From Amway921′s “visit to Wargaming” video. These are apparently – according to VK Leaks community – the HD models that are being worked on right now. The ISU-152 is clear, the rest… not so much.
72 thoughts on “Upcoming HD Models”
I see IS-7, T-62A, M40/M43 or M12, IS-4 and T-44
I see ST-I far back on the left.. I don’t think that’s M103 just because M103 is 4th in the middle row.. just after that arty
btw that near ST-I looks like T25 AT
That’s an M103 without its suspension displayed. It has the same muzzle brake as a stock M103 and the same little bulge on the left-rear of the turret. Next to it is the Hellcat without suspension and beyond that is a Sherman. I think that entire line is the first patch of HD tanks.
I doubt that’s a M103 at all. M103 is already HD, it could be the T110E5?
Looking at how the turret slops up on the bottom back and how big the turret is, that is definitely an M103, in front of in (next to the ST-1) is a Jackson, then next to that appears to be a tortoise or AT15 from the sloping of the engine deck.
that’s never a ST-1, it could be the M6 alien.
Im going off what they said earlier, but looking at it know, could an ST1 or the mutant M6
To me it looks like an M6A2E1 they are really long and tall.
The Mutant6 doesn’t have ears, but it looks like it does in this photo.
at it now, it could be a*
might not be ears could be the loaders shell hatch on the turret side.
I can recognise IS-7, IS, T-62A, T-44 (?) and then perhaps M48 in the distance (or T54) , M40/M43 too. And on the first pic there could be a Tiger II or the Panther.
Nice flying turret in the second image tho
Thats generally what your toolkit looks like when working with meshes, random models half textured or missing maps lying around as you mess with them to get them working in-engine.
They said that there are several people working on one HD model, like one for turret and suspension, one for front hull and side hull etc… They make HD models in several parts and they left the seperate turret there, for some reasons
When working in 3D modelling you can switch between perspective projection and orthographic. That’s probably what’s happening there, though to be fair i don’t doubt that there might be some model changes.
Yup, I think it’s orthographic – look at the ISU in the top right corner, the 152mm looks all out of whack because of the way it’s displayed.
It’s not ortho, it’s just a very uncomfortable narrow FOV camera. If it was ortho, you wouldn’t have the further tanks looking smaller, and you’d have the front and real of the is-7 actually parallel on the picture.
Looks like IS, T-62A, IS-7, T-44, T54E1, IS-4, M12, ISU-152, something Panther-based in the first pic – probably Jagdpanther.
Oh looks like the Machinegunnus Giganticus on IS-7 is folded. Thats cool! I don’t like that machine gun, the tank look silly with it so I’m using a “without machinegun” IS-7 skin.
That Machinegunnus giganticus is 14.5mm KPVT, so it was huge :) It could be used from the inside of the tank when unfolded.
Now I’ll have a reason to play my IS-7.
Yep, beautiful isnt it? Cant wait til IS-7 model is completed!
there shuld be T69
I wonder if the Object 268 will be correctly remodeled or horribly buffed in comparison with the reality (as currently) …
It might be. They mostly change armor values when reworked in HD. But if the changes make it unbalanced, they’re gonna keep it like old…
buffed? what?
Correct me if I’m wrong, but the real life model has worse angles than the in-game model am I right? IRL the obj.268 is taller, the pike-nose due to the angles is worse…
I think the HD remodel of the obj.268 would mean further nerfs, thus WG should buff some of its stats, even just soft stats, or i dunno…
Looks ugly and useless.
Fingers crossed for IS-7! so far i think almost every HD model got it’s armor nerfed.
Since it is already brutally nerfed compared to its historical state I don’t think it can get much worse than it already is.
Ah you’re right. i’ve forgot about that.
because we need more german and soviet tanks in HD first, amrite?
Well they are the most played nations
tbh, i think it is because they shove those 2 nations down our throat
I agree
Take a look at STB-1, now at IS-7 or SU/ISU-152…Tell me, which one is newer…WG admits that newer models have higher details (higher polygon or smthing, im not an expert of this), but even casuals can see the difference.
Add to this the fact that germans, soviets and the US are the most played nations. (Though there is no french HD model so far, but 3 UK, and French tanks are a BIT more popular than UK vehicles…)
I am not surprised that tanks of the nations you mentioned are being prioritized after all… :/
To be honest, if WG are aiming to make the game look better, doesn’t that mean making HD skins for the older tanks, with the least polygons (first tanks to be implemented in the game) first would be why they are choosing this order? Especially ones that are most played.
No hd premiums? :D
Can’t wait to see church 3 and matilda 4 in HD
Yeah why aren’t all churchills remade right now? I mean the Churchill I and III share the same front hull and turret, III has the skirts that can be used on the church VII etc… you can make 3 tanks for the cost of like 3 models.
Looks like a Type 59 in the middle row of the second image.
type 59 as they said its keeping is armor values xD its not getting nerfed ever.
you would think they would do something like the T29 first. 3 tanks for the price of one. (T29, T30, T34)
2nd pic. Top, right row. Im 99% sure thats a t110e5
It indeed looks like E5, I am only concerned about the mudguard on the front, because that is not how E5 mudguard looks like. What do you think, they might have modified it?
Well, the E5 in real life had a totally different hull. It looked more like an enlarged T69 hull, with a straight sloped front, not egg-shaped like the M103. What’s in game right now is some weird blend of the M48 and T54 hulls. I’m betting they corrected it now though. And now that I think about it, the sliver of the turret does look more like an E5 than anything else.
Because “never made” is a very ambiguous phrase. “In real life” obviously means what was made in real life and is what I was referring to. “Never made” =/= not designed.
The E5 “in real life” had a flat-sloped frontal plate like the T69 and a raised engine deck like the E3 and E4 have in Tanks. Completely unlike the M48/T54 hull it has in Tanks. But I guess Hunnicutt was just lying.
its an IS-7 see the pike nose?
Double M103? One looks like it has no track the other it does..weird
Brace yourselves; a nerf of T-62A is coming.
Yea it’s turret will probably become layered.
type 59 wont be i sence a type 59 whine about how op that armor value will be the same godly armor it always has ;p
The ISU-152 looks completely wrong. Has to be the worst model of a tank I have ever seen.
First Image:
Tiger II or E50/75
IS-7 (of course)
KV-85
T-62A
T-44
Second Image:
Back Row
KV-85
T-62A
T-44-122
T110E5 more than likely
:::Middle Row:::
Type 59
IS-4
M12
M103
:::Front Row:::
ST-1
M4A3E8 or T37
Tortoise
First image is probably a panther II, could be a Pz V/IV.
Could be the Panther II.
Panther II, Tiger II, E50,and E75 all have little loops extending from the rear of the hull sides for towing, this picture doesn’t have that. Only Panther I-based tanks lack those loops, and the only Panther-based tank that currently has spare track links on the rear like that is the Jagdpanther.
Other possibility is that this is the new upcoming premium Panther F.
Seeing as how there is only 1 example of a Panther II hull and 0 examples of the E50 and E75 I think you could guess that it could be them. However, there are plenty of tanks in the line ups that are already HD in the game so it could be the Panther. There’s just too little of the tank shown to know what it is. I could see it being the Jagdpanther as well based on the spare track links.
That’s an IS, not a KV-85
Either way the KV-85 is supposed to be HD in 9.3.
That’d be a WZ131/132/Type 62, not Type 59. Way too narrow hull.
type wont get a hd model because they dont want a whine of type 59 drivers.
I see IS-7, T-62A, M40/M43 or M12, IS-4 and T-44
I see ST-I far back on the left.. I don’t think that’s M103 just because M103 is 4th in the middle row.. just after that arty
btw that near ST-I looks like T25 AT
That’s an M103 without its suspension displayed. It has the same muzzle brake as a stock M103 and the same little bulge on the left-rear of the turret. Next to it is the Hellcat without suspension and beyond that is a Sherman. I think that entire line is the first patch of HD tanks.
I doubt that’s a M103 at all. M103 is already HD, it could be the T110E5?
Looking at how the turret slops up on the bottom back and how big the turret is, that is definitely an M103, in front of in (next to the ST-1) is a Jackson, then next to that appears to be a tortoise or AT15 from the sloping of the engine deck.
that’s never a ST-1, it could be the M6 alien.
Im going off what they said earlier, but looking at it know, could an ST1 or the mutant M6
To me it looks like an M6A2E1 they are really long and tall.
The Mutant6 doesn’t have ears, but it looks like it does in this photo.
at it now, it could be a*
might not be ears could be the loaders shell hatch on the turret side.
I can recognise IS-7, IS, T-62A, T-44 (?) and then perhaps M48 in the distance (or T54) , M40/M43 too. And on the first pic there could be a Tiger II or the Panther.
Nice flying turret in the second image tho
Thats generally what your toolkit looks like when working with meshes, random models half textured or missing maps lying around as you mess with them to get them working in-engine.
They said that there are several people working on one HD model, like one for turret and suspension, one for front hull and side hull etc… They make HD models in several parts and they left the seperate turret there, for some reasons
Obj 140, M40, T-44, IS-7, IS-4, Tiger-II probably
2nd pic top left
dafuq is that?
ST-1 mutant 6?
M103 without suspension displayed.
M6A2E1
Is it me, or did the IS-7 get squished?
Might be a perspective thing. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orthographic_projection
When working in 3D modelling you can switch between perspective projection and orthographic. That’s probably what’s happening there, though to be fair i don’t doubt that there might be some model changes.
Yup, I think it’s orthographic – look at the ISU in the top right corner, the 152mm looks all out of whack because of the way it’s displayed.
It’s not ortho, it’s just a very uncomfortable narrow FOV camera. If it was ortho, you wouldn’t have the further tanks looking smaller, and you’d have the front and real of the is-7 actually parallel on the picture.
Looks like IS, T-62A, IS-7, T-44, T54E1, IS-4, M12, ISU-152, something Panther-based in the first pic – probably Jagdpanther.
Oh looks like the Machinegunnus Giganticus on IS-7 is folded. Thats cool! I don’t like that machine gun, the tank look silly with it so I’m using a “without machinegun” IS-7 skin.
That Machinegunnus giganticus is 14.5mm KPVT, so it was huge :) It could be used from the inside of the tank when unfolded.
Now I’ll have a reason to play my IS-7.
Yep, beautiful isnt it? Cant wait til IS-7 model is completed!
there shuld be T69
I wonder if the Object 268 will be correctly remodeled or horribly buffed in comparison with the reality (as currently) …
It might be. They mostly change armor values when reworked in HD. But if the changes make it unbalanced, they’re gonna keep it like old…
buffed? what?
Correct me if I’m wrong, but the real life model has worse angles than the in-game model am I right? IRL the obj.268 is taller, the pike-nose due to the angles is worse…
I think the HD remodel of the obj.268 would mean further nerfs, thus WG should buff some of its stats, even just soft stats, or i dunno…
Looks ugly and useless.
Fingers crossed for IS-7! so far i think almost every HD model got it’s armor nerfed.
Since it is already brutally nerfed compared to its historical state I don’t think it can get much worse than it already is.
Ah you’re right. i’ve forgot about that.
because we need more german and soviet tanks in HD first, amrite?
Well they are the most played nations
tbh, i think it is because they shove those 2 nations down our throat
I agree
Take a look at STB-1, now at IS-7 or SU/ISU-152…Tell me, which one is newer…WG admits that newer models have higher details (higher polygon or smthing, im not an expert of this), but even casuals can see the difference.
Add to this the fact that germans, soviets and the US are the most played nations. (Though there is no french HD model so far, but 3 UK, and French tanks are a BIT more popular than UK vehicles…)
I am not surprised that tanks of the nations you mentioned are being prioritized after all… :/
To be honest, if WG are aiming to make the game look better, doesn’t that mean making HD skins for the older tanks, with the least polygons (first tanks to be implemented in the game) first would be why they are choosing this order? Especially ones that are most played.
No hd premiums? :D
Can’t wait to see church 3 and matilda 4 in HD
Yeah why aren’t all churchills remade right now? I mean the Churchill I and III share the same front hull and turret, III has the skirts that can be used on the church VII etc… you can make 3 tanks for the cost of like 3 models.
Looks like a Type 59 in the middle row of the second image.
type 59 as they said its keeping is armor values xD its not getting nerfed ever.
you would think they would do something like the T29 first. 3 tanks for the price of one. (T29, T30, T34)
2nd pic. Top, right row. Im 99% sure thats a t110e5
It indeed looks like E5, I am only concerned about the mudguard on the front, because that is not how E5 mudguard looks like. What do you think, they might have modified it?
Well, the E5 in real life had a totally different hull. It looked more like an enlarged T69 hull, with a straight sloped front, not egg-shaped like the M103. What’s in game right now is some weird blend of the M48 and T54 hulls. I’m betting they corrected it now though. And now that I think about it, the sliver of the turret does look more like an E5 than anything else.
What do you mean “in real life?” They never made any of the T110s. The closest thing to the T110 was the T95 with 120. http://blog.tankpedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Capture3.png
Because “never made” is a very ambiguous phrase. “In real life” obviously means what was made in real life and is what I was referring to. “Never made” =/= not designed.
http://i189.photobucket.com/albums/z41/YourLordandConqueror_2007/m60.jpg
http://i189.photobucket.com/albums/z41/YourLordandConqueror_2007/T110-5.png
http://i.imgur.com/lqiyyYi.jpg
The E5 “in real life” had a flat-sloped frontal plate like the T69 and a raised engine deck like the E3 and E4 have in Tanks. Completely unlike the M48/T54 hull it has in Tanks. But I guess Hunnicutt was just lying.
its an IS-7 see the pike nose?
Double M103? One looks like it has no track the other it does..weird
Brace yourselves; a nerf of T-62A is coming.
Yea it’s turret will probably become layered.
type 59 wont be i sence a type 59 whine about how op that armor value will be the same godly armor it always has ;p
The ISU-152 looks completely wrong. Has to be the worst model of a tank I have ever seen.
First Image:
Tiger II or E50/75
IS-7 (of course)
KV-85
T-62A
T-44
Second Image:
Back Row
KV-85
T-62A
T-44-122
T110E5 more than likely
:::Middle Row:::
Type 59
IS-4
M12
M103
:::Front Row:::
ST-1
M4A3E8 or T37
Tortoise
First image is probably a panther II, could be a Pz V/IV.
Could be the Panther II.
Panther II, Tiger II, E50,and E75 all have little loops extending from the rear of the hull sides for towing, this picture doesn’t have that. Only Panther I-based tanks lack those loops, and the only Panther-based tank that currently has spare track links on the rear like that is the Jagdpanther.
Other possibility is that this is the new upcoming premium Panther F.
Seeing as how there is only 1 example of a Panther II hull and 0 examples of the E50 and E75 I think you could guess that it could be them. However, there are plenty of tanks in the line ups that are already HD in the game so it could be the Panther. There’s just too little of the tank shown to know what it is. I could see it being the Jagdpanther as well based on the spare track links.
That’s an IS, not a KV-85
Either way the KV-85 is supposed to be HD in 9.3.
That’d be a WZ131/132/Type 62, not Type 59. Way too narrow hull.
type wont get a hd model because they dont want a whine of type 59 drivers.
Where did you hear this
T-62A got a larger commander cupola?
soviet tanks….. people love soviet tanks….
This video http://youtu.be/y1sRZTucWWI?t=9m35s
Going frame by frame you can get a better view on some of the distant ones.
https://i.imgur.com/tgOkeCV.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/P3ag1Wo.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/ZqVrWU3.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/4wg2i4l.jpg
and you can read some model names in some shots.
https://i.imgur.com/mvTSAyh.jpg
Just noticed that the GAZ tank destroyer is in the list in the bottom right corner. Interesting…