The popularity of World of Tanks is greatly helping to spread interest in tank history, however some of the inaccuracies in the game are starting to create a new strain of internet tank myths.
One of those is about the VK 45.02 (P), Porsche’s failed bid for a Tiger successor, represented in WOT by two tanks that are both way above their historical counterpart, especially what they call the “Ausf B”.
Today we will use Special Panzer Variants by Spielberger, Panzer Tracts 20-1, Kingtiger Heavy Tank and Germany’s Tiger tanks – VK 45-02 to Tiger II by Jentz & Doyle.
The roots of a Porsche Tiger improvement starts in early 1942, with the very first proposal of a “Typ 101 Verstaerkt” (strengthened), soon changed into Typ 180 (Electric transmission) and 181 (Hydraulic), designated by Wa Pruef 6 as VK 45.01 (P2), VK 45.02 (P) and finally Tiger P2.
On 30 January 1942 Dr. Porsche proposed that the Tiger P chassis from N° 101 onwards were to be produced with armor sloped at 60° from vertical, with Krupp reply in early February asking for the sloping to be reduced at 55° to ease manufacture, compatibility with frontal machine gun mounts and a large enough turret ring.
It was to be powered by twin Porsche Typ 101/3 engines, rated at 300 HP each (for a total of 600 HP), with a planned maximum speed of 35 kilometers per hour for the 65 tonnes panzer.
Several upgrade proposals were made in October 1942, installing either twin Porsche Deutz Typ 180/1 generating a total 740 HP, a single Porsche Type 180/2 700 HP engine and even a rear layout configuration:
Armor was set to be 80mm sloped at 55° from vertical frontally, 80mm sloped from 0 to 15° in the sides and 80mm vertical in the rear.
A new turret was designed initially to house the 88mm Flak 41 under Hitler’s strict request , which was later on switched to the 88mm KWK 43 used in the Henschel Tiger II, with specifications for it to be to turn at 15 degrees per second under electric power.
in 2nd paragraph you write VK 54.02 (P) instead of 45:)
Nice article BTW
Fixed, thanks :)
Also it says November 1492 at the bottom xD.
Yes, Wa Pruef 6 hated it so much that they planned for centuries its refusal :P
I wonder if WG while nerf the armor to historical when they’re hd remodeled like all the curret hd models. Oh man that would make them even worse they they already are x.x.
Hopefully they will make it a tier 8 tank……
Drop them one tier down and the issue would be solved.
VK 4502 A Is an AWESOME tank!
Ausf. B though… I agree. It is not bad, just that OP E-75 is better
I do like the vk 4502 A only when its a teir 8 or lower game if its teir 9/10 i wish i was in a tiger 2. And yea vk 4502 B is decent but why would u drive it over a E75. xD
I like it in every single way :)
Even in a tier 8 game it can pwn. One of my few 200+ battle tanks with 60+ win ratio (I am a solo player :P, so its good)
Three words- rear.mounted.turret. The vkB reigns supreme as far as sidescrapping goes. Granted, it’s a lot more sluggish than the OP-75, but it’s nothing you can’t fix with some intelligent gameplay.
Now the vkA, that one was dreadfully not my playstyle…
WG said a while back that they’ll combine everything VK 45.01 related and have them as optional hulls.
Hmmm
One of these with the historical armour on tier 7, and one with the upgraded suspension and 130mm armour on tier 8 :)
Will have to fit Tiger P though. Tier 9, why not that Maus-like thing I saw here as a tier 9 alternative :)
Maybe it can be like the KV-1S [T6] -> KV-13 [T7] -> T-43 [T7] -> T-44 [T8] progression that’s on the Russian tree.
VK 30.01P [T6] -> Tiger (P) [T7] -> VK 45.02A [T7] -> VK 45.02B [T8]
What’s after the 4502B though?
I’ve read on FTR a few times that they could add the maus prototype or something like that.
http://ftr-wot.blogspot.cz/2013/04/this-is-how-maus-started.html
http://ftr-wot.blogspot.cz/2013/04/porsche-unleashed.html
http://ftr-wot.blogspot.cz/2013/04/porsche-unleashed-typ-205a-mauschen.html
Found these after my edit expired D:.
Not sure of their stats but i assume one of them could be fine at teir 9.
With alternate hulls I’d say they could have the A and B as different options so:
VK30.01P (T6) >> Tiger P (T7) >> VK45.02 [Stock: A, Optional Hull B] (T8) >> Maus Prototype (T9) >> Maus (T10)
While the 45.02A would still not quite be historical it would make sense for gameplay and avoid the 1 off sidebranch like the Ferdi.
VkA > KT
For me, at least :D
And VkB is a fortress.
This man knows the business.
Hunting packs of Type 59′s in your VKA is a beautiful experience. It’s unique gameplay is rewarding as hell
For me it has no advantages over kt. turret turns slower,armour, dpm, pen and gun depression are worse, only accelerates a bit faster. Panther 2 at least is nimbler and a bit smaller, but still mediocre. Indien and ferdi are best german 8 tiers
I played both :)
Trust me, it has better gun soft stats, better DPM and hunts medium tanks better :)
KT=Awesome
VK A= Awesome + 0,1
Ferdi= Awesome
Panther 2= Awesome
JagdPanther 2= Awesome
Indien= No played it yet, probably awesome as well :D
OP RHEINMETAL THING= Awesome!
For a 900hp Diesel Air Cooled engine there is only the
Type 212 Porsche
150mm X 170mm X-16 48L
Weight: 2500 kg 1500hp
Air-Cooled Diesel Fuel Injected Turbocharged.
Although it would need to be detuned in power or be an early development of that engine. It is also possible that it was a development of the Type 203(Type 180/2) which developed 780hp turbocharged and it is possible that it could have been boosted further.
Argus have a few 800 hp designs but I have not found any hard details on them.
Sorry meant 720/760hp for the (X-16) Type 203(Type 180/2) and for the Type 203 (X-18) it is 780hp. Porsche reused the Type 203 name for god knows why…
Why did they order 70 more turrets then hulls? Had they already decided to use them on the Henschel Tiger 2 hulls, or where they just being optimistic about future Porsche hull orders?
optimistic, but originally there was the order for 200 hulls.
I’m not sure about uparmoring the front or installing a larger gun would be just a matter of suspension weight limits. Tank balance plays a large role into the tank’s characteristics and the lopsided load on the front roadwheels could be too much for the suspension to handle
105mm L/52 is actually shorter than KWK 43, although you’re right about balance, a problem already present in the up-armored Tiger P which had to point the turret backwards when crossing difficult terrain, and that was with the short 88.
Most tanks turn the turret when crossing difficult terrain…
Depends on the conditions. In locations where it’s possible to have contact with the enemy, the gunner just elevates the gun when crossing difficult terrain. During transit in peaceful times, there’s no need to have the gun at the ready so it’s traversed to the rear and usually the barrel is secured to the hull to prevent it from oscillating and stressing the turret-ring/elevation mechanisms
Pingback: Tiger Tales: The VK 45.02 P1 and P2 – the engines | For The Record