Source: http://worldoftanks.com/en/news/pc-browser/17/forum-survey/

Hello everyone,

an interesting survey popped up on the US server. WG NA is asking the US server players, what do they think about Wargaming and World of Tanks. Several players will be (I assume) randomly drawn and will win a KV-5, KV-220 or E-25, so go and tell them straight what you think :)

http://worldoftanks.com/en/news/pc-browser/17/forum-survey/

The poll is US server only (no winnings for you, EU!), but anyone can answer really. A former clanmate of mine, who mostly handles database architecture for a Casino Österreich online network these days, still actively logs onto the NA portal just to fill out these WG surveys and complain about the ongoing artillery rebalance. So if you feel like sharing your opinion wherever you are, go right ahead. The questions are (my answer in brackets):

- rate current World of Tanks from 1 to 10 (4-5)
- how likely is it that you would recommend the World of Tanks forums to a friend or colleague? from 1 to 10 (0, no reason to, whatever questions a friend would have, I could answer, so why send him there?)
- how often do you visit the World of Tanks forums currently? (daily, but that comes with making FTR)
- what is the first place you visit on the forums? (general section)
- do you check the Wargaming staff posts? (WG EU? almost never, they rarely know something I don’t, WG NA – Chieftain only, WG RU – quite a lot)
- how comfortable are you posting on the forums? From 1 to 10 (3, used to be 6-7 – IMO the EU forum section degraded a lot into a lot of bickering, NA is odd lately, RU is fine)
- what concerns, if any, do you have about posting? (???)
- what can we do to improve your experience on the forums? (start banning some specific people that make the community toxic)
- is there anything else you would like to tell us? (nothing that’s not 21+)

Part 1: http://ftr.wot-news.com/2015/01/30/occulus-rift-mod-for-world-of-tanks-part-1-with-download/

Check this out – you can download the mod here:

English instructions
The mod itself

General UI issues

In our game – just like many others – practically the UI (both in combat and in the garage) is stretched towards the edges of the screen. If you use it without any modifications, you get the following issue: due to the design specifics of Occulus Rift, the only area that is in your field of view is the central area of the image – and UI, as it is, does not fit into that area (or does only partially):

Continue reading →

So, following a short absence I realised that I need to put a few more Patent vehicle out there. The usual batch of the silly, dangerous, badly thought-out and impractical along with some decent ideas mixed together. So yes; some absurd, some not so much. You choose.

Deciding that after the war, France really needed an 80cm high armoured coffin in January 1955, Victor Bouffort, along with hundreds before and since, thought of the individual armoured machine involving lying prone, protected by flimsy armour. At least for once, the hapless driver gets company in a two man machine, as well as a very funky helmet. So; could be worse I suppose.

Continue reading →

Hello everyone,

9.6 test round 3 started. A list of changes:

- fixed the visual and collision models of HD E-100 and T95
- fixed a large number of issues with combat equipment (SS: stronghold consumables)
- improved the game performance when triggering combat equipment
- fixed the bug where the game froze when you tried to change camouflage or inscriptions on a tank, that didn’t have full crew
- fixed the descriptions of some IM’s
- fixed some issues with IM UI
- fixed some ingame and UI issues of Stronghold mode
- fixed some issues during the crew role change
- fixed some interface issues of the client, when using social networks

Hello everyone,

the contributor review is back after I skipped one. These days are a very chaotic time for me, there’s a lot of stuff to do and little time for pretty much everything – so, sorry :) And yes, it’s connected with FTR as well.

This time, I’d like to thank the following people for donating:

Lee D. (Germany) – a message from him: “WUB WUB in space” :)
Lars R.T. (Denmark) – thank you for the generous contribution :) Much appretiated.
Michael R. (Germany) – glad you liked the article, mate :)
Andrew B. (California, US)
Mark P. (United Kingdom)
Mario N. (Slovakia)
KTZV_D86 of the LAS clan (Germany)
Michael H. (United Kingdom) – yes mate, I know about that petition, already linked it before
Shaun H. (United Kingdom)
Andrew N. (Australia)
Tomáš L. (?)
David S. (Washington, USA)

Some of you guys already contributed repeatedly, thank you – I really appreciated. Of course, I appreciate the Patreon donations as well – next week, there will be a “contributor special”, dedicated to the Patreon guys. You all have given me a lot of support – simply thank you.

Otherwise, apart from being really busy, not much is going on, everything’s as usual (well, maybe more typos than usual, but that’s been constant for last months I am afraid).

Hello everyone,

as you probably already know, one of the main features of patch 9.6 will be the retraining of crew members from a different role to another (for example from radioman to gunner). This change is as far as I know available ONLY for gold and on test 1, the price was 600 gold, but it was decided to reduce it to 500 gold.

As you can imagine, the price was not met with much approval from the community and many complained that it’s too high. Here’s Storm’s answer (from the non-public section of RU forum):

“The most common case during the tanker role retraining: unlocking a new tank, retraining the crew to it from the old one and it turns out that one more tanker is needed (or, opposite, you have one tanker too many). And so, you take a free tanker and you try to put it in this tank (or in the opposite case, you take the free tanker and you retrain it to another tank).

As such:
- you retrain the tanker to another tank
- there’s a skill/perk reset (since you have a different role now)
- the role itself gets changed

At first, we charged 200 gold for each of these operations (as we did earlier), in total we got 600 gold. Then we reduced it to 500. A bulk discount :)”

Hello everyone,

the Insider returns to tell us what the developers are considering for the people, who rig the individual missions.

The developers are well aware of the issue of rigged battles and are concerned with it. The people, who rig battles, will not only have their rewards removed, but already do recieve a seven day ban. No defense is admissible to the verdict, as they – to quote one of the developers:

“talk out of their ass justifying any form of match rigging by the terms of handicapping enemy or allies or purposedly changing in any way, mentioned or unmentioned by normal map battle dynamics”

Furthermore, developers consider “rewarding” the riggers with a lifetime ban from any individual missions (they will not be eligible for any rewards). According to developers, there is plenty of time to complete the missions legally and the riggers often are greedy kids, who just want “it all right now”.

But of course, that’s WG RU… WG EU – a different story completely. Did you know that you can’t write a ticket about game rigging on EU server?

Well, now you do.

Hello everyone,

I was sent this rather interesting video, showing something that’s probably not very commonly accessible, the Italeri model plant inside. Thinking of buying your World of Tanks-themed Italeri kit? Here’s how it’s made.

Thanks to Vollketten for this one :)

Hello everyone,

need a good laugh? Well, here’s some stronk French armor history. In the TnT magazine, January/February 2009, the French actually proved that the Panther is superior to IS-3! :)

Let’s start with something mild. The armor.

Well, for starters, that’s a Panther with 88mm L/71 and Schmalturm. Because, you know, that totally existed. The numbers are off too – but whatever. The magazine is calling that Panther Ausf.F. Newsflash: Panther Ausf.F did NOT have the 88mm L/71, that was a separate project! But no worries, it gets better – mobility:

Continue reading →