do not shoot it.
I never do xD
lol front armor on amx 50b is pure retarded, on test server noob tds kept shooting it on my amx and bouncing. while i murdered them one by one
The 50B as already the best frontal hull armor in the game.
So once again World of Screwups can’t even create a new part of the game without screwing it up so badly that it is unplayable!!!
Tell Serb B to stop playing rocket man, fire storm and fix this mess, because he’s not getting anymore money from me!!!
God I hope some of the new games come out soon!!!
Serb B feat. Fire Storm – BugWorld :D
Which one is Do The Flop Guy?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5inD4XWz4U
Unplayable? Please give me your definition of that word?
WoT in a nutshell
http://www.chuckchat.com/technorama/files/2011/02/bug-free.gif
What if you have mixed crew,can you get BIA if you cant SOS(sex on steel) perk?
nope
Not sure if i just have a bad memory or there is a bug with the the 2nd 9.5 patch (to bring the IMs). It seems that the gun traverse of the amx 13 f3 has changed. The total amount of traverse is the same but it is now shifted upwards of 5 degrees or more to the right of center or more.
It was always like this and it’s correct
Ok good to know. Just seems like it was different before
- in order for the girl crew special perk to activate, the crew has to consist entirely of women
Well, fuck you too WG
As if this whole “women as reward” wasn’t sexist and dumb enough.
How is it discriminating against women?
mimimi you can win women as a reward mimimi, but you can also get endless amounts of men for free :P
“- Russian support service confirms that HT15 mission is bugged (one of the elements of the equation apparently does not count)”
Do we know which one? Is it damage dealt or damage blocked that isn’t being counted?
I think it is damage received which is currently not counted.
“- MT12 description is incorrect, in it you personally have to kill 3 vehicles, not the entire platoon”
I’m confused here. So i have to kill 3 tanks while i’m in a platoon ?
Does that mean to achieve MT12 mission for Obj 260 i have to kill 10 tanks by myself while i’m in a platoon ? WTF that’s a pool medal. So what is the purpose of forming a platoon here ?
How the hell are you supposed to bounce 8000 damage in a heavy tank for one battle? Or Am I misunderstanding that mission..
Blocked…..
Potential damage received was best – but NOOOOOO, fuck shit up while it works excellent.
Also Storm’s a twat – tanking with tracks, according to him, is bullshit…
that 8000 is total of damage you dealt + damage you received + damage your armour blocked. For example 4000 + 2000 + 2000. But this mission is current bugged which mean damage received or blocked doesn’t count. At the moment you have to deal for example 6000 + 2000 received (or blocked).
Its doable in tier 10 german
It’s bounced + tanked + dealt, IIRC.
- MT12 description is incorrect, in it you personally have to kill 3 vehicles, not the entire platoon
this is bullshit, if this is how it should work you would need 10 kills yourself in the object 260 MT12
-IM tanks are not premium tanks
-NA launcher specifically calls them “Premium Tanks”
Trololo
I noticed the same thing
“- there are some mods (SS: obsolete XVM?) that make your client show incorrect IM parameters (they make you see the conditions from 9.5 test, not the final ones), be sure you have the mods updated or remove them”
XVM made the popups display text instead of just a blank window, but I had to update my stat tracking mod (yasenkrasen, in this case, but I imagine others are similar) to update the IM text as well as the completion window text.
So let me get this straight… its now confirmed that there are some bugs in IMs, and some of those will not complete no matter what, and several of them are the same bug across several vehicle class….
… so how is it possible WG stated that some people have already completed the missions and got the Stug IV? Sounds a bit suspicious to me!
Yeah was wondering that myself.
Appy
“some of those will not complete no matter what”
That’s not true. Most of them have bugged descriptions, some of them are little bugged in themselves, but all are still completable (even though some not in a way you’d expect from description)
Here is a fun little bug, HT-7 cap base, if you cap the base and the team then kills everyone it doesn’t count!
I am unsure about one thing – did they tell us, that if you don’t want to complete all 5 classes, you need to complete ALL secondary objectives for four classes to receive one extra “point” (whatever it is called in english)? Currently, it is enough to fullfill the secondary objective only for last mission in chain, to get that one extra “point”.
http://imgur.com/zaNjZQu
That’s enough officially (was written on the site PMs description)
Then I must have read something bad. Ok, thanks.
Usually I’m all for dumping on WG but these comments are a bit too salty, even for me.
- in order for the girl crew special perk to activate, the crew has to consist entirely of women
You keep saying that, and yet:
Female Commander
http://i.imgur.com/JqKmdkP.jpg
Male Commander
http://i.imgur.com/9jx8czm.jpg
They have the exact same reload time, BIA on the Male crew members is active with a Female commander.
I have played the bat extensively in pub games over the last couple days, and it is working.
Well it is proven many times that WG does not even know their own game. :D
platoons in IM’s a bad idea
HORRIBLE idea actually!!! what if i don’t have anyone to platoon with because the people i know aren’t into WOT at all!?!? why can’t i just participate and compete in wining the STUG IV without depending on someone else !?! i simply want to play this game single player style and from time to time as a thank you for wasting so many hours get a freaking virtual tank in return for ************ sake!!!! what the hell is wrong with you people?!? i simply hate platooning because people in random platoons aren’t even taking the game seriously. it’s just another pathetic excuse to make unicums have an easy life with their unicum friends, honestly. individual should stay individual as in 1 player missions. you really should have an option to complete the mission alone on your own!!! or at least skip those missions by completing 2-3 other individual missions, truly individual not communist individual.
“Communist individual” that made my day lol
the MT-12 mission is bugged i think,i completed it with my friend,at first i played Type 59 and always got 2 kills and he was playing Lowe,always getting 1 or 2 kills,after some matches we played T62A both of us,and i managed to kill 2 enemies and he other 2 and my mission was completed
- MT12 description is incorrect, in it you personally have to kill 3 vehicles, not the entire platoon
meaning in order to do the MT12 for Object 260 you have to kill 10 tanks yourself while being in a platoon
- platoons in IM’s a bad idea? “Those are the conditions in the missions. It’s your right to complete them – or not. And yes – EVERY player has the possibility to play in a platoon”
Ahh, remeber when you could only form a platoon with premium account? Bad old times…
3 man platoon*
You must be new here :P
Obv, when you call something INDIVIDUAL missions, you have to put there platooning. Of course.
HT11 is also bugged in a different way. It gets awarded even if you are destroyed during the battle.
- IM vehicles do NOT have increased profitability, they are not premium tanks, but reward tanks
So does that mean no XP bonus as well to train crew from other vehicles ? and you also have to train a specific crew for this “premium non-premium reward BS vehicle” ?
Reward tank = premium in everything except increased profitability.
No. You dont get premium xp or credit bonus. But you get the ability to put a crew from the same nation and class in without penalty
IN the last 2 months, I’ve logged in to WOT about 3 or 4 times, and each time I’ve logged back out without playing a single game…
Couldn’t be arsed… there are so many fuckups in this game that every day its more unplayable…
If anyone sees me in battle.. give me a slap and tell me to wake up…. thanks…
Pingback: World of Tanks news 17 01 2015