Airborne tanks in World of Tanks?

Hello everyone,

one reader recently wrote me an interesting e-mail, asking whether I think amphibious and airborne tanks would work in World of Tanks. Well, at first, I was like “obviously”, since we actually have two airborne models in the game already (the Locust and the Tetrarch). As regular tanks of course – and that’s how the amphibians would have to work too. But… could they work with some sort of airborne/amphibious advantage? Well, let’s have a look.

A bit of history

The concept of an airborne assault vehicle, although explored even before the war, emerged fully during the early- and mid-war years. The goal was of course to produce an armored vehicle, that would be transported by a plane, glider or other flying means (we’ll get to that) in order to reach the combat zone along with glider troops or paratroopers and to provide fire support to otherwise lightly armed paratroop infantry. It was viewed as one means of increasing the paratrooper firepower (others were light AT-guns, light manpack howitzers and oversized AT rifles) and pretty much every major WW2 nation had a research dedicated to creating this kind of armored vehicle.

320px-M22_Locust_1

Continue reading

Contributors, be recognized!

Hello everyone,

so, the other day I was checking out Rita’s stream page and one noticed one thing: she has a list of all the contributors (who donated or otherwise contributed to her and the stream) under her stream, nice and visible. And I was like “Why don’t I have such a thing?” See? Good influence.

Last year, a lot of you guys helped me out and I am really grateful for that. In order to recognize you, contributors, I decided to have something like this too this year. And so, I created a page of contributors, because your continuous support is very important to me. You will find it on the menu below the logo too – and I will be doing a public update every week or two.

Thank you all
Silentstalker

Storm on Supertest icon leaks

Source: http://world-of-ru.livejournal.com/2952050.html

Hello everyone,

about the leaks posted earlier, Storm reacted in Livejournal blog comments and I have some bad news for those, who liked them:

F1vdT32

“They pulled out some sort of old garbage, that was made and was forgotten or was never implemented in branches for various reasons”

I guess we won’t see these vehicles anytime soon. Pity. And what else Storm says?

germany-Agrimotor

- the icon above belongs to the Agrimotor, Storm states it was a test vehicle, it’s already 4 years old
- E-10 will not be implemented with variable clearance
- the variable clearance mechanism was not tested on E-25 either

Posted in Q&A

Silenstalker and Rita QA 2

Hello everyone,

just a quick heads up. Recently I was watching the QA stream with Rita stream that got saved on twitch and I noticed that a lot of interesting questions did not get answered (Rita has this neat app where the chat gets saved to the stream too). Therefore, I will appear on today’s Rita stream at 8 PM CET to answer more stuff. After that, we won’t be doing this for a while (if at all, depends on Rita, popularity and all the other factors), so if you feel like asking anything or just to listen me rant about tanks and WoT, drop by to say hi :)

There will be following changes to the stream however:

- it will definitely be shorter, 6 hours is meh
- we won’t be playing, we will only be talking, showing pictures if needed and such stuff (that way, more questions get answered and neither me nor Rita will be distracted)
- the sound will be better (no game sounds, higher volume for my mic than last time)
- I will also be reading the chat, but it will be Rita who picks the questions

I hope to see you there at 8 PM CET then :)

Straight outta Supertest: New tank icons

Source: wot-news

Hello everyone,

recently, someone leaked new icons from supertest again :) Some we have seen before, some are new though, so let’s have a look at it. The descriptions are obviously mine.

AMR-35

france-AMR_35

French light tank, total crap. Might find use in WoT though.

E-10

germany-G47_E10

Original Wargaming description (also leaked):

A proposed light tank destroyer weighing about 12 tons. Its most innovative feature was to be the ability to adjust the ground clearance, changing the vehicle’s height from 1760 to 1400 mm. The vehice would be powered by either the Maybach HL 100 or the Argus engine. Development was discontinued in favor of the Hetzer.

Neubaufahrzeug

germany-NbFz

One of the earliest German tanks. You can read about it a bit more here. Nice premium variant overall.

T88 HMC

usa-A59_T88

The T88 is simply a Hellcat with a 105mm howitzer. Please note that this is not a tank destroyer, but an artillery vehicle.

US Chi-Ri

usa-Chi_Ri

This is apparently an American captured tank version of the Japanese Chi-Ri. It’s nice to see that the development of captured tank continues.

Continue reading

14.1.2014

- some vehicles (like the FCM 50t) have visibly lower quality of some parts of the model (in this case, tracks). The reason for that is that currently, the maximum amount of polygons per model is limited and sometimes there’s just not enough
- improved Prokhorovka (SS: see earlier leak post) is work in progress, it will not appear in 8.11, maybe it will in 9.0
- Windstorm map (SS: modelled apparently after Trondheim) will appear in 8.11
- the Windstorm map is the same map Storm referred to as “Norwegian/Swedish map”
- the guns on the Prokhorovka map (if I understand it correctly) will be German
- the new Prokhorovka is not made for HD-client yet

Continue reading

Posted in Q&A

Straight outta Supertest: Map leaks

Source: http://world-of-ru.livejournal.com/2947595.html

Warning, this post is VERY picture heavy

So, a couple of pictures were leaked by supertesters. First, Prokhorovka will be graphically reworked. The map now looks more war-torn, with smoke on the horizon, destroyed guns and such. This map is work in progress and Storm confirmed it will NOT appear in 8.11

proch1

Continue reading

WG EU fail: Orlik medal post – stronk history

Source: Dom1n’s blog

Hello everyone,

today, Dom1n (Polish blogger) pointed out in the linked above article that Wargaming’s Orlik post is not exactly historically accurate. So, in order to fix the info:

- the vehicle on the picture is obviously not Orlik’s 20mm TKS tankette, but a TK3 with a 7,92mm Wz.25 machinegun. The 20mm version looks like this (very difficult to look up the correct picture, took me as long as like 5 seconds):

QB2vgqA

- Victor IV Albrecht von Ratimor (as posted in WG’s article) was actually von Ratibor, here’s the announcement of his death:

POL_Wiktor_IV_Albrecht_von_Ratibor

- the man on the picture posted by Wargaming is actually Roman Radwan-Okuszko, not Roman Orlik. I can see where this came from though, several western sources mess the picture up.

I actually thought that Wargaming made one more mistake – not long ago, Listy wrote a post about this encounter, where he states Ratibor was actually riding a Panzer IV and commanded two LT-35′s, but after looking up several Polish sources, I think Wargaming might actually be right, prince Ratibor likely died in a Panzer 35 (t), according to Polish sources. However, even Polish sources differ in here, so it’s really not clear.

Either way, these historical posts should be as much accurate as possible. Orlik’s heroic action deserves nothing less.