Just so you know, apparently the STB-1 depression will be -10, not (historical) -6
- Storm states that there will not be one “super patch” with HD client. There will be series of patches with improvements and additions, which will eventually lead to the “HD client”. The “HD client” will also feature full multicore support.
- when hitting a breakable object, the penetration of AP and APCR shells will decrease by a fixed number, not by a percentage of its full penetration
- captured German KV-1 (Pz.Kfpw.KV-1 756(r)) will be armed with the 75mm L/43 KwK 40 with the muzzle brake from the L/48 model
- angle of impact on a breakable object doesn’t influence the amount of penetration lost
- while the turret flying off will be implemented, this feature will not influence TD’s and arty.
- Object 430 will apparently have the analogical elevation to T-64 (SS: -6/+14), SerB is satisfied with the result
- the turret ripped off by an explosion will be a material object
- cruise control in WoT (R and F keys) is made so that the speed is kept constant and engine horsepower is adjusted dynamically to keep it constant
- not even WG staff (support) can change the results of a game already played (SS: by adding for example more credits)
- it takes the matchmaker singular seconds to put a battle order together, these times however differ between peak times and mornings for example
- the amount of gold shells in tier 8-10 battles has not decreased/increased since the last time it was reported (some times after gold ammo for credits was introduced)
- using prem shells has no effect on what your MM will be (SS: yes, players are still asking that)
- Q: “European 7/42 are noobs and Russians will destroy them if roaming is enabled, what will you do about it?” A: “Well, we’ll see how it goes”
- WG will not sell their technical drawings and documents of historical tanks
- for now, no plans for 7/42 battles economy are planned
- it’s theoretically possible there was another turret for T-62A, a player linked this schematic from a Russian tank magazine
- Japanese Chi-Ha is medium but Chinese Chi-Ha is a light tank in game, because it corresponds to their historical classifications by the respective armies: the Chinese considered it to be a light tank, the Japanese a medium tank
And, answers by Storm:
- it’s possible the Japanese map in 8.10 will NOT appear in 8.10 on RU/US/EU servers after all (will be “dumped” on Chinese server and for the Japanese), everything depends on player feedback (SS: read “Russian player feedback”)
- after this Asian map, the new maps will be all city maps: Kharkov, Minsk, Konigsberg, they will apparently feature historical places
- Storm states that Zlobny “did everything normally”, “everyone else who remains” will deal with balancing now, later he states that he won’t comment on the entire situation, but he doesn’t have and never had anything against Zlobny
- players are not happy about the fact one third of the new map will not be passable, Storm states this was done in order to put a big mountain there, that looks reall nice
- it’s possible that KV-1S will simply become an alternative hull for the KV-1, KV-85/100/122 will stay on tier 6 with reduced mobility
- T-62 will not be implemented, as it has a smoothbore gun
- it’s possible arty low and mid tiers will be further buffed, hightier arties are fine according to Storm
- WG is also thinking about balancing TD’s by removing the TD class camo bonus altogether
- the option to see the map before the 7/42 battle in advance will not come in 8.10
- no plans for IS-7 buff
- apparently, deformable objects and deformable ground will not be implemented for now (SS: as in, armor bending, craters after shells), it’s very very difficult to implement
- 7-8 new maps will be added to 7/42 (SS: in 8.10)
- 7/42 MM will be fixed somehow (regarding better skill MM implementation)
- while the turret, that got ripped off by ammorack explosion will be material, its gun will remain non-material
- it’s not known when Japanese heavy tanks will come, it’s possible they will not come next year at all
- after the Japanese tanks are out, Wargaming will take a long break in releasing new regular branches, apart from 2-3 premium/event tanks per patch. After this break, the British medium branch with Firefly might come, but this is not yet 100 percent sure
- for now, the “Alien” M6A2E1 will not get limited MM, as – strangely enough – it is doing fine in full MM only, it’s statistically around the middle of thanks of the same tier
- for now, there are no plans for a tier 8 Japanese medium tank
- while the lag during the “tank destroyed” message was fixed, the “stutter” (small freeze) when a tank is lit up for the first time is not (this is connected to the loading of the new model to memory, this is not possible to fix by pre-caching, as weak computers don’t have enough memory for that)
- trees and grass will be optimized in the client
- shadows will apparently not be optimized anymore: Storm stated that they did what they could, but shadows are problematic and requiring in any game
- there is no plan to allow reconnecting to server into a battle after a disconnect
- old render (standard graphics) will no longer be developed
- it’s possible the T71 will recieve an optional hull (SS: basially, there were two T71 proposals IIRC: the ingame T71 is a turret from proposal 1 and hull from proposal 2, an unhistorical mashup)
- Object 430 will have the same damage as T-62A (SS: yep, because it will have the same gun)
- developers thought about what to do with 6th Sense perk: Veider is for removing it altogether
- apparently, visual camo net (SS: a tank with visible camo net covering it) will NOT be implemented
- Havok will feature visually nice destruction of objects, but all objects will have to be remade under it
- Xbox version alread has Havok
- water will also recieve reflection optimizations
STB-1 makes WT-E100 look balanced, hopefully it will end up with about 1400 hit points and 360 view range to balance out the rest.
No one at WG thinks the STB-1 might be too stronk with the -10 gun depression? D:
If it’s too stronk, they’ll nerf it. Test Server will show what people will think about that. If it’s too powerful, the nerf is guaranteed.
I think it is ok, maybe the gun depression is a bit too much, -8 would be fine
-7 and we’re ok. Turret is already nicely armored.
>Turret is already nicely armored.
not really, its basically the same as the M103, and we all know how STRONK this turret is.
The cheeks of the turret are only 132mm, also mantle is only 115+35mm.
Wrong. The armor angling/sloping of the STB turret is much better. In world of tanks, armor sloping is king. The effective armor will be very high with such a shallow slope.
Well, someone remember that tier 10 chinese heavy that was too stronk of a tenk? It got replaced with the 113 we have now.
Doubt they will do that replacement thing again with the Japanese. My bet is the STB-1 is going to be another T57 Heavy or Foch 155.
STB-1 dont have autoloader. It has loading-assist mechanism.
I mean in terms of “too stronk, wanne get it, everybody plays it.”
Well, no. FV4202 is pretty good, in most ways better than Patton, and the line is not very pppular. And in the other hand we have the Leopard with a weird brach, very hard on tier 7, just like with the japanese tier 7
>FV4202
>pretty good
Give me some of the stuff you’re smoking
I have no idea why people like you find the FV bad… it’s just beyond me.
On tier 10 mediums i find that FV, 121 and Leo are the best mediums. It also shows in my win ratios. I find the 50M or the M48 or even T62 much less capable of influencing the battles than the FV is.
Take in count that DPM is on tier 7 with the T-44-122, and with low pen (175). Otherwise it has pretty tier 10 mds stats, good view range like FV4202, Leopard and M48A1. The pen is just like Bat Chat and WZ-121. The gun depresion mates the FV4202 and barely by one degree with the Patton. It’s just fine
And accuracy is worse than Leo’s 0.36 compared to 0.30. Rof also little lower and same paper hull
The Leo’s ROF os 6,67; the STB-1′s is 7,5. Turret armor is much weaker on the Leo.
They are no meant to do the same, Leo is a snipe grat sniper, STB-1 is a hull down brawler, probably it won’t have good came, despite the smaller it is
Bad camo? I don’t thinks so.
Balance purpose
Sorry for being off-topic but…
Leo 1 a sniper?…dafuq I just read….
If you camp and “snipe” with it you’llkill 75% of it’s advantages, those being greatspeed, greatmobility, greatview range, greatgun depression and holy camo + decent accuracy on the move.
(Leo1 solo 57%wr+2850 dpg driver)
When i say sniper y mean it’s main advantage compared to the other, Leo is better sniping, STB-1 is, due to the armour and RoF, a better brawler
Dat mobile divice write skills XD
Hey hey now, you’d be surprised hownhard it is to type on my tablet. And the system doesn’t even allow editing of posts.
Leo has one of the worst fire on the move acc on t10 meds…
Actualy, they removed WZ-111 variant 5 because it was just a copy paste and they received blueprints of 113 from china, that’s why chinese were postponed for another patch.
WZ-111 5 had just up-armored front plate from 120 to 150 and had 113′s gun along with 130mm one.
I’m happy they replaced it with 113, its a much better tank.
The WZ-121 is the same with better traverse and rate of fire but with wors hp/t
WZ-111 5A was removed because it made the IS-7 redundant.
It had similar armor, better speed, better stats for both of its guns, and way more hitpoints.
113 is an “okay” tank, it’s pretty much an Object 430U with the bias of soviet tank stripped away from it. I wish the 5A was still the tier 10 as it would be both a good pubbing tank plus clan wars reliable.
113 is neither of those.
Same armour layout on turret and hull, the 121 havin 10 les mm on the side and having -1 less dregree of gun depresion. Othersise is almost the same, exep for what I sais earlier
113 has its 120mm hull angled at 68 degrees, its effective armor is around 270mm.
121 has its 120mm hull angled at 60 degrees, its effective armor is around 210mm.
The IS-7 was made redundant ages ago when they introduced the T110E5.
Doubtful. It’s hard to understand how wargaming makes its decisions on what to nerf after a test server run. A lot of the time they nerf things that don’t need it, just in case they might turn out to be stronger on the live server, but then other times they leave things that seem obviously overpowered.
I played on the last test server and the new tier 8 and 9 german TDs seemed fine, but then they nerfed the absolute shit out of them in the second test patch. Everyone thought they were going to nerf the WTE100 but they left it alone. I personally didn’t think the WTE100 needed nerfing, but that seemed to be the whine from a lot of players. I do think the Pz4 WT (tier 9) was over nerfed (tier 8 is still ok), but wargaming won’t admit that until several months worth of gaming statistics are in.
If the STB1 is left like this and turns out to be overpowered on the live server it won’t be changed until months later.
well the sturer emil has -15 depression it doesn’t seem OP to me.. also the STB’s gun isn’t as accurate as the leo’s
Gun depresion is nothing when is one of your only two good things, the Esturer Emil only has good gun and good gun depression (the 400 view range is found on tier 3 with the french marder and in tier 5 with the bath tank
The sturer emil doesn’t have fantastic superstructure armor that will let it bounce shots when it’s hull down, that’s why it doesn’t seem overpowered to you. You’re ignoring one part of the problem …the fantastic armor of the STB1 turret. In world of tanks, generally only heavy tanks can use the hull down tactic well. Medium tanks either don’t have the turret armor or they don’t have good gun depression. The STB has both AND an incredible DPM, very good aim time, good accuracy and heavy tank penetration. Not to mention much better mobility than a heavy.
It is nearly impossible that the Supertest stats stay this way:
(or should i say impossibru?)
- better DPM, speed, view range and frontal hull armor than T-62a and Obj. 140 while having insignificantly less acc. and aim time
- better gun depression, speed and turnrate (both hull and turret) than the M48 Patton, while having the same frontal hull armor and potentially bouncier turret, but hey, Patton got 10m moar view range.
- better gun depression, same view range and frontal armor than leopard while having a small lack of mobility
My thoughts? This tank, as its stats are now, is retardedly OP. Semi-bouncy turret, american gun depression, insanely high DPM, same hp/ton ratio and view range as the leopard with no trade-off in frontal hull armor compared to other tier X meds. As far as it looks to me, STB-1 will be the new T-54 back from the old, dark times. Yes it has 10 mm less penetration (wow), but 254 mm pen is enough for most tier X tanks and there is still good old gold to shoot with (which has the same pen than every other meds).
When this tank is released, I think I’ll pack a bit more HE than usual, just so i can crit the shit out of these 35 mm sides.
got a typo: not same, but MORE frontal hull armor than leopard.
That’s what I mean.
STB-1 new meta! D:
btw -10 deg depression in that tiny, flat turret? This has to be one dayum short gun breech.
It’s not historically!
Like almost every tank in this game called “World of blueprints”
Or “World of Dumb”
It will be -10 because in real life it had -12, -6 in the turret and then it could lower the suspension to get another -6. Because the suspension can’t tilt in the game, they will add a bit more to it.
If you don’t know what you are saying better don’t say anithing
But he is right.
read your words and apply!
- it’s not known when Japanese heavy tanks will come, it’s possible they will not come next year at all
Stop dumping everything on me.
Explain.
Daigensu, nerf S(T)otally(B)alanced-1 gun depression, plox.
DGS has no influence on final in-game tanks in practice. She is a source for historical information, but WG will do whatever they want (of course), e.g. non-historical STB-1 gun depression.
If they stuck with historical in-turret gun depression this tank would be balanced, but they couldn’t help themselves. This makes all other Western T10 MT look like a joke, and threatens communist T10 MT hegemony.
B-C 25t excepted. :-P
I know.
:(
I am sure you can raise an angry mob of followers with pitch forks and torches if you need one Daigensui. Just say the word and we can all hop on planes and trains…
Yay for the firefly.
- after the Japanese tanks are out, Wargaming will take a long break in releasing new regular branches, apart from 2-3 premium/event tanks per patch. After this break, the British medium branch with Firefly might come, but this is not yet 100 percent sure
Would have though the lend lease line could have made it’s own short line independent of original British designs. There are certainly enough!
Not up to tier 10, and they are no only lend lease, someones are australins and canadians (part of the commonwealth)
- while the turret flying off will be implemented, this feature will not influence TD’s and arty.
I wish it would explode like a tin can.
I hope the us td line gets it so I can laugh while blowing up these bastards :D
Maus turret 0.o dafuq
I wonder if with the Hellcat we will just see a explosion in the oppen top turret
Interesting….hm….gas should go thru the open top.
Need to do calculations.
But what about Wafflentragger turrets? They cant fly :D Maybe T10 one but WTZ4 and Borsig…
WT E-100 would have just like a turbo in the back XD
*ammo racked*
TUUUUUUUUUURBOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
So if you face WTF100 and accidentally rack him – he might ram you to death at speed of sound :D
LOL 100 tons of street race cars XD
I was hoping that Object 430 would have a bigger gun. It seems that they just want the T-62A to be the third option when you have already used the 430 and the 140 on Clan Wars
T-62A is better at showing its turret; 140 and 430 have very weak turret tops to allow for 6 degrees gun depression.
- the turret ripped off by an explosion will be a material object
Inb4 turrets killing other tanks in RNG vids.
The turret of a KV-5 is 21 tons, so it can kill a LT – and/or create a mini roadblock/cover
- WG is also thinking about balancing TD’s by removing the TD class camo bonus altogether.
At least WTF100 wont feel anything.
Bout time this happened.
I’m sick and tired of those damn ISU-cloaking-device nonsense…
It is not historical anyway. It was the Allies who had the Camouflage cloaking device, which they utilized on their Mirage Tenk.
Instead russian TDs will now have Iron Curtain technology. Invincible armour for 30 seconds FTW.
hey dont forget flakbus :D
- while the turret flying off will be implemented, this feature will not influence TD’s and arty.
What about M8A1, T49, M10, M18, M36, T28 Prototype, T30 and T110E4? Or the turreted German TDs?
The turret blows up because of the presure inside it, with the open top ones nothing would happen :P
Closed turrets would act like they are now.
- developers thought about what to do with 6th Sense perk: Veider is for removing it altogether.
Give 4s delay time and leave it?
That would only made the battles a tiny bit longer. Won’t fix how it breaks the game.
5s!
most guns have ~2s reload.
If they give it 4s delay, its completely useless.
You dont need it anymore, you will be notified by shot 2s before the bulb lights on.
edit:
~2s aim.
Take into account that MOST guns have 6-10 reload.
Plus takes time to aim target.
Take into account that most guns can one-shot the scout using this skill.
only give it to scouts :3
Leave 6th sense as it is I say. Just add a cool-down time to it before it can ‘light up’ again, or just leave it as it is… to hell with the noobs who can’t use it or don’t know how.
- developers thought about what to do with 6th Sense perk: Veider is for removing it altogether
Woohoo~
My passive scouting will be so much better, now that the heavy’s won’t run for the nearest piece of cover then their light bulb blinks op.
*on
And, in return, you would be blown up by a tier 10 TD without having any idea what you did wrong.
Equality!
sounds like its going to make more people complain about tds
I use it on all of my tanks, and if it’s gone, ill feel something similar to withdrawal symptoms lol… I’m outright addicted to Sixth Sense.
Yeah, I have it on half my tanks as well, and I would rather the leave 6th sense alone. My Glass TDs specially need it.
~the British medium branch with Firefly might come~
I call this a dead horse, still nothing :(
But what about 2nd line of turret TDs?
Normal french heavies?
French mediums?
I think they mean they will come first?
I would love the Tortoise to be in tier 10 with better top speed and hp/t, dat DPM with speed and some armour agains low tier would be deadly. And of course a turreted td line with the 183 on tier 10
I only care about the Firefly, I don’t need anymore fake tanks before this awesome machine.
Stage 1 fv4005 for tier X.
LOL, fuck the death star, dat box tank would be awesome, same gun that the tortoise, probably the same RoF but with a turret, and like almost every tank in the wolrd, more mobile than the tortoise
That’s the fv4004, the 4005 is the autoloading 183 gun…
Oh the humanity! There’s also a second french TD line! The French superheavies! I just don’t get it why we’re getting second british medium line when Frechies were added 10 patches before brits and yet no new tech is coming for them ? This is outrageous, I will rant now until they add at least one line!
_______________________
Is this line good enough?
“apparently the STB-1 depression will be -10, not (historical) -6″
Fuck yeah. SHUT UP AND TAKE MY FREE XP.
take my gold when i convert it to free exp but not to t10 lol that would be mega expensive
“The “HD client” will also feature full multicore support.” Finally my 4 core 3ghz possessor will shine
You will possess it all.
- while the turret, that got ripped off by ammorack explosion will be material, its gun will remain non-material
Even though guns are non-material right now, the gun of a dead tank can still block your shots if you are unlucky enough to hit it while aiming at a guy hiding behind it. Will this also be the case for guns on blown up turrets?
most likely, yes
but, you have to be on way lower terrain to be bothered by that
Ehm ELC ehm
“- players are not happy about the fact one third of the new map will not be passable, Storm states this was done in order to put a big mountain there, that looks reall nice”
More like most of the new maps were made like that, getting real tired of your fucking rocks, mountains, lakes and buildings. Port is your most grotesque example, WG.
sounds like you just want a flat open field as the only map? or how about we dump 30 tanks in a little boxing ring, might be even more fun :P
If they are all T7 CC. Then I am so on for that.
That would kill the server
- developers thought about what to do with 6th Sense perk: Veider is for removing it altogether
NONONONONO! If they do that, they have to give every commander who had sixth sense enought xp for 3 skills + 1k gold…. Its the most important skill of all.
Its an OP skill… It saved my butt so many times that i dont have enough fingers to count them all. I have no clue what i’ll do with myself without sixth sense…. On my Amx 50B, i need it so badly though, if i’m lit and i dont know it, ill be hit by arty so hard ill piss my pants.
The only tanks that should get 6th sense are scouts.
And what if your tank functions as a light tank (Batchat, Cromwell, Leopard 1) but has no access to the perk?
people have forgot how to play this game because of that skill
tactical thinking and reaction to what goes on are now way less important than they should be
Yeah Easy Mode (6th Sense) – FTW…. I just want to keep it… and its no more OP or game breaking than Premium Ammo… and we all use that… and have access to it without the need to grind crew….
I still think even after update 100.0 they will not bring to life the Landkreuzer P. 1000 Ratte…
My mistake, if they rejected the project already.
-10 depression on a tank with the expected mantlet armor? The power creep in this game is becoming unbelievable.
i wasn’t going to get the STB-1 was it wasn’t anything special It has a worse gun than the leo expect for ROF but if it really has -10 and that gets implemented then this may actually be a reason to get this tank after all
Did i just see a f f f firefly? :o
My dream has come true!.
I do not understand why people keep praising Firefly. Of course it was great and I too would wish to have it in full glory, but do not forget how people got their hopes high with Emil and how it ended. Firefly with 17Pdr on tier 6 medium (IIRC) ? It will have dpm like 1500 or awfully bad mobility or non existent depression or something like that. In worst case scenario, we will get another Panther with giant poking device on one tier lower, i.e. nice gun and everything, but vehicle as whole only suitable for camping afar (which frankly can be done with almost any tank in game)
Well yea i see what you mean.. but i just like the look of it too + look at the slope not the best but yea (ofc i have more but i wont tell now hehe)
Irl it was a good match for the tiger.
This is because they could both penetrate each other at standard combat ranges.
In game, I think the difference in tiers will be balanced by the difference in hp mainly.
I’d hope to see it with the same dpm as m1a2 on e2/8 but lower rof.
Pingback: 28.11.2013 | WoTRomania
Isn’t -10 depression a compromise because they couldn’t implement the hydro-pnemeumatic suspension?
yes .
- WG is also thinking about balancing TD’s by removing the TD class camo bonus altogether
______________
Why not just remove TD all together. Maybe then fucking whiners will stop whining and then finally be somewhat useful in their hurr durr i iz in heavi tenk, i iz invincible tanks. It’s not like TDs are still spotted easily just like any other tanks.
- developers thought about what to do with 6th Sense perk: Veider is for removing it altogether
_____________
Yea do that and see the shitstorm rising. If no one complains about it then why fucking changing/removing it?
If I recall Serb’s statment about that cuz: “It isnt realistic” ROFL xD
It’s like calling tank’s HP system unrealistic xD
Well, premium ammo is the most complained about ‘feature’ yet they want to kill 6th sense and remove TD camo. Only Tier 9-10 TDs are OP (some, not all) and should be dealt with by slight rebalance to their HP pool (which is too high – same as heavies almost) and slightly reduced Alpha (850>750 and 1050>900) while keeping their ROF.
- Q: “European 7/42 are noobs and Russians will destroy them if roaming is enabled, what will you do about it?” A: “Well, we’ll see how it goes”
Good players will make a stand even if they are rly worse, that’s the best learning opportunity ever and noobs shouldn’t play 7/42 at all.
hell i wont even touch it unless i get invited. i’m more of a massive battle guy than a tiny 5 tier 8s vs 5 tier 8s
It is actually very very profitable once you get a good team going and win every single game.
“for now, there are no plans for a tier 8 Japanese medium tank”
shouldn’t be premium japanese medium tank?
isn’t sta-1 medium on VIII tier ?
“after this Asian map, the new maps will be all city maps: Kharkov, Minsk, Konigsberg, they will apparently feature historical places”
FUCK YEAH FINALLY MORE CITY MAPS
i have never.used 6th sense after 8k battles… when i finally decide to put it on tanks, it is planned to be removed.. gj wg
city maps are welcome though, best maps are urban ones
WG, don’t you fucking dare release a 2nd British medium line before the 2nd French medium line.
DON’T
YOU
FUCKING
DARE.
- WG is also thinking about balancing TD’s by removing the TD class camo bonus altogether
Uhhh, byebye my ninja 268….. QQ
- developers thought about what to do with 6th Sense perk: Veider is for removing it altogether
And the most important skill of all my tank will be gone(?). And again many ppl will complain about TDs coz they’re blind now, and die from big caliber shell rain
- Havok will feature visually nice destruction of objects, but all objects will have to be remade under it
This is all skinner biggest nightmare
They are NOT blind. They are idiots if they do not counter the TD threat by changing their tactics. 6th sense is the dumbest perk they could have ever added into the game. I don’t rely on it to win games and I do well enough. People CAN change their play style to do with out the 6th sense and if they cant then that’s their own problem.
It may sound a bit harsh and it should be. Something will change soon enough and knock TD;s off their high horse eventually. So if 6th sense suddenly went away I would not worry at all. I suppose practicing in Historical Mode once in awhile makes you realize just how sneaky you can be in a tank. =)
Historical mode? That sounds interesting. :)
the amount of gold shells in tier 8-10 battles has not decreased/increased since the last time it was reported (some times after gold ammo for credits was introduced)
Well, i cannot believe this… To my experience this is not true
It’s fucking lie, that’s what it is. Every retarded decision they make is working as intended.
- it’s possible arty low and mid tiers will be further buffed, hightier arties are fine according to Storm
8.6 general arty nerf
8.9 slight arty buff
8.10 slight arty buff again
LOGIC?
the amount of gold shells in tier 8-10 battles has not decreased/increased since the last time it was reported (some times after gold ammo for credits was introduced)
how can they sell us this bullshit, is beyond me…
since I installed that mode that tells you what kind of ammo type is shot at you, I am just disgusted with the amount of gold flying right and left specially from “good” and “great” players who are supposed to know how and where to aim and are supposed to be “good” and “great”…
I already knew that bad players are spamming gold shells just to be able to barely stay in the game.. but a lot of green, blue and purple players are shooting only gold shells specially in tanks that don’t need it at all, like tier 10 mediums or even tier 10 TDs which I find just retarded and sad :(
“- captured German KV-1 (Pz.Kfpw.KV-1 756(r)) will be armed with the 75mm L/43 KwK 40 with the muzzle brake from the L/48 model”
Nice! I wonder where they’ll put it? Premium?
BTW I think it’s Pz.Kpfw, isn’t it?
I wonder if we’ll get GuP’s voice in the 8.10.
“it’s possible the T71 will recieve an optional hull” I like the sound of that!
also:
“apparently, visual camo net (SS: a tank with visible camo net covering it) will NOT be implemented”
That news sucks, was always hoping to get that. Then again WG has been known to say things like this and then change their minds. With cosmetic additions supposedly coming I can easily see the eventuality of a visual camo net.
When turret explosions will get implemented it’ll be interesting to stay by an ammoracking Maus.