Empire’s Border – map restricted to Chinese server

Hello everyone,

CypherHK (US server) made a review of the special Chinese server only map called Empire’s Border and he was nice enough to send the video to me. Now you all can have a look – we won’t see this map on EU, US and RU server and I actually think it might be a pity (so much work on a map only to give it to one server) – but, is it good? Well, have a look!

 

Next tier 10 discount…

Thanks to lucitribal for letting me know about this one.

Hello everyone,

not sure about you guys, but I almost forgot about the event with the tier 10 discounts – but it looks like the next tier 10 discount will be the Jagdpanzer E-100 according to the calendar on US server.

However, looking at EU calendar, I can’t help but notice the lack of tier 10 discounts. No tier 10 discounts for you, European capitalists!

(Okay, to be fair, the word is, they might return in February)

WG EU: CW rules and support fail

Hello everyone,

we all probably encountered some bad apples from support section. Most aren’t rude, but some just don’t bother reading the tickets you send them. Take a look at this case for example. Recently, in CW rules, WG failed to specify that draw would be considered a loss for the defender of the province (American CW rules had it though, that’s why it was discovered quickly and is specifically a WG EU fail). Infinity_ from (1337) clan decided to investigate the issue, because the clan, unaware of the rule, lost a province apparently. And here’s what happened…

(TLDR: first support staffmember didn’t bother to read the ticket and answered something that wasn’t asked, second admitted the mistake and confirmed WG EU fail in writing the rules)

Continue reading

Silentstalker vs World of Warplanes, Day 1

Hello everyone,

well, I’ve finally done it. After postponing it for a very, very long time, I’ve finally installed World of Warplanes to try it out and to see how well it will fit with me – and to share my opinions and experiences with you.

A little background first, so you know about how (un)biased I am. Let me start with saying that I hate flying in real life. Yea, I know, good start. But – that doesn’t prevent me apparently from trying out flying simulators, or, rather – arcade games in this case. I am saying this in advance so you know I am not fond of doing loopings 10 meters above ground and such stuff, but on the other hand, if necessity dictates, I can try. I played other simulator games, but that was a long, long time ago. Specifically, it was Aces of the Pacific and Aces over Europe, probably like 15 years ago. I know the absolute basics (like what flaps do and that it’s probably not a good idea to fly around with your landing gear open), but other than that, I am a complete newbie. I also have not seriously played War Thunder and I will not compare those two games. For now anyway.

Continue reading

12.1.2014

Not much today. Or rather… nothing at all (and I dug for an hour).

Meanwhile on EU server chat…

shot_024

(taken today by me, cDa is a WG employee and moderator (and a nice guy overall BTW) – probably a mistake, but who knows with WG EU, maybe someone let something slip? :) )

Be also sure to check out Chieftain’s New Hatch on information sources. Pretty interesting stuff and anyone who is actively looking for info about tanks should read it.

Posted in Q&A

WG EU: Competition Coincidence

Hello everyone,

here’s a thought. I don’t follow competitions and contests on EU server much – the reason is obvious: even if I was (for example) the best graphic designer in the world, I won’t win anything, because Silentstalker. Therefore, I came to notice this a bit late, but still.

So, there is this competition called In The Headlines, where you were supposed to create front pages of a fictional magazine. You’ve probably noticed it earlier if you are on EU forums, because a mutation of this competition appeared in every language section.

Now, we know that Wargaming will be starting a magazine of its own on RU and EU server. We also know that since Issue 2, there will be a copy available in Czech language too (so it’s logical to assume all the other official languages will get their version – I expect some stronk translatink). And we also know that Wargaming likes to “borrow” other people’s stuff on more than one occasion.

Hmmm, might there be a connection? Maybe someone clueless (in best WG EU competence traditions) is looking for “inspiration”? Maybe it’s like the American Green Card program – for a price of awarding a few green cards via a lottery you get a nice long list of all the potential illegal immigrants, who happily submit their personal data for that small chance?

Meh. Maybe I am just paranoid. It’s a thought though. What do you think?

Getting rid of the overpowered T18

Hello everyone,

if you played on low tiers during this Christmas, you are probably familiar with this situation: you want to take your shiny new gift tank for a spin, enter the battle and… both teams have a sealclubbing platoon of T18 TD’s, played by experienced players with trained crews – and you can’t do anything about it, your bullets (literally, as the main gun of the Vickers Mk.VIc is a machinegun) bounce off it and it tears your team up – whichever team has better T18 players, wins. Your first thought: that thing’s overpowered, we should get rid of it!

But wait, we can’t just do that. There has to be a reason. Let’s break down the T18 situation into three questions:

- is it really overpowered?
- is it historical?
- what can be done about that?

Continue reading

WG EU fail: promoting fake tanks

Thanks to Chr15 for this one

Hello everyone,

this is something that actually made me giggle. You know how Wargaming has regionally-split Facebook pages, right? If you are German, you will see the German page, if you are American, you will see the American one and so on. Well, the German WG FB page is really funny, because it apparently employs historical specialists. However, WG “specialist” does not mean “expert”, it means “his mum said he’s special”.

Check this out – German FB “specialist” is asking, what tank is this?

13zawk3a9ko

Yea, that’s a photoshopped picture – a notorious fake, allegedly showing the E-25 hull, but in reality it’s “just” a Hetzer, shopped to look like the E-25. Unfortunately I can’t link it to you (you have to be German to see the German WG FB page, or at least reconfigure your FB somehow).

Obviously, people who actually deal wit a tank game should be able to recognize blatant fakes. No E-25 hull was ever built as far as we (and Mr.Doyle) know. According to Kniepkamp, several hulls were built by Alkett, but noone ever found them.

11.1.2014

Overlord is asking: what do you think of the Missions system in WoT? You can answer him under his post.

- the reason the U-8TS gun (that the tier 10 Soviet meds have) has various characteristics on various tanks is caused by different turrets, different ergonomics and different equipment, it’s completely realistic for one gun to give different performance on different tanks
- apparently implementing the amount of crew XP recieved in post-battle statisics doesn’t have high priority
- apprently both the T110E3 and T110E4 will be nerfed (SS: if I understand it correctly), currently T110E3 has a bit better winrate than T110E4
- it seems that SerB is not exactly agreeing with the implementation of the option to disable the battle chat

Continue reading

Posted in Q&A

Historical candidates for FV4202 replacement

Hello everyone,

as I informed you several times already (including personal confirmation by WG EU’s historical expert, Challenger), current tier 10 British medium tank in the game, FV4202, is very unhistorical (armor is overbuffed, wrong gun if I recall correctly – the real life FV4202 carried only the 20pdr) and if Wargaming brought it to historical parameters, it would be like tier 8 stuff.

Naturally, there have been some thoughts by players to have it replaced by something else. Will this really happen? Who knows. But I was of course wondering, what vehicles are available to replace it (if any) and so I asked around, specifically those, who know a lot about British tanks: Listy and Xlucine. Special thanks go to Cannoneer (WG RU) for linking me some of the sources for the Action X.

Basically, we (well, they), apart from some vague ideas about uparmored Centurion variants (Xlucine’s materials, up to him to publish what we found), we found out that there are only two realistic options, each with its advantages and disadvantages. I am pretty sure that any potential replacement would be one of these two – IF Wargaming decided to implement a new vehicle at all (it’s probably also possible to separate Centurion Mk.IX from tier 9, but that would mean a lot of tree re-work and rebalancing of both tier 9 and 10 instead of just tier 10).

Continue reading